Modeling Photo-multiplier Gain and Regenerating Pulse Height Data for Application Development

Systems that adopt organic scintillation detector arrays often require a calibration process prior to the intended measurement campaign to correct for significant performance variances between detectors within the array. These differences exist because of low tolerances associated with photo-multiplier tube technology and environmental influences. Differences in detector response can be corrected for by adjusting the supplied photo-multiplier tube voltage to control its gain and the effect that this has on the pulse height spectra from a gamma-only calibration source with a defined photo-peak. Automated methods that analyze these spectra and adjust the photo-multiplier tube bias accordingly are emerging for hardware that integrate acquisition electronics and high voltage control. However, development of such algorithms require access to the hardware, multiple detectors and calibration source for prolonged periods, all with associated constraints and risks. In this work, we report on a software function and related models developed to rescale and regenerate pulse height data acquired from a single scintillation detector. Such a function could be used to generate significant and varied pulse height data that can be used to integration-test algorithms that are capable of automatically response matching multiple detectors using pulse height spectra analysis. Furthermore, a function of this sort removes the dependence on multiple detectors, digital analyzers and calibration source. Results show a good match between the real and regenerated pulse height data. The function has also been used successfully to develop auto-calibration algorithms.

[1]  P. Gumplinger,et al.  Simulating response functions and pulse shape discrimination for organic scintillation detectors with Geant4 , 2014 .

[2]  S. A. Pozzi,et al.  Digital data acquisition and processing for a neutron-gamma-ray imaging system , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[3]  M. J. Joyce,et al.  Real-Time Capabilities of a Digital Analyzer for Mixed-Field Assay Using Scintillation Detectors , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[4]  Miriam Colling,et al.  Fast neutron tomography with real-time pulse-shape discrimination in organic scintillation detectors , 2016 .

[5]  David L. Chichester,et al.  Passive measurement of organic-scintillator neutron signatures for nuclear safeguards applications , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[6]  Sara A. Pozzi,et al.  Image reconstruction of shielded mixed-oxide fuel using a dual-particle imaging system , 2014, 2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[7]  Kelum A. A. Gamage,et al.  Real-Time, Fast Neutron Coincidence Assay of Plutonium With a 4-Channel Multiplexed Analyzer and Organic Scintillators , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[8]  Malcolm J. Joyce,et al.  A 4-channel multiplex analyzer for real-time, parallel processing of fast scintillators , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[9]  Sean C. Stave,et al.  Current Status of Helium-3 Alternative Technologies for Nuclear Safeguards , 2015 .

[10]  Malcolm J. Joyce,et al.  Automated response matching for organic scintillation detector arrays , 2017 .

[11]  Malcolm J. Joyce,et al.  Active fast neutron singles assay of 235U enrichment in small samples of triuranium octoxide , 2016 .

[12]  S. A. Pozzi,et al.  Characterization of a Mixed Multiplicity Counter Based on Liquid Organic Scintillators , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[13]  Michael Heil,et al.  Pulse shape analysis of liquid scintillators for neutron studies , 2002 .