Network structure is related to social conflict in a cooperatively breeding fish

The nature of individual social interactions can have a profound influence on group structure and function. Here, we use social network analysis to examine patterns of dominance interactions and spatial associations in 14 captive social groups of the cooperatively breeding cichlid, Neolamprologus pulcher. In this cichlid, social groups are composed of a dominant breeding pair and 1–20 nonbreeding subordinate helpers that form size-based queues for breeding positions. In the current study, we performed the first quantitative analysis of N. pulcher dominance hierarchies. We found that dominance hierarchies of N. pulcher were highly linear and that interactions within dyads were directionally consistent. We also found that dominance interactions were not equally distributed across the network, but instead occurred most frequently at the top of the social hierarchy. Contrary to our predictions, neither body size asymmetry nor sex predicted the observed dominance interactions and patterns of associations. However, breeders were more connected than helpers within the networks, perhaps due to their policing role. This study is one of a small handful to conduct network analysis on replicate social groups, and thus is one of few studies able to make general conclusions on the social structure of its focal species. The patterns uncovered suggest that conflict over breeding position inheritance has a strong impact on relationships among group members in N. pulcher.

[1]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Aggression, dominance, and mating success among capybara males (Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris) , 1993 .

[2]  I. Chase,et al.  Self-structuring properties of dominance hierarchies a new perspective. , 2011, Advances in genetics.

[3]  M. Newman,et al.  Identifying the role that animals play in their social networks , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  M. Taborsky,et al.  Large group size yields group stability in the cooperatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher , 2005 .

[5]  Inma Estevez,et al.  Analysis of the movement and use of space of animals in confinement: the effect of sampling effort , 2006 .

[6]  Anthony J. Gaston,et al.  The Evolution of Group Territorial Behavior and Cooperative Breeding , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[7]  Richard James,et al.  Social networks in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Patsy Haccou,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Behavioural Data: An Approach Based on Time-structured Models , 1992 .

[9]  Ramon C. Littell,et al.  Combining One-Sided Binomial Tests , 1986 .

[10]  M. Taborsky,et al.  Helpers in fish , 1981, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[11]  O. Leimar,et al.  Evolution of Fighting Behaviour: Decision Rules and Assessment of Relative Strength , 1983 .

[12]  S. Crowell‐Davis,et al.  Dominance relationships and aggression of foals (Equus caballus) , 1994 .

[13]  Martina Morris,et al.  statnet: Software Tools for the Representation, Visualization, Analysis and Simulation of Network Data. , 2008, Journal of statistical software.

[14]  H. Reeve A Transactional Theory of Within‐Group Conflict , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[15]  J. Krause,et al.  Does defection during predator inspection affect social structure in wild shoals of guppies? , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  D. Krakauer,et al.  Policing stabilizes construction of social niches in primates , 2006, Nature.

[17]  S. Balshine,et al.  Sex differences in rates of territory joining and inheritance in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[19]  S. Balshine,et al.  Sex differences in group-joining decisions in social fish , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  S. Balshine,et al.  Rules of engagement for resource contests in a social fish , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  H. Landau On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies: I. Effect of inherent characteristics , 1951 .

[22]  D. Heg,et al.  Strategic growth decisions in helper cichlids , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  S. Balshine,et al.  Liver size reveals social status in the African cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher. , 2009, Journal of fish biology.

[24]  D. Heg,et al.  Size differences within a dominance hierarchy influence conflict and help in a cooperatively breeding cichlid , 2005 .

[25]  Bernhard Voelkl,et al.  Social structure of primate interaction networks facilitates the emergence of cooperation , 2009, Biology Letters.

[26]  A. Lotem,et al.  Helping opportunities and space segregation in cooperatively breeding cichlids , 2003 .

[27]  S. Balshine,et al.  Dispersal patterns and status change in a co‐operatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher: evidence from microsatellite analyses and behavioural observations , 2004 .

[28]  Marian Y. L. Wong,et al.  predicts aggression in a social queue Fight for your breeding right: hierarchy re-establishment , 2011 .

[29]  A. Badyaev,et al.  Structure of Social Networks in a Passerine Bird: Consequences for Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Mating Strategies , 2010, The American Naturalist.

[30]  T. Monnin,et al.  Dominance hierarchy and reproductive conflicts among subordinates in a monogynous queenless ant , 1999 .

[31]  Filippo Aureli,et al.  Natural conflict resolution , 2000 .

[32]  Sean F. Hanser,et al.  Social network theory: new insights and issues for behavioral ecologists , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[33]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Sensitivity of MRQAP Tests to Collinearity and Autocorrelation Conditions , 2007, Psychometrika.

[34]  Richard W Wrangham,et al.  Dominance, aggression and testosterone in wild chimpanzees: a test of the ‘challenge hypothesis’ , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[35]  Jeremy Field,et al.  Individual Variation in Social Aggression and the Probability of Inheritance: Theory and a Field Test , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[36]  Gábor Csárdi,et al.  The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .

[37]  Roger Schürch,et al.  The building-up of social relationships: behavioural types, social networks and cooperative breeding in a cichlid , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  The influence of food competition and predation risk on size-assortative shoaling in juvenile chub (Leuciscus cephalus) , 2010 .

[39]  Tina W. Wey,et al.  Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[40]  R. Johnstone,et al.  Power Struggles, Dominance Testing, and Reproductive Skew , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[41]  M. Taborsky,et al.  Paying to stay or paying to breed? Field evidence for direct benefits of helping behavior in a cooperatively breeding fish , 1998 .

[42]  S. Balshine,et al.  Correlates of group size in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish (Neolamprologus pulcher) , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[43]  S. Balshine,et al.  The evolution of cooperative breeding in the African cichlid fish, Neolamprologus pulcher , 2011, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[44]  Bette A. Loiselle,et al.  Social networks in the lek-mating wire-tailed manakin (Pipra filicauda) , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  David B. McDonald,et al.  A social network perspective on measurements of dominance hierarchies , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  M. Taborsky,et al.  Dominant members of cooperatively-breeding groups adjust their behaviour in response to the sexes of their subordinates , 2009 .

[47]  David Krackhardt,et al.  PREDICTING WITH NETWORKS: NONPARAMETRIC MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF DYADIC DATA * , 1988 .

[48]  Paul Glendinning,et al.  The mathematics of motion camouflage , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  Brenda McCowan,et al.  Utility of social network analysis for primate behavioral management and well-being , 2008 .

[50]  Effect of unknown relationships on linearity, steepness and rank ordering of dominance hierarchies: Simulation studies based on data from wild monkeys , 2011, Behavioural Processes.

[51]  Paul J. B. Hart,et al.  The effects of kin and familiarity on interactions between fish , 2003 .

[52]  J. Silk,et al.  The benefits of social capital: close social bonds among female baboons enhance offspring survival , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[53]  M. Newman Analysis of weighted networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[54]  K. Chandrashekara,et al.  Queen succession in the primitively eusocial tropical waspRopalidia marginata (Lep.) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) , 1992, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[55]  L. Dugatkin,et al.  Essay on Contemporary Issues in Ethology: Behavioral Ecology and the Study of Partner Choice , 2010 .

[56]  S. Balshine,et al.  Effects of isotocin on social responses in a cooperatively breeding fish , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[57]  J. Krause,et al.  Exploring Animal Social Networks , 2008 .

[58]  Julian A. Drewe,et al.  The social network structure of a wild meerkat population: 2. Intragroup interactions , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[59]  J. Krause,et al.  Social network theory in the behavioural sciences: potential applications , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[60]  Richard James,et al.  Network structure and parasite transmission in a group living lizard, the gidgee skink, Egernia stokesii , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[61]  P. Bonacich Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[62]  D. Krakauer,et al.  Social Structure, Robustness, and Policing Cost in a Cognitively Sophisticated Species , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[63]  Han de Vries,et al.  An improved test of linearity in dominance hierarchies containing unknown or tied relationships , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[64]  S. Griffiths Learned recognition of conspecifics by fishes , 2003 .

[65]  H. Ohtsuki,et al.  A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks , 2006, Nature.

[66]  H. Kokko,et al.  The evolution of parental and alloparental effort in cooperatively breeding groups: when should helpers pay to stay? , 2002 .

[67]  M. Taborsky Broodcare helpers in the cichlid fish Lamprologus brichardi: Their costs and benefits , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[68]  M. Taborsky Breeder-Helper Conflict in a Cichlid Fish With Broodcare Helpers: an Experimental Analysis , 1985 .

[69]  J. S. Quinn,et al.  Evidence for size and sex‐specific dispersal in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[70]  K. N. Laland,et al.  Social structure and co-operative interactions in a wild population of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) , 2006, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[71]  J. Krause,et al.  Social organisation , 2022 .

[72]  Jan Lindström,et al.  Behavioural phenotype affects social interactions in an animal network , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[73]  Peter K. McGregor,et al.  Analyzing Animal Societies: Quantitative Methods for Vertebrate Social Analysis , 2009 .

[74]  P. Backwell,et al.  Residency and size affect fight duration and outcome in the fiddler crab Uca annulipes , 1996 .

[75]  R. Montgomerie,et al.  Female-mediated causes and consequences of status change in a social fish , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[76]  Daniel T. Blumstein,et al.  Social cohesion in yellow-bellied marmots is established through age and kin structuring , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[77]  Hilde Vervaecke,et al.  Measuring and testing the steepness of dominance hierarchies , 2006, Animal Behaviour.