Unoccupied Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Marine Ecosystem Restoration

Assessing, implementing and monitoring ecosystem restoration can be a labor intensive process, often short term (<3 years), and potentially destructive to the habitat. Advances in remote sensing technology are generating rapid, non-destructive methods for siting, executing and monitoring restoration efforts, particularly in fragile marine environments. Unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS), or drones, are a highly flexible method for accessing and remote sensing ecosystems with on-demand capabilities, greater resolution than sensors from satellites and occupied aircraft, and the ability to cover large areas quickly. With the variety of platforms and payloads available, UASs are providing a suite of tools for conservation practitioners to properly plan marine ecosystem restoration projects and evaluate their success. Both conventional and specialized sensors coupled with image processing techniques can be used to gauge impact to and recovery of entire ecological communities. For example, high-resolution, multispectral imaging allows for discernment of population changes across trophic levels, concurrent with the discrimination of species (including rare) across a landscape, and detection of vegetation stress. Structure from Motion photogrammetric processing provides centimeter-scale three-dimensional models of habitat structure to measure ecologically significant aspects like rugosity and assess their change through time. Water quality around a broad impacted area can be remotely monitored via a number of payloads before and after restoration. Additionally, specially designed payloads can be used to manually disperse seeds or materials for restoration applications without disturbing the habitat. UASs have increasing potential to reduce the costs (both time and money) associated with restoration efforts, making site assessment and long-term, broad-scale monitoring more achievable. Here we present a review of the applications of UASs in marine ecosystem restoration with an overview of the special considerations of using this technology in the marine environment.

[1]  D. Johnston,et al.  Shark detection probability from aerial drone surveys within a temperate estuary , 2020 .

[2]  Anna E. Windle,et al.  Deep learning for coastal resource conservation: automating detection of shellfish reefs , 2020, Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation.

[3]  Dominique Chabot,et al.  A standardized protocol for reporting methods when using drones for wildlife research , 2020 .

[4]  C. Winter,et al.  Accuracy of sand beach topography surveying by drones and photogrammetry , 2020, Geo-Marine Letters.

[5]  Walter I. Torres,et al.  MorphoMetriX: a photogrammetric measurement GUI for morphometric analysis of megafauna , 2020, J. Open Source Softw..

[6]  D. Johnston,et al.  Applying Unoccupied Aircraft Systems to Study Human Behavior in Marine Science and Conservation Programs , 2019, Front. Mar. Sci..

[7]  David W. Johnston,et al.  Rapid and Accurate Monitoring of Intertidal Oyster Reef Habitat Using Unoccupied Aircraft Systems and Structure from Motion , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[8]  Sébastien Lambot,et al.  A new drone-borne GPR for soil moisture mapping , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[9]  D. Johnston,et al.  Geomorphic response of inlet barrier islands to storms , 2019, Geomorphology.

[10]  G. Davenport,et al.  Evaluation of Stream and Wetland Restoration Using UAS-Based Thermal Infrared Mapping , 2019, Water.

[11]  G. Rieucau,et al.  Use of Drones in Fishery Science , 2019, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society.

[12]  H T Lally,et al.  Can drones be used to conduct water sampling in aquatic environments? A review. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  A. Yaney-Keller,et al.  Using Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) to assay mangrove estuaries on the Pacific coast of Costa Rica , 2019, PloS one.

[14]  C. Aricò,et al.  Coupled Electric and Hydraulic Control of a PRS Turbine in a Real Transport Water Network , 2019, Water.

[15]  David Belton,et al.  Methodological Ambiguity and Inconsistency Constrain Unmanned Aerial Vehicles as A Silver Bullet for Monitoring Ecological Restoration , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[16]  Colin D. Woodroffe,et al.  Assessing Reef-Island Shoreline Change Using UAV-Derived Orthomosaics and Digital Surface Models , 2019, Drones.

[17]  Jonathan P. Resop,et al.  Drone Laser Scanning for Modeling Riverscape Topography and Vegetation: Comparison with Traditional Aerial Lidar , 2019, Drones.

[18]  J. Leon,et al.  Estimating Mangrove Forest Volume Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning and UAV-Derived Structure-from-Motion , 2019, Drones.

[19]  Thomas Benzing,et al.  Environmental Monitoring Using a Drone-Enabled Wireless Sensor Network , 2019, 2019 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS).

[20]  Brian O'Connor,et al.  Analysis of Sentinel-2 and RapidEye for Retrieval of Leaf Area Index in a Saltmarsh Using a Radiative Transfer Model , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[21]  Kyle C. Cavanaugh,et al.  Mapping Coastal Wetland Biomass from High Resolution Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[22]  T. Sharma,et al.  Benefits and Challenges of UAS Imagery for Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Mapping in Small Estuaries of the Canadian West Coast , 2019, Journal of Coastal Research.

[23]  Margarita Mulero-Pázmány,et al.  Drones for Conservation in Protected Areas: Present and Future , 2019, Drones.

[24]  David W Johnston,et al.  Unoccupied Aircraft Systems in Marine Science and Conservation. , 2019, Annual review of marine science.

[25]  R. Díaz-Delgado,et al.  Rapid Assessment of Ecological Integrity for LTER Wetland Sites by Using UAV Multispectral Mapping , 2018, Drones.

[26]  David J. Klein,et al.  A convolutional neural network for detecting sea turtles in drone imagery , 2018, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[27]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Using Digital Surface Models from UAS Imagery of Fire Damaged Sphagnum Peatlands for Monitoring and Hydrological Restoration , 2018, Drones.

[28]  Margaret Kalacska,et al.  Freshwater Fish Habitat Complexity Mapping Using Above and Underwater Structure-From-Motion Photogrammetry , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[29]  Louise Tosetto,et al.  Drone-Based High-Resolution Tracking of Aquatic Vertebrates , 2018, Drones.

[30]  Fotis Foukalas,et al.  Wireless Communication Technologies for Safe Cooperative Cyber Physical Systems , 2018, Sensors.

[31]  M. Kelly,et al.  UAVs in Support of Algal Bloom Research: A Review of Current Applications and Future Opportunities , 2018, Drones.

[32]  M. Magnasco,et al.  Bottlenose Dolphins and Antillean Manatees Respond to Small Multi-Rotor Unmanned Aerial Systems , 2018, Front. Mar. Sci..

[33]  L. Torres,et al.  Drone Up! Quantifying Whale Behavior From a New Perspective Improves Observational Capacity , 2018, Front. Mar. Sci..

[34]  John R. Jensen,et al.  Small Unmanned Aerial Systems (sUAS) for environmental remote sensing: challenges and opportunities revisited , 2018, GIScience & Remote Sensing.

[35]  Daniele Ventura,et al.  Mapping and Classification of Ecologically Sensitive Marine Habitats Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery and Object-Based Image Analysis (OBIA) , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[36]  Jennifer J. Swenson,et al.  Integrating Drone Imagery into High Resolution Satellite Remote Sensing Assessments of Estuarine Environments , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[37]  Dominique Chabot,et al.  An Object-Based Image Analysis Workflow for Monitoring Shallow-Water Aquatic Vegetation in Multispectral Drone Imagery , 2018, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[38]  Johann Mourier,et al.  Using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) surveys and image analysis in the study of large surface-associated marine species: a case study on reef sharks Carcharhinus melanopterus shoaling behaviour. , 2018, Journal of fish biology.

[39]  Jarrod Trevathan,et al.  Smart Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Technologies (SEMAT)—A New Paradigm for Low-Cost, Remote Aquatic Environmental Monitoring , 2018, Sensors.

[40]  Mark Parsons,et al.  UAVs, Hyperspectral Remote Sensing, and Machine Learning Revolutionizing Reef Monitoring , 2018, Sensors.

[41]  R. Ormond,et al.  Are close-following and breaching behaviours by basking sharks at aggregation sites related to courtship? , 2018, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[42]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Issues in Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Data Collection of Complex Forest Environments , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[43]  Xiangliang Zhang,et al.  Use of unmanned aerial vehicles for efficient beach litter monitoring. , 2018, Marine pollution bulletin.

[44]  C. Peterson,et al.  Living shorelines enhanced the resilience of saltmarshes to Hurricane Matthew (2016). , 2018, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[45]  Giorgos Mallinis,et al.  On the Use of Unmanned Aerial Systems for Environmental Monitoring , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[46]  T. Tucker,et al.  Measuring behavioral responses of sea turtles, saltwater crocodiles, and crested terns to drone disturbance to define ethical operating thresholds , 2018, PloS one.

[47]  D. Johnston,et al.  Assessing the disturbance potential of small unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS) on gray seals (Halichoerus grypus) at breeding colonies in Nova Scotia, Canada , 2018, PeerJ.

[48]  A. Gallagher,et al.  Apex predatory sharks and crocodiles simultaneously scavenge a whale carcass , 2018, Journal of Ethology.

[49]  David G. Schmale,et al.  Tracking of a Fluorescent Dye in a Freshwater Lake with an Unmanned Surface Vehicle and an Unmanned Aircraft System , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[50]  Vicente Pérez-Muñuzuri,et al.  Extreme Wave Height Events in NW Spain: A Combined Multi-Sensor and Model Approach , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[51]  K. Lohmann,et al.  Quantifying Nearshore Sea Turtle Densities: Applications of Unmanned Aerial Systems for Population Assessments , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[52]  Julian Dale,et al.  Deploying Fixed Wing Unoccupied Aerial Systems (UAS) for Coastal Morphology Assessment and Management , 2017, Journal of Coastal Research.

[53]  G. Schofield,et al.  Detecting elusive aspects of wildlife ecology using drones: new insights on the mating dynamics and operational sex ratios of sea turtles , 2017 .

[54]  Douglas J. Krause,et al.  An accurate and adaptable photogrammetric approach for estimating the mass and body condition of pinnipeds using an unmanned aerial system , 2017, PloS one.

[55]  Chunyan Li,et al.  Photogrammetric UAV Mapping of Terrain under Dense Coastal Vegetation: An Object-Oriented Classification Ensemble Algorithm for Classification and Terrain Correction , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[56]  David Palma,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Vehicles as Data Mules: An Experimental Assessment , 2017, IEEE Access.

[57]  D. Johnston,et al.  Comparing occupied and unoccupied aircraft surveys of wildlife populations: assessing the gray seal (Halichoerus grypus) breeding colony on Muskeget Island, USA , 2017 .

[58]  M. Kalacska,et al.  Structure from motion will revolutionize analyses of tidal wetland landscapes , 2017 .

[59]  G. Schofield,et al.  Aerial and underwater surveys reveal temporal variation in cleaning-station use by sea turtles at a temperate breeding area , 2017 .

[60]  Lian Pin Koh,et al.  Drones count wildlife more accurately and precisely than humans , 2017, bioRxiv.

[61]  Higinio González-Jorge,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Systems for Civil Applications: A Review , 2017 .

[62]  J. Ridge,et al.  Salt Marsh and Fringing Oyster Reef Transgression in a Shallow Temperate Estuary: Implications for Restoration, Conservation and Blue Carbon , 2017, Estuaries and Coasts.

[63]  Margarita Mulero-Pázmány,et al.  Unmanned aircraft systems as a new source of disturbance for wildlife: A systematic review , 2017, PloS one.

[64]  Yong‐Gu Han,et al.  Possibility of applying unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and mapping software for the monitoring of waterbirds and their habitats , 2017 .

[65]  R. Moorhead,et al.  Mapping of invasive phragmites (common reed) in Gulf of Mexico coastal wetlands using multispectral imagery and small unmanned aerial systems , 2017 .

[66]  A. C. Seymour,et al.  Automated detection and enumeration of marine wildlife using unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) and thermal imagery , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[67]  D. Green,et al.  Application of Structure‐from‐Motion photogrammetry to river restoration , 2017 .

[68]  Antoine Collin,et al.  Mapping coral reefs using consumer-grade drones and structure from motion photogrammetry techniques , 2017, Coral Reefs.

[69]  Elena Hengstmann,et al.  Marine litter abundance and distribution on beaches on the Isle of Rügen considering the influence of exposition, morphology and recreational activities. , 2017, Marine pollution bulletin.

[70]  P. Rossini,et al.  The Fall of Sleep K-Complex in Alzheimer Disease , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[71]  Bin Zou,et al.  Satellite Based Mapping of Ground PM2.5 Concentration Using Generalized Additive Modeling , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[72]  Johann Mourier,et al.  Using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to investigate shark and ray densities in a shallow coral lagoon , 2016 .

[73]  James Higgins,et al.  A micro-UAS to Start Prescribed Fires , 2016, ISER.

[74]  Ved Chirayath,et al.  Drones that see through waves – preliminary results from airborne fluid lensing for centimetre-scale aquatic conservation , 2016 .

[75]  Mitchell D. Harley,et al.  UAVs for coastal surveying , 2016 .

[76]  Gregory P. Asner,et al.  Integrating technologies for scalable ecology and conservation , 2016 .

[77]  D. Orellana,et al.  UAV MONITORING FOR ENVIROMENTAL MANAGEMENT IN GALAPAGOS ISLANDS , 2016 .

[78]  S. Tesfamichael,et al.  WETLAND ASSESSMENT USING UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (UAV) PHOTOGRAMMETRY , 2016 .

[79]  Michael C. Hatfield,et al.  Unmanned aircraft systems in wildlife research: current and future applications of a transformative technology , 2016 .

[80]  Frédéric Pouget,et al.  Monitoring the Topography of a Dynamic Tidal Inlet Using UAV Imagery , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[81]  Paul J Conroy,et al.  Corrigendum: N-terminal domain of Bothrops asper Myotoxin II Enhances the Activity of Endothelin Converting Enzyme-1 and Neprilysin , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[82]  Giovanna Jona Lasinio,et al.  A low-cost drone based application for identifying and mapping of coastal fish nursery grounds , 2016 .

[83]  Jarrod C Hodgson,et al.  Precision wildlife monitoring using unmanned aerial vehicles , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[84]  R. Elsey,et al.  The Use of an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle to Locate Alligator Nests , 2016, Southeastern Naturalist.

[85]  M. C. Vogt,et al.  Research Article: Near-Remote Sensing of Water Turbidity Using Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems , 2016 .

[86]  Andrea Cavallaro,et al.  Sensor Capability and Atmospheric Correction in Ocean Colour Remote Sensing , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[87]  Monica Rivas Casado,et al.  Automated Identification of River Hydromorphological Features Using UAV High Resolution Aerial Imagery , 2015, Sensors.

[88]  R. Kays,et al.  Emerging Technologies to Conserve Biodiversity. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[89]  D. Bird,et al.  Wildlife research and management methods in the 21st century: Where do unmanned aircraft fit in?1 , 2015 .

[90]  Jonathan H. Grabowski,et al.  Maximizing oyster-reef growth supports green infrastructure with accelerating sea-level rise , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[91]  Julie Linchant,et al.  Are unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) the future of wildlife monitoring? A review of accomplishments and challenges , 2015 .

[92]  Patricia Chow-Fraser,et al.  Unmanned aerial vehicles produce high-resolution, seasonally-relevant imagery for classifying wetland vegetation , 2015 .

[93]  W. Perryman,et al.  Photogrammetry of killer whales using a small hexacopter launched at sea1 , 2015 .

[94]  J. Gonçalves,et al.  UAV photogrammetry for topographic monitoring of coastal areas , 2015 .

[95]  Alessandra Capolupo,et al.  Photogrammetry for environmental monitoring: the use of drones and hydrological models for detection of soil contaminated by copper. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[96]  Donald R. Cahoon,et al.  Estimating Relative Sea-Level Rise and Submergence Potential at a Coastal Wetland , 2015, Estuaries and Coasts.

[97]  V. Klemas,et al.  Coastal and Environmental Remote Sensing from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: An Overview , 2015 .

[98]  Lian Pin Koh,et al.  Free and open-access satellite data are key to biodiversity conservation , 2015 .

[99]  N. Lindquist,et al.  Classic paradigms in a novel environment: inserting food web and productivity lessons from rocky shores and saltmarshes into biogenic reef restoration , 2014 .

[100]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Satellite remote sensing for applied ecologists: opportunities and challenges , 2014 .

[101]  M. Kelly,et al.  Evaluation of sensor types and environmental controls on mapping biomass of coastal marsh emergent vegetation , 2014 .

[102]  J. Grabowski,et al.  Oyster reefs can outpace sea-level rise , 2014 .

[103]  M. Mulero-Pázmány,et al.  Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems as a Rhinoceros Anti-Poaching Tool in Africa , 2014, PloS one.

[104]  Marco Dubbini,et al.  Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) for High-Resolution Reconstruction of Topography: The Structure from Motion Approach on Coastal Environments , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[105]  C. Hladik,et al.  Salt Marsh Elevation and Habitat Mapping Using Hyperspectral and LIDAR Data , 2013 .

[106]  Karen Anderson,et al.  Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology , 2013 .

[107]  Chris J. Kennedy,et al.  The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services , 2011 .

[108]  Ryan R. Jensen,et al.  Small-Scale Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Environmental Remote Sensing: Challenges and Opportunities , 2011 .

[109]  M. Kearney,et al.  The Effects of Tidal Inundation on the Reflectance Characteristics of Coastal Marsh Vegetation , 2009 .

[110]  K. Wasson,et al.  Impacts and interactions of multiple human perturbations in a California salt marsh , 2008, Oecologia.

[111]  Carrie V. Kappel,et al.  A Global Map of Human Impact on Marine Ecosystems , 2008, Science.

[112]  C. Gratton,et al.  Restoration of Arthropod Assemblages in a Spartina Salt Marsh following Removal of the Invasive Plant Phragmites australis , 2005 .

[113]  Richard F. Ambrose,et al.  A Comparison of Remote Sensing and Ground‐Based Methods for Monitoring Wetland Restoration Success , 2003 .

[114]  P. V. Sundareshwar,et al.  RESPONSES OF COASTAL WETLANDS TO RISING SEA LEVEL , 2002 .

[115]  P. Adam Saltmarshes in a time of change , 2002, Environmental Conservation.

[116]  R. Sahoo,et al.  Hyperspectral Remote Sensing , 2013, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Geosciences.

[117]  Karen E. Joyce,et al.  Principles and practice of acquiring drone-based image data in marine environments , 2019, Marine and Freshwater Research.

[118]  Raymond R. Carthy,et al.  The potential of unmanned aerial systems for sea turtle research and conservation: A review and future directions , 2017 .

[119]  J. Leary,et al.  Enhancing Invasive Species Control with Unmanned Aerial Systems and Herbicide Ballistic Technology , 2017 .

[120]  Eva Husson,et al.  Images from unmanned aircraft systems for surveying aquatic and riparian vegetation , 2016 .

[121]  S. Silvestri,et al.  Hyperspectral remote sensing of salt marsh vegetation, morphology and soil topography , 2003 .