Bilateral comparison of femoral bone density and hip axis length from single and fan beam DXA scans

Dominant/nondominant differences in bone mineral density (BMD) have been observed in the upper extremities. However for the proximal femur, the distinction between dominant and nondominant hips is not clear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate left/right variations in femoral BMD and hip axis length (HAL) in both single beam and fan beam dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans. A total of 36 women aged 41–76 years (average age 60±10 years) received single beam and fan beam DXA scans of both proximal femora with a Hologic QDR-2000 scanner. Femoral BMD and hip axis length were determined for each scan. Left/right and single beam/fan beam correlations were determined and differences were evaluated using a two-way analysis of variance. Femoral BMD at corresponding measurement regions in opposing femora were highly correlated (r=0.81–0.96). No significant left/right differences were detected. At the femoral neck, the mean BMD difference (± standard deviation) was 1.5%±4.7% in a single beam mode and-0.6%±6.3% in fan beam mode. Though mean values of femoral BMD were equivalent, the observed individual left/right differences were occasionally large (as high as 26% in the femoral neck). The hip axis length of the left and right hips were highly correlated and statistically equivalent. However, hip axis length using fan beam was significantly larger (7.5%) than the single beam measurement with a larger observed variation. We conclude that measurement of a single proximal femur will usually be sufficient for clinical evaluation of BMD and/or hip axis length. However, bilateral BMD measurements are indicated in subjects where unilateral degeneration or disease are suspected. If possible, hip axis length should be measured in single beam mode to avoid magnification errors.

[1]  C C Glüer,et al.  Prediction of hip fractures from pelvic radiographs: The study of osteoporotic fractures , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[2]  J. Pouilles,et al.  Spine and femur densitometry at the menopause: Are both sites necessary in the assessment of the risk of osteoporosis? , 1993, Calcified Tissue International.

[3]  S. Cummings,et al.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures , 1993, The Lancet.

[4]  P. Ell,et al.  Variation between femurs as measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  B. Drinkwater,et al.  Site of bone density measurement may affect therapy decision , 1993, Calcified Tissue International.

[6]  Harry K. Genant,et al.  Cross-calibration of DXA equipment: Upgrading from a hologic QDR 1000/W to a QDR 2000 , 1993, Calcified Tissue International.

[7]  C C Glüer,et al.  Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture: The study of osteoporotic fractures , 1993, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[8]  J. Siegel,et al.  The Symmetry of Hip Bone Mineral Density: A Dual Photon Absorptiometry Approach , 1987, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[9]  F. Fahey,et al.  Comparison of bone mineral density in both hips. , 1988, Radiology.

[10]  W. O'Fallon,et al.  Long‐term fracture prediction by bone mineral assessed at different skeletal sites , 1993, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[11]  S. Cummings,et al.  Automated evaluation of hip axis length for predicting hip fracture , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[12]  D. Heath,et al.  Comparison and investigation of bone mineral density in opposing femora by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry , 1992, Osteoporosis International.