Serum GFAP and NfL Levels Differentiate Subsequent Progression and Disease Activity in Patients With Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Background and Objectives Neurodegeneration and astrocytic activation are pathologic hallmarks of progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) and can be quantified by serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP). We investigated sNfL and sGFAP as tools for stratifying patients with progressive MS based on progression and disease activity status. Methods We leveraged our Comprehensive Longitudinal Investigation of MS at the Brigham and Women's Hospital (CLIMB) natural history study, which includes clinical, MRI data and serum samples collected over more than 20 years. We included patients with MS with a confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score ≥3 that corresponds with our classifier for patients at high risk of underlying progressive pathology. We analyzed sNfL and sGFAP within 6 months from the confirmed EDSS score ≥3 corresponding with our baseline visit. Patients who further developed 6-month confirmed disability progression (6mCDP) were classified as progressors. We further stratified our patients into active/nonactive based on new brain/spinal cord lesions or relapses in the 2 years before baseline or during follow-up. Statistical analysis on log-transformed sGFAP/sNfL assessed the baseline association with demographic, clinical, and MRI features and associations with future disability. Results We included 257 patients with MS who had an average EDSS score of 4.0 and a median follow-up after baseline of 7.6 years. sNfL was higher in patients with disease activity in the 2 years before baseline (adjusted β = 1.21; 95% CI 1.04–1.42; p = 0.016), during the first 2 years of follow-up (adjusted β = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.01–1.36; p = 0.042). sGFAP was not increased in the presence of disease activity. Higher sGFAP levels, but not sNfL levels, were associated with higher risk of 6mCDP (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.71; 95% CI = 1.19–2.45; p = 0.004). The association was stronger in patients with low sNfL (adjusted HR = 2.44; 95% CI 1.32–4.52; p = 0.005) and patients who were nonactive in the 2 years prior or after the sample. Discussion Higher levels of sGFAP correlated with subsequent progression, particularly in nonactive patients, whereas sNfL reflected acute disease activity in patients with MS at high risk of underlying progressive pathology. Thus, sGFAP and sNfL levels may be used to stratify patients with progressive MS for clinical research studies and clinical trials and may inform clinical care.

[1]  L. Kappos,et al.  Blood Neurofilament Light in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis , 2022, Neurology.

[2]  S. Hauser,et al.  Multiple sclerosis: two decades of progress , 2022, Lancet Neurology.

[3]  D. Conen,et al.  Serum neurofilament light chain for individual prognostication of disease activity in people with multiple sclerosis: a retrospective modelling and validation study , 2022, The Lancet Neurology.

[4]  John K. Yue,et al.  Blood GFAP as an emerging biomarker in brain and spinal cord disorders , 2022, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[5]  Chunhua Shen,et al.  Serum Neurofilament Light and Multiple Sclerosis Progression Independent of Acute Inflammation , 2022, JAMA network open.

[6]  V. Yong,et al.  Mechanism-based criteria to improve therapeutic outcomes in progressive multiple sclerosis , 2021, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[7]  M. Dwyer,et al.  Measurement of neurofilaments improves stratification of future disease activity in early multiple sclerosis , 2021, Multiple sclerosis.

[8]  F. Barkhof,et al.  Serum Neurofilament Light Association With Progression in Natalizumab-Treated Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis , 2021, Neurology.

[9]  M. Sormani,et al.  Sustained reduction of serum neurofilament light chain over 7 years by alemtuzumab in early relapsing–remitting MS , 2021, Multiple sclerosis.

[10]  H. Zetterberg,et al.  The blood biomarkers puzzle – A review of protein biomarkers in neurodegenerative diseases , 2021, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  J. Bennett,et al.  Serum Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein: A Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder Biomarker , 2021, Annals of neurology.

[12]  L. Newby,et al.  Profiling serum neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein in primary progressive multiple sclerosis , 2021, Journal of Neuroimmunology.

[13]  R. Fox,et al.  Neurofilament light chain in a phase 2 clinical trial of ibudilast in progressive multiple sclerosis , 2021, Multiple sclerosis.

[14]  M. Freedman,et al.  Serum neurofilament light in MS: The first true blood-based biomarker? , 2021, Multiple sclerosis.

[15]  D. Arnold,et al.  Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis New Insights , 2021 .

[16]  H. Weiner,et al.  Blood neurofilament light: a critical review of its application to neurologic disease , 2020, Annals of clinical and translational neurology.

[17]  F. Quintana,et al.  The Role of Astrocytes in CNS Inflammation. , 2020, Trends in immunology.

[18]  S. Hauser,et al.  Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: A Review. , 2020, The American journal of medicine.

[19]  Mário João Fartaria,et al.  Serum GFAP in multiple sclerosis: correlation with disease type and MRI markers of disease severity , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[20]  S. Fereshtehnejad,et al.  Serum neurofilament light chain predicts long term clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[21]  D. Arnold,et al.  Contribution of Relapse-Independent Progression vs Relapse-Associated Worsening to Overall Confirmed Disability Accumulation in Typical Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis in a Pooled Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials , 2020, JAMA neurology.

[22]  L. Kappos,et al.  Plasma neurofilament light levels are associated with risk of disability in multiple sclerosis , 2020, Neurology.

[23]  L. Kappos,et al.  Blood neurofilament light levels segregate treatment effects in multiple sclerosis , 2020, Neurology.

[24]  J. Ragoussis,et al.  MAFG-driven astrocytes promote CNS inflammation , 2020, Nature.

[25]  T. Chitnis,et al.  A roadmap to precision medicine for multiple sclerosis , 2020, Multiple sclerosis.

[26]  J. Kira,et al.  Serum GFAP and neurofilament light as biomarkers of disease activity and disability in NMOSD , 2019, Neurology.

[27]  R. Henry,et al.  Association Between Serum Neurofilament Light Chain Levels and Long-term Disease Course Among Patients With Multiple Sclerosis Followed up for 12 Years. , 2019, JAMA neurology.

[28]  M. Ramanathan,et al.  Epidemiology and treatment of multiple sclerosis in elderly populations , 2019, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[29]  FDA approves new oral drug to treat multiple sclerosis , 2019, Case Medical Research.

[30]  S. Meuth,et al.  Glial Activation Markers in CSF and Serum From Patients With Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: Potential of Serum GFAP as Disease Severity Marker? , 2019, Front. Neurol..

[31]  L. Kappos,et al.  Blood neurofilament light chain as a biomarker of MS disease activity and treatment response , 2019, Neurology.

[32]  J. Correale,et al.  Impact of sex hormones on immune function and multiple sclerosis development , 2018, Immunology.

[33]  L. Airas,et al.  Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein correlates with multiple sclerosis disease severity , 2020, Multiple sclerosis.

[34]  L. Kappos,et al.  Neurofilament light chain serum levels correlate with 10‐year MRI outcomes in multiple sclerosis , 2018, Annals of clinical and translational neurology.

[35]  J. Kassubek,et al.  Serum GFAP as a biomarker for disease severity in multiple sclerosis , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[36]  Ludwig Kappos,et al.  Serum neurofilament as a predictor of disease worsening and brain and spinal cord atrophy in multiple sclerosis , 2018, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[37]  Ludwig Kappos,et al.  Siponimod versus placebo in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (EXPAND): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study , 2018, The Lancet.

[38]  Clare Baecher-Allan,et al.  Multiple Sclerosis: Mechanisms and Immunotherapy , 2018, Neuron.

[39]  David H. Miller,et al.  Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria , 2017, The Lancet Neurology.

[40]  J. Kassubek,et al.  GFAP in early multiple sclerosis: A biomarker for inflammation , 2017, Neuroscience Letters.

[41]  Pierre Grammond,et al.  Towards personalized therapy for multiple sclerosis: prediction of individual treatment response , 2017, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[42]  Ludwig Kappos,et al.  Serum Neurofilament light: A biomarker of neuronal damage in multiple sclerosis , 2017, Annals of neurology.

[43]  K. Blennow,et al.  Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers as a measure of disease activity and treatment efficacy in relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis , 2017, Journal of neurochemistry.

[44]  K. Blennow,et al.  Glial and neuronal markers in cerebrospinal fluid in different types of multiple sclerosis , 2016, Journal of Neuroimmunology.

[45]  Pierre Grammond,et al.  Defining secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. , 2016, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[46]  F. Jacques Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: The 2013 revisions , 2015, Neurology.

[47]  B. Trapp,et al.  Pathological mechanisms in progressive multiple sclerosis , 2015, The Lancet Neurology.

[48]  Aaron E Miller,et al.  Diagnostic uncertainty during the transition to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis , 2014, Multiple sclerosis.

[49]  F. Lublin,et al.  New Multiple Sclerosis Phenotypic Classification , 2014, European Neurology.

[50]  G. Francis,et al.  Fingolimod (FTY720): discovery and development of an oral drug to treat multiple sclerosis , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[51]  M. Sofroniew,et al.  Astrocytes: biology and pathology , 2009, Acta Neuropathologica.

[52]  H. Weiner,et al.  The challenge of multiple sclerosis: How do we cure a chronic heterogeneous disease? , 2009, Annals of neurology.

[53]  Susan A Gauthier,et al.  A model for the comprehensive investigation of a chronic autoimmune disease: the multiple sclerosis CLIMB study. , 2006, Autoimmunity reviews.

[54]  A. Minagar,et al.  Pathogenesis of brain and spinal cord atrophy in multiple sclerosis. , 2004 .

[55]  C. Polman,et al.  Markers for different glial cell responses in multiple sclerosis: clinical and pathological correlations. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[56]  W. L. Benedict,et al.  Multiple Sclerosis , 2007, Journal - Michigan State Medical Society.