Comparative study of non-invasive force and stress inference methods in tissue

In the course of animal development, the shape of tissue emerges in part from mechanical and biochemical interactions between cells. Measuring stress in tissue is essential for studying morphogenesis and its physical constraints. For that purpose, a possible new approach is force inference (up to a single prefactor) from cell shapes and connectivity. It is non-invasive and can provide space-time maps of stress in a whole tissue, unlike existing methods. To validate this approach, three force-inference methods, which differ in their approach of treating indefiniteness in an inverse problem between cell shapes and forces, were compared. Tests using two artificial and two experimental data sets consistently indicate that our Bayesian force inference, by which cell-junction tensions and cell pressures are simultaneously estimated, performs best in terms of accuracy and robustness. Moreover, by measuring the stress anisotropy and relaxation, we cross-validated the force inference and the global annular ablation of tissue, each of which relies on different prefactors. A practical choice of force-inference methods in different systems of interest is discussed.Graphical abstract

[1]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Collective cell guidance by cooperative intercellular forces , 2010, Nature materials.

[2]  Lars Hufnagel,et al.  Supplementary Information for Mechanical Stress Inference for Two Dimensional Cell Arrays , 2012 .

[3]  Faming Liang,et al.  Statistical and Computational Inverse Problems , 2006, Technometrics.

[4]  Yasuji Sawada,et al.  Improving the realism of the cellular Potts model in simulations of biological cells , 2003 .

[5]  T. Lecuit,et al.  Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[6]  A. Mccarthy Development , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[7]  Francois Graner,et al.  Foam in a two-dimensional Couette shear: a local measurement of bubble deformation , 2005, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[8]  K. Weber,et al.  Widespread occurrence of intermediate filaments in invertebrates; common principles and aspects of diversion. , 1989 .

[9]  José M. Bernardo,et al.  Bayesian Statistics , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[10]  M. Krieg,et al.  Tensile forces govern germ-layer organization in zebrafish , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[11]  H. Honda Geometrical models for cells in tissues. , 1983, International review of cytology.

[12]  D. Boal,et al.  Mechanics of the cell , 2001 .

[13]  G. Batchelor,et al.  The stress system in a suspension of force-free particles , 1970, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  G. Edwards,et al.  Forces for Morphogenesis Investigated with Laser Microsurgery and Quantitative Modeling , 2003, Science.

[15]  Takashi Hiiragi,et al.  Computer simulation of emerging asymmetry in the mouse blastocyst , 2008, Development.

[16]  D'arcy W. Thompson,et al.  On Growth and Form , 1917, Nature.

[17]  Frank Jülicher,et al.  Cell Flow Reorients the Axis of Planar Polarity in the Wing Epithelium of Drosophila , 2010, Cell.

[18]  Frank Jülicher,et al.  Cell flow and tissue polarity patterns. , 2011, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[19]  Pierre-François Lenne,et al.  Nature and anisotropy of cortical forces orienting Drosophila tissue morphogenesis , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[20]  Yasuji Sawada,et al.  Can Surface Adhesion Drive Cell Rearrangement? Part II: A Geometrical Model , 1993 .

[21]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Flying through the Drosophila Cytoskeletal Genome , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[22]  M. Gonzalez-Gaitan,et al.  The missing link: implementation of morphogenetic growth control on the cellular and molecular level. , 2011, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[23]  David Bilder,et al.  Expanding the morphogenetic repertoire: perspectives from the Drosophila egg. , 2012, Developmental cell.

[24]  François Graner,et al.  Cell adhesion and cortex contractility determine cell patterning in the Drosophilaretina , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Sriram Narasimhan,et al.  Video force microscopy reveals the mechanics of ventral furrow invagination in Drosophila , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Vladimir Kovalevsky,et al.  Curvature in Digital 2D Images , 2001, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[27]  Pierre-François Lenne,et al.  Force generation, transmission, and integration during cell and tissue morphogenesis. , 2011, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[28]  P. Gennes The Physics Of Foams , 1999 .

[29]  S. Eaton,et al.  Mechanics and remodelling of cell packings in epithelia , 2010, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.

[30]  C. Aegerter,et al.  Determination of mechanical stress distribution in Drosophila wing discs using photoelasticity , 2009, Mechanisms of Development.

[31]  S. Hilgenfeldt,et al.  Physical modeling of cell geometric order in an epithelial tissue , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Frank Jülicher,et al.  The Influence of Cell Mechanics, Cell-Cell Interactions, and Proliferation on Epithelial Packing , 2007, Current Biology.

[33]  M. Nahmad,et al.  Spatiotemporal mechanisms of morphogen gradient interpretation. , 2011, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[34]  Yanlan Mao,et al.  Planar polarization of the atypical myosin Dachs orients cell divisions in Drosophila. , 2011, Genes & development.

[35]  Emeric Bron,et al.  Pectin-Induced Changes in Cell Wall Mechanics Underlie Organ Initiation in Arabidopsis , 2011, Current Biology.

[36]  Philippe Marcq,et al.  Mechanical Control of Morphogenesis by Fat/Dachsous/Four-Jointed Planar Cell Polarity Pathway , 2012, Science.

[37]  Simon Cox,et al.  Foams: Structure and Dynamics , 2013 .

[38]  Philippe Marcq,et al.  Mechanical state, material properties and continuous description of an epithelial tissue , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[39]  Kaoru Sugimura,et al.  Bayesian inference of force dynamics during morphogenesis. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[40]  Emmanuel Farge,et al.  Tissue deformation modulates twist expression to determine anterior midgut differentiation in Drosophila embryos. , 2008, Developmental cell.

[41]  J. Zallen,et al.  Dynamics and regulation of contractile actin-myosin networks in morphogenesis. , 2011, Current opinion in cell biology.

[42]  Olivier Sire,et al.  Introducing the scanning air puff tonometer for biological studies. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[43]  G. Charras,et al.  Characterizing the mechanics of cultured cell monolayers , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  M. Stein,et al.  Epithelia as bubble rafts: a new method for analysis of cell shape and intercellular adhesion in embryonic and other epithelia. , 1982, Journal of theoretical biology.

[45]  Kenneth A. Brakke,et al.  The Surface Evolver , 1992, Exp. Math..

[46]  B. Garra,et al.  Elastography: Ultrasonic imaging of tissue strain and elastic modulus in vivo , 1996 .