Remote teaching data-driven physical modeling through a COVID-19 open-ended data challenge

Physics can be seen as a conceptual approach to scientific problems, a method for discovery, but teaching this aspect of our discipline can be a challenge. We report on a first-time remote teaching experience for a computational physics third-year physics laboratory class taught in the first part of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic (March–May 2020). To convey a ‘physics of data’ approach to data analysis and data-driven physical modeling we used interdisciplinary data sources, with an openended ‘COVID-19 data challenge’ project as the core of the course. COVID-19 epidemiological data provided an ideal setting for motivating the students to deal with complex problems, where there is no unique or preconceived solution. Our results indicate that such problems yield qualitatively different improvements compared to close-ended projects, as well as point to critical aspects in using these problems as a teaching strategy. By breaking the students’ expectations of unidirectionality, remote teaching provided unexpected opportunities to promote active work and active learning.

[1]  A. Rădulescu,et al.  Management strategies in a SEIR-type model of COVID 19 community spread , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[2]  Calling Bullshit: The Art of Skepticism in a Data-Driven World , 2020, Science.

[3]  Shana K. Carpenter,et al.  On Students’ (Mis)judgments of Learning and Teaching Effectiveness , 2020, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition.

[4]  H. V. Ribeiro,et al.  City size and the spreading of COVID-19 in Brazil , 2020, PloS one.

[5]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Spread and dynamics of the COVID-19 epidemic in Italy: Effects of emergency containment measures , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  P. Colaneri,et al.  Modelling the COVID-19 epidemic and implementation of population-wide interventions in Italy , 2020, Nature Medicine.

[7]  C. Whittaker,et al.  Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[8]  Andrew J. Stier,et al.  Early pandemic COVID-19 case growth rates increase with city size , 2020, npj Urban Sustainability.

[9]  N. Wilson,et al.  Case-Fatality Risk Estimates for COVID-19 Calculated by Using a Lag Time for Fatality , 2020, Emerging infectious diseases.

[10]  E. Dong,et al.  An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[11]  Hiroshi Nishiura,et al.  Communicating the Risk of Death from Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.

[12]  Barbara Lockee,et al.  The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning , 2020 .

[13]  M. Lercher,et al.  Night science , 2019, Genome Biology.

[14]  T. Atherton,et al.  Developing a project-based computational physics course grounded in expert practice , 2016, 1604.06122.

[15]  L. Hansson,et al.  Working with the nature of science in physics class: turning ‘ordinary’ classroom situations into nature of science learning situations , 2016 .

[16]  L. Movileanu,et al.  Physical Models of Living Systems , 2016 .

[17]  Erin L. Dolan,et al.  We must teach more effectively: here are four ways to get started , 2015, Molecular biology of the cell.

[18]  Ellen T. Kamp,et al.  Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle , 2015 .

[19]  Marco Cosentino Lagomarsino,et al.  Soft bounds on diffusion produce skewed distributions and Gompertz growth. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  Barbara Means,et al.  Learning Online: What Research Tells Us About Whether, When and How , 2014 .

[21]  Bruno Bassetti,et al.  Evidence for soft bounds in Ubuntu package sizes and mammalian body masses , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Rebecca Walker,et al.  Can inquiry‐based learning strengthen the links between teaching and disciplinary research? , 2010 .

[23]  John L. Hubisz.  Cliff's Nodes: Editorials from The Physics Teacher: Clifford Swartz , 2008 .

[24]  Norman Chonacky,et al.  Integrating computation into the undergraduate curriculum: A vision and guidelines for future developments , 2008 .

[25]  Robert G. Fuller,et al.  Numerical Computations in US Undergraduate Physics Courses , 2006, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[26]  Angela Brew,et al.  Teaching and research: new relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education , 2003 .

[27]  R. A. Engle,et al.  Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners Classroom , 2002 .

[28]  P. David Pearson,et al.  The instruction of reading comprehension , 1983 .

[29]  Tobias J. Hagge,et al.  Physics , 1929, Nature.