Comparing the effects of titanium alloy and chrome cobalt in removable partial denture connectors on tooth mobility, bone loss and tissue reaction

Abstract Introduction: Major connectors are used with removable partial dentures to connect all other parts to the denture. The use of titanium to fabricate removable partial dentures has recently increased. Objective: This study aimed to assess the effect of the titanium alloy and chrome cobalt to fabricate connectors of removable partial dentures on tooth mobility, bone loss and tissue reaction. Materials and methods: A non-randomized clinical-controlled trial was conducted at the Dental Clinic, Faculty of Dentistry at Al-Azhar University-Assiut Branch, from January 2013 to January 2015. Eighty patients were classified into two groups, which were provided with removable partial dentures comprising titanium alloy and chrome cobalt connectors respectively. Patients’ demographic and clinical data (tooth mobility, bone loss and tissue reaction) were evaluated via the questionnaires, and clinical observations by qualified medical dentists with panoramic X-rays. Both groups were examined at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Results: Tooth mobility, in all directions, ranged between 0 mm at enrollment and 0.10 mm in the titanium alloy group and ranged from 0 mm to 0.20 mm in the chrome cobalt group. The difference in tooth mobility between the two groups at the end of the study was statistically significant (p = 0.04). The bone loss ranged from 0 mm at enrollment and 0.05 mm in the titanium alloy group and ranged from 0.04 mm to 0.15 mm in the chrome cobalt group. The difference in bone loss between the two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.01). The tissue reaction in the titanium alloy group ranged from 0 to 0.02, and it ranged from 0 to 0.16 in the chrome cobalt group. The difference in tissue reaction was statistically significant (p = 0.02). Conclusion: Clinical observations suggest that titanium alloy is more suited than chrome cobalt for fabricating the major connectors in removable partial dentures.

[1]  C. Lynch,et al.  Quality of written communication and master impressions for fabrication of removable partial prostheses in the Kingdom of Bahrain. , 2007, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[2]  S. Offenbacher,et al.  Mechanical debridement of subgingival biofilm in participants with asymptomatic third molars does not reduce deeper probing depths in the molar regions of the mouth. , 2013, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[3]  Paul Kaplan.  Flexible partial denture variations. The use of circumferential, combination, and continuous clasp designs. , 2012, Dentistry today.

[4]  R. Ribeiro,et al.  Comparative study of circumferential clasp retention force for titanium and cobalt-chromium removable partial dentures. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[5]  R. Mosharraf,et al.  Evaluation of tissue reaction to some denture-base materials: an animal study. , 2008, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[6]  Mitsuo Niinomi,et al.  Recent research and development in titanium alloys for biomedical applications and healthcare goods , 2003 .

[7]  D. Benson,et al.  A clinical evaluation of removable partial dentures with I-bar retainers. Part I. , 1979, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  J. Rintanen,et al.  Titanium framework removable partial denture used for patient allergic to other metals: a clinical report and literature review. , 1995, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  R. Phoenix,et al.  Casting titanium partial denture frameworks: a radiographic evaluation. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  P. Miller,et al.  A classification of marginal tissue recession. , 1985, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[11]  G. Schmalz,et al.  Biological interactions of dental cast alloys with oral tissues. , 2002, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[12]  J. Brudvik,et al.  Clinical evaluation of patients eight to nine years after placement of removable partial dentures. , 1984, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[13]  E. Budtz-Jørgensen,et al.  Periodontal conditions following treatment with distally extending cantilever bridges or removable partial dentures in elderly patients. A 5-year study. , 1990, Journal of periodontology.

[14]  C. Lynch,et al.  The teaching of removable partial dentures in Ireland and the United Kingdom , 2007, BDJ.

[15]  John Emsley,et al.  Nature's building blocks : an A-Z guide to the elements , 2001 .

[16]  G. Mumcu,et al.  Prevalence and distribution of oral lesions: a cross-sectional study in Turkey. , 2005, Oral diseases.

[17]  M. Devan.  Basic principles in impression making. 1952. , 2005, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  G. B. Pelleu,et al.  The effect of various clasping systems on the mobility of abutment teeth for distal-extension removable partial dentures. , 1979, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[19]  B. Benson,et al.  Comparison of titanium and cobalt-chromium removable partial denture clasps. , 1997, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[20]  M. Devan.  Basic principles in impression making. , 1948, The New York state dental journal.