Abstract The results of medical laboratory testing are only useful if they lead to appropriate actions by medical practitioners and/or patients. An underappreciated component of the medical testing process is the transfer of the information from the laboratory report into the reader’s brain. The format of laboratory reports can be determined by the testing laboratory, which may issue a formatted report, or by electronic systems receiving information from laboratories and controlling the report format. As doctors can receive information from many laboratories, interpreting information from reports in a safe and rapid manner is facilitated by having similar report layouts and formats. Using Australia as an example, there is a wide variation in report formats in spite of a body of work to define standards for reporting. In addition to standardising of report formats, consideration needs to be given to optimisation of report formatting to facilitate rapid and unambiguous reading of the report and also interpretation of the data. Innovative report formats have been developed by some laboratories; however, wide adoption has not followed. The need to balance uniformity of reporting with appropriate innovation is a challenge for safe reporting of laboratory results. This paper discusses the current status and opportunity for improvement in safety and efficiency of the reading of laboratory reports, using current practise and developments in Australia as examples.
[1]
John D O'Connor,et al.
Reducing post analytical error: perspectives on new formats for the blood sciences pathology report.
,
2015,
The Clinical biochemist. Reviews.
[2]
Jacob Solomon,et al.
Graphics help patients distinguish between urgent and non-urgent deviations in laboratory test results
,
2016,
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..
[3]
Callum G. Fraser,et al.
Biological Variation: From Principles to Practice
,
2001
.
[4]
T. Badrick,et al.
Safe reading of chemical pathology reports: the RCPAQAP Report Assessment Survey.
,
2016,
Pathology.
[5]
E Raik.
Error rates in Australian chemical pathology laboratories
,
1996,
The Medical journal of Australia.
[6]
D. Kahneman.
Thinking, Fast and Slow
,
2011
.
[7]
N. Franklin,et al.
Diagnostic error in internal medicine.
,
2005,
Archives of internal medicine.
[8]
B. Miller,et al.
Improving Diagnosis in Health Care.
,
2016,
Military medicine.
[9]
Mario Plebani,et al.
Harmonization in laboratory medicine: Requests, samples, measurements and reports
,
2016,
Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences.