The Lisbon process and bench-learning

skilled at creating, acquiring and transferring knowledge, and at modifying its behavior to reflect new knowledge and insights? It becomes relevant to talk about bench-learning that fosters generative learning, which rather than copying antiquated practices is preparing for the future.

[1]  Caroline E. Geck.  Doing Business , 2008 .

[2]  John L. Campbell,et al.  National Identity and the Varieties of Capitalism: The Danish Experience , 2006 .

[3]  T. Wilthagen,et al.  Adaptive and Reflexive Governance: The Limits of Organized Decentralization , 2005 .

[4]  M. Lodge.  The importance of being modern: international benchmarking and national regulatory innovation1 , 2005 .

[5]  Graham Room *.  POLICY BENCHMARKING IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: , 2005 .

[6]  P. Kirby.  Globalization, the Celtic Tiger and social outcomes: is Ireland a model or a mirage? , 2004 .

[7]  Claudio M. Radaelli,et al.  The diffusion of regulatory impact analysis – Best practice or lesson‐drawing? , 2004 .

[8]  P. Cerny,et al.  Globalisation and public policy under New Labour , 2004 .

[9]  Paul Marginson,et al.  What can ‘benchmarking’ offer the open method of co-ordination? , 2004 .

[10]  Paula Kyrö,et al.  Revising the concept and forms of benchmarking , 2003 .

[11]  Bob Jessop,et al.  Governance and Metagovernance: On Reflexivity, Requisite Variety, and Requisite Irony. , 2003 .

[12]  C. Radaelli.  The open method of coordination: a new governance architecture for the European Union? , 2003 .

[13]  R. Auluck,et al.  Benchmarking: a tool for facilitating organizational learning? , 2002 .

[14]  Caroline de la Porte,et al.  Social Benchmarking, Policy Making and New Governance in the Eu , 2001 .

[15]  K. Dyson.  The Politics of the Euro-Zone: Stability or Breakdown? , 2000 .

[16]  P. Bjerregaard,et al.  Mortality and life expectancy in Denmark and in other European countriesWhat is happening to middle-aged Danes? , 2000 .

[17]  Faizul Huq,et al.  Benchmarking – best practices: an integrated approach , 1999 .

[18]  Pervaiz K. Ahmed,et al.  Integrated benchmarking: a holistic examination of select techniques for benchmarking analysis , 1998 .

[19]  B. Jessop.  The rise of governance and the risks of failure: the case of economic development , 1998 .

[20]  P. Cerny,et al.  Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamics of Political Globalization , 1997, Government and Opposition.

[21]  C. Crouch.  Industrial Relations And European State Traditions , 1994 .

[22]  Philippe C. Schmitter,et al.  Still the Century of Corporatism? , 1974, The Review of Politics.

[23]  A. Moore,et al.  Facing the Challenge , 2007 .

[24]  E. Sørensen.  Local Politicians and Administrators as Metagovernors , 2007 .

[25]  Jochen Schulz zur Wiesch,et al.  Wie sozial ist Europa? Eine Kurzstudie zur sozialen Lage in der EU , 2006 .

[26]  U. Becker,et al.  Employment 'Miracles' : A Critical Comparison of the Dutch, Scandinavian, Swiss, Australian and Irish Cases versus Germany and the US , 2005 .

[27]  B. Lundvall,et al.  International benchmarking as a policy learning tool , 2002 .

[28]  W. Salverda.  Is there more to the Dutch miracle than a lot of part-time jobs? , 1999 .

[29]  R. Rose.  Lesson-drawing in public policy , 1993 .

[30]  Renate Mayntz,et al.  Governing Failures and the Problem of Governability: Some Comments on a Theoretical Paradigm , 1993 .