Strategic Responses to Environmental Regulation in the U.K. Automotive Sector: The European Union End‐of‐Life Vehicle Directive and the Porter Hypothesis

Summary As of 1 January 2006 all automotive OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) and component manufacturers operating within the European Union will need to comply with the End-of-Life Vehicle Directive (referred to hereafter as the EU ELV Directive). The EU ELV Directive compels all OEMs to take back and dismantle all motor vehicles for domestic use at the end of their useful lives. Each component part will then be either reused or recycled. To this end, the ultimate goal of the EU ELV Directive is that all motor vehicles for domestic use will have a reuse or recyclable content of 85% at the end of their useful lives, moving toward 95% by 2015. The burden of the EU ELV Directive falls on both the OEMs and their component manufacturers, forcing them to innovate and “design for disassembly.” This being the case, it offers a unique real world example with which to test the Porter Hypothesis. Porter asserts that strict, correctly formulated environmental regulation can offer a firm secondary benefits through improved product design and the reduction of waste. This in turn allows the firm to offset the cost of compliance. Because the EU ELV Directive has been fashioned to force firms into a process of innovation and redesign, the magnitude of these so-called offsets can be judged. This article employs Rugman and Verbeke's 1998 strategic matrix of firm response to environmental regulation to examine qualitative details of the strategic response of automotive component manufacturers and OEMs in the United Kingdom to the demands of the directive to judge the volume of offsets generated. This analysis shows no support for the Porter Hypothesis and challenges the assumptions of Rugman and Verbeke's model.

[1]  Eric Masanet,et al.  Product recovery with some byte: an overview of management challenges and environmental consequences in reverse manufacturing for the computer industry , 2003 .

[2]  Wolfgang Grimm,et al.  Reuse of Electric Motors in Consumer Products , 1998 .

[3]  Mark P. Sharfman,et al.  Regulation, Business, and Sustainable Development , 2000 .

[4]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Eco-efficiency, asset recovery and remanufacturing , 1997 .

[5]  S. Fineman.  Constructing the Green Manager , 1997 .

[6]  A. Crane.  Corporate Greening as Amoralization , 2000 .

[7]  Askiner Gungor,et al.  Issues in environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery: a survey , 1999 .

[8]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us? , 1995 .

[9]  M. Toffel.  The Growing Strategic Importance of End-of-Life Product Management , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[10]  P. Shrivastava,et al.  Greening organizations 2000 , 1994 .

[11]  Wallace E. Oates,et al.  Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm? , 1995 .

[12]  M. Porter,et al.  Industrial Ecology and Competitiveness , 1998 .

[13]  John McGee,et al.  Commentary on ‘corporate strategies and environmental regulations: an organizing framework’ by A. M. Rugman and A. Verbeke , 1998 .

[14]  Johan Albrecht,et al.  Environmental Regulation, Comparative Advantage and the Porter Hypothesis , 1998 .

[15]  Carsten Nagel,et al.  Caught between ecology and economy: end-of-life aspects of environmentally conscious manufacturing , 1999 .

[16]  Andrew King,et al.  Are aliens green? Assessing foreign establishments' environmental conduct in the United states , 2001 .

[17]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[18]  Noan Walley,et al.  It's not easy being green , 1994 .

[19]  Judith Petts,et al.  THE CLIMATE AND CULTURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE WITHIN SMEs , 1999 .

[20]  Ad J. de Ron,et al.  Disassembly and recycling of electronic consumer products: an overview , 1995 .

[21]  Alain Verbeke,et al.  Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: an organizing framework , 1998 .

[22]  Lester B. Lave,et al.  Recycling Postconsumer Nylon Carpet , 1998 .

[23]  I. Chaston,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT IN DEVON AND CORNWALL'S SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISE SECTOR , 1994 .

[24]  Alain Verbeke,et al.  Six cases of corporate strategic responses to environmental regulation , 2000 .

[25]  Gyula Vastag,et al.  Strategic programming for environmental management: Sonoco's take-back policy , 1997 .

[26]  Michael T. Rock,et al.  Impact of Firm‐Based Environmental Standards on Subsidiaries and Their Suppliers: Evidence from Motorola‐Penang , 2006 .