How does the energy-consuming rights trading policy affect China's carbon emission intensity?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Shuhong Wang,et al. Global value chains and carbon emission reduction in developing countries: Does industrial upgrading matter? , 2022, Environmental Impact Assessment Review.
[2] Kangyin Dong,et al. How financial inclusion affects the collaborative reduction of pollutant and carbon emissions: The case of China , 2022, Energy Economics.
[3] Xiaojing Yi,et al. Can the Financial Industry ‘Anchor’ Carbon Emission Reductions?— The Mediating and Moderating Effects of the Technology Market , 2022, Energy & Environment.
[4] Shixiang Li,et al. The Effect Evaluation of China’s Energy-Consuming Right Trading Policy: Empirical Analysis Based on PSM-DID , 2021, Sustainability.
[5] Debin Fang,et al. Potential gains from energy quota trading in China: From the perspective of comparison with command-and-control policy , 2021 .
[6] Ying Han,et al. Energy quota trading can achieve energy savings and emission reduction: evidence from China’s pilots , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
[7] D. Reiner,et al. European Industrial Energy Intensity: Innovation, Environmental Regulation, and Price Effects , 2020 .
[8] M. Song,et al. Global value chains, technological progress, and environmental pollution: Inequality towards developing countries. , 2020, Journal of environmental management.
[9] Jan Rosenow,et al. Evaluating the Polish White Certificate scheme , 2020 .
[10] Chao Fang,et al. Constructing energy-consuming right trading system for China's manufacturing industry in 2025 , 2020 .
[11] Yifei Zhang,et al. The effect of emission trading policy on carbon emission reduction: Evidence from an integrated study of pilot regions in China , 2020 .
[12] Ying Ji,et al. A study of environmental regulation, technological innovation, and energy consumption in China based on spatial econometric models and panel threshold models , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
[13] Kerui Du,et al. How does environmental regulation promote technological innovations in the industrial sector? Evidence from Chinese provincial panel data , 2020, Energy Policy.
[14] Morakinyo O. Adetutu,et al. Carbon Tax and Energy Intensity: Assessing the Channels of Impact using UK Microdata , 2020 .
[15] Weixian Wei,et al. Coordinating technological progress and environmental regulation in CO2 mitigation: The optimal levels for OECD countries & emerging economies , 2020 .
[16] Jian Xu,et al. Energy price and cost induced innovation: Evidence from China , 2020 .
[17] Shuhong Wang,et al. Drivers of carbon emission transfer in China-An analysis of international trade from 2004 to 2011. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.
[18] W. Gu,et al. Energy technological progress, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from China , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.
[19] Yu Pei,et al. Environmental regulation and carbon emission: The mediation effect of technical efficiency , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.
[20] Peter Corcoran,et al. Blockchain in Energy Efficiency: Potential Applications and Benefits , 2019, Energies.
[21] A. Trianni,et al. A multi-stakeholder analysis of the economic efficiency of industrial energy efficiency policies: Empirical evidence from ten years of the Italian White Certificate Scheme , 2019, Applied Energy.
[22] Xiongfeng Pan,et al. Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, technological innovation and energy efficiency based on large scale provincial panel data in China , 2017, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
[23] H. Folmer,et al. Revisiting cross-province energy intensity convergence in China: A spatial panel analysis , 2018, Energy Policy.
[24] M. Song,et al. Energy constraints, green technological progress and business profit ratios: evidence from big data of Chinese enterprises , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..
[25] Jan Stede,et al. Bridging the industrial energy efficiency gap – Assessing the evidence from the Italian white certificate scheme , 2017 .
[26] Jun Liu,et al. The emissions reduction effect and technical progress effect of environmental regulation policy tools , 2017 .
[27] Qiao-Mei Liang,et al. An empirical analysis of the green paradox in China: From the perspective of fiscal decentralization , 2017 .
[28] Zhi Li,et al. Technology advance and the carbon dioxide emission in China – Empirical research based on the rebound effect , 2017 .
[29] Minjun Shi,et al. Multiple environmental policies and pollution haven hypothesis: Evidence from China's polluting industries , 2017 .
[30] Yi-Ming Wei,et al. Potential gains from carbon emissions trading in China: A DEA based estimation on abatement cost savings , 2016 .
[31] Afshin Afshari,et al. Framework for Energy Efficiency White Certificates in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi , 2015 .
[32] André Schaffrin,et al. Toward a Comparative Measure of Climate Policy Output , 2015 .
[33] Joseph S. Shapiro,et al. Why is Pollution from U.S. Manufacturing Declining? The Roles of Trade, Regulation, Productivity, and Preferences , 2015, SSRN Electronic Journal.
[34] Rolf Färe,et al. Potential gains from trading bad outputs: The case of U.S. electric power plants , 2014 .
[35] Richard Kneller,et al. Environmental regulations and innovation activity in UK manufacturing industries , 2012 .
[36] S. Kumbhakar,et al. The effect of environmental regulations on Swiss farm productivity , 2012 .
[37] Frank A. Felder,et al. Comparison of energy efficiency incentive programs: Rebates and white certificates , 2010 .
[38] Petra Moser,et al. Compulsory Licensing: Evidence from the Trading with the Enemy Act , 2009 .
[39] M. Porter,et al. Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .