How does the energy-consuming rights trading policy affect China's carbon emission intensity?

[1]  Shuhong Wang,et al.  Global value chains and carbon emission reduction in developing countries: Does industrial upgrading matter? , 2022, Environmental Impact Assessment Review.

[2]  Kangyin Dong,et al.  How financial inclusion affects the collaborative reduction of pollutant and carbon emissions: The case of China , 2022, Energy Economics.

[3]  Xiaojing Yi,et al.  Can the Financial Industry ‘Anchor’ Carbon Emission Reductions?— The Mediating and Moderating Effects of the Technology Market , 2022, Energy & Environment.

[4]  Shixiang Li,et al.  The Effect Evaluation of China’s Energy-Consuming Right Trading Policy: Empirical Analysis Based on PSM-DID , 2021, Sustainability.

[5]  Debin Fang,et al.  Potential gains from energy quota trading in China: From the perspective of comparison with command-and-control policy , 2021 .

[6]  Ying Han,et al.  Energy quota trading can achieve energy savings and emission reduction: evidence from China’s pilots , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[7]  D. Reiner,et al.  European Industrial Energy Intensity: Innovation, Environmental Regulation, and Price Effects , 2020 .

[8]  M. Song,et al.  Global value chains, technological progress, and environmental pollution: Inequality towards developing countries. , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[9]  Jan Rosenow,et al.  Evaluating the Polish White Certificate scheme , 2020 .

[10]  Chao Fang,et al.  Constructing energy-consuming right trading system for China's manufacturing industry in 2025 , 2020 .

[11]  Yifei Zhang,et al.  The effect of emission trading policy on carbon emission reduction: Evidence from an integrated study of pilot regions in China , 2020 .

[12]  Ying Ji,et al.  A study of environmental regulation, technological innovation, and energy consumption in China based on spatial econometric models and panel threshold models , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[13]  Kerui Du,et al.  How does environmental regulation promote technological innovations in the industrial sector? Evidence from Chinese provincial panel data , 2020, Energy Policy.

[14]  Morakinyo O. Adetutu,et al.  Carbon Tax and Energy Intensity: Assessing the Channels of Impact using UK Microdata , 2020 .

[15]  Weixian Wei,et al.  Coordinating technological progress and environmental regulation in CO2 mitigation: The optimal levels for OECD countries & emerging economies , 2020 .

[16]  Jian Xu,et al.  Energy price and cost induced innovation: Evidence from China , 2020 .

[17]  Shuhong Wang,et al.  Drivers of carbon emission transfer in China-An analysis of international trade from 2004 to 2011. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  W. Gu,et al.  Energy technological progress, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from China , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[19]  Yu Pei,et al.  Environmental regulation and carbon emission: The mediation effect of technical efficiency , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[20]  Peter Corcoran,et al.  Blockchain in Energy Efficiency: Potential Applications and Benefits , 2019, Energies.

[21]  A. Trianni,et al.  A multi-stakeholder analysis of the economic efficiency of industrial energy efficiency policies: Empirical evidence from ten years of the Italian White Certificate Scheme , 2019, Applied Energy.

[22]  Xiongfeng Pan,et al.  Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, technological innovation and energy efficiency based on large scale provincial panel data in China , 2017, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[23]  H. Folmer,et al.  Revisiting cross-province energy intensity convergence in China: A spatial panel analysis , 2018, Energy Policy.

[24]  M. Song,et al.  Energy constraints, green technological progress and business profit ratios: evidence from big data of Chinese enterprises , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[25]  Jan Stede,et al.  Bridging the industrial energy efficiency gap – Assessing the evidence from the Italian white certificate scheme , 2017 .

[26]  Jun Liu,et al.  The emissions reduction effect and technical progress effect of environmental regulation policy tools , 2017 .

[27]  Qiao-Mei Liang,et al.  An empirical analysis of the green paradox in China: From the perspective of fiscal decentralization , 2017 .

[28]  Zhi Li,et al.  Technology advance and the carbon dioxide emission in China – Empirical research based on the rebound effect , 2017 .

[29]  Minjun Shi,et al.  Multiple environmental policies and pollution haven hypothesis: Evidence from China's polluting industries , 2017 .

[30]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Potential gains from carbon emissions trading in China: A DEA based estimation on abatement cost savings , 2016 .

[31]  Afshin Afshari,et al.  Framework for Energy Efficiency White Certificates in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi , 2015 .

[32]  André Schaffrin,et al.  Toward a Comparative Measure of Climate Policy Output , 2015 .

[33]  Joseph S. Shapiro,et al.  Why is Pollution from U.S. Manufacturing Declining? The Roles of Trade, Regulation, Productivity, and Preferences , 2015, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[34]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Potential gains from trading bad outputs: The case of U.S. electric power plants , 2014 .

[35]  Richard Kneller,et al.  Environmental regulations and innovation activity in UK manufacturing industries , 2012 .

[36]  S. Kumbhakar,et al.  The effect of environmental regulations on Swiss farm productivity , 2012 .

[37]  Frank A. Felder,et al.  Comparison of energy efficiency incentive programs: Rebates and white certificates , 2010 .

[38]  Petra Moser,et al.  Compulsory Licensing: Evidence from the Trading with the Enemy Act , 2009 .

[39]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .