Fluidic actuators for separation control at the engine/wing junction

Purpose The area behind the engine/wing junction of conventional civil aircraft configurations with underwing-mounted turbofans is susceptible to local flow separation at high angles of attack, which potentially impacts maximum lift performance of the aircraft. This paper aims to present the design, testing and optimization of two distinct systems of fluidic actuation dedicated to reduce separation at the engine/wing junction. Design/methodology/approach Active flow control applied at the unprotected leading edge inboard of the engine pylon has shown considerable potential to alleviate or even eliminate local flow separation, and consequently regain maximum lift performance. Two actuator systems, pulsed jet actuators with and without net mass flux, are tested and optimized with respect to an upcoming large-scale wind tunnel test to assess the effect of active flow control on the flow behavior. The requirements and parameters of the flow control hardware are set by numerical simulations of project partners. Findings The results of ground test show that full modulation of the jets of the non-zero mass flux actuator is achieved. In addition, it could be shown that the required parameters can be satisfied at design mass flow, and that pressure levels are within bounds. Furthermore, a new generation of zero-net mass flux actuators with improved performance is presented and described. This flow control system includes the actuator devices, their integration, as well as the drive and control electronics system that is used to drive groups of actuators. Originality/value The originality is given by the application of the two flow control systems in a scheduled large-scale wind tunnel test.

[1]  Websiteburo Overview of Onera Actuators for Active Flow Control , 2015 .

[2]  U. Ingard,et al.  Acoustic Circulation Effects and the Nonlinear Impedance of Orifices , 1950 .

[3]  A. Crook,et al.  Measurements and visualisations of synthetic jets , 2001 .

[4]  Israel J Wygnanski,et al.  The control of flow separation by periodic excitation , 2000 .

[5]  Jochen Wild,et al.  Numerical Studies of Active Flow Control Applied at the Engine-Wing Junction , 2014 .

[6]  Louis N. Cattafesta,et al.  Actuators for Active Flow Control , 2011 .

[7]  Wolfgang Nitsche,et al.  High-Lift Performance Investigation of a Two-Element Configuration with a Two-Stage Actuator System , 2014 .

[8]  A. Crook,et al.  The development and implementation of synthetic jets for the control of separated flow , 1999 .

[9]  Ralf Rudnik,et al.  Low Speed Validation Tests on Engine/Airframe Integration Within the EC Project EUROLIFT II , 2005 .

[10]  Wolfgang Nitsche,et al.  Experiments on Active Drag Reduction on a Complex Outer Wing Model , 2015 .

[11]  A. Glezer,et al.  Vectoring and small-scale motions effected in free shear flows using synthetic jet actuators , 1997 .

[12]  Ralf Rudnik Stall Behaviour of the EUROLIFT High Lift Configurations , 2008 .

[13]  Hassan M. Nagib,et al.  Control Techniques for Flows with Large Separated Regions: A New Look at Scaling Parameters , 2006 .

[14]  D. C. McCormick,et al.  BOUNDARY LAYER SEPARATION CONTROL WITH DIRECTED SYNTHETIC JETS , 2000 .

[15]  Sanjay Garg,et al.  Development of Piezoelectric Actuators for Active Flow Control , 2001 .

[16]  L. Prandtl,et al.  The Mechanics of Viscous Fluids , 1935 .

[17]  Peter Eliasson,et al.  CFD-Prediction of Maximum-Lift-Effects on Realistic High-Lift-Commercial-Aircraft-Configurations within the European Project EUROLIFT II , 2007 .

[18]  I. Wygnanski,et al.  Oscillatory Blowing: A Tool to Delay Boundary-Layer Separation , 1993 .