Mode of Action (MOA) Assignment Classifications for Ecotoxicology: An Evaluation of Approaches.

The mode of toxic action (MOA) is recognized as a key determinant of chemical toxicity and as an alternative to chemical class-based predictive toxicity modeling. However, MOA classification has never been standardized in ecotoxicology, and a comprehensive comparison of classification tools and approaches has never been reported. Here we critically evaluate three MOA classification methodologies using an aquatic toxicity data set of 3448 chemicals, compare the approaches, and assess utility and limitations in screening and early tier assessments. The comparisons focused on three commonly used tools: Verhaar prediction of toxicity MOA, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ASsessment Tool for Evaluating Risk (ASTER) QSAR (quantitative structure activity relationship) application, and the EPA Mode of Action and Toxicity (MOAtox) database. Of the 3448 MOAs predicted using the Verhaar scheme, 1165 were classified by ASTER, and 802 were available in MOAtox. Of the subset of 432 chemicals with MOA assignments for each of the three schemes, 42% had complete concordance in MOA classification, and there was no agreement for 7% of the chemicals. The research shows the potential for large differences in MOA classification between the five broad groups of the Verhaar scheme and the more mechanism-based assignments of ASTER and MOAtox. Harmonization of classification schemes is needed to use MOA classification in chemical hazard and risk assessment more broadly.

[1]  Daniel L Villeneuve,et al.  Adverse outcome pathways: A conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment , 2010, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[2]  Manuela Pavan,et al.  Review of (Quantitative) Structure–Activity Relationships for Acute Aquatic Toxicity , 2008 .

[3]  J C Madden,et al.  Classification of chemicals according to mechanism of aquatic toxicity: an evaluation of the implementation of the Verhaar scheme in Toxtree. , 2008, Chemosphere.

[4]  J. Hermens,et al.  Classifying environmental pollutants , 1992 .

[5]  Andrew Worth,et al.  Regulatory assessment of chemical mixtures: Requirements, current approaches and future perspectives. , 2016, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[6]  G. Veith,et al.  Structure-activity relationships for screening organic chemicals for potential ecotoxicity effects. , 1984, Drug metabolism reviews.

[7]  S. Endo,et al.  Application of the Activity Framework for Assessing Aquatic Ecotoxicology Data for Organic Chemicals , 2015 .

[8]  Mark T D Cronin,et al.  Investigation of the Verhaar scheme for predicting acute aquatic toxicity: improving predictions obtained from Toxtree ver. 2.6. , 2015, Chemosphere.

[9]  Jie Shen,et al.  Comparison of Cramer classification between Toxtree, the OECD QSAR Toolbox and expert judgment. , 2015, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[10]  A. Kienzler,et al.  Waiving chronic fish tests: possible use of acute-to-chronic relationships and interspecies correlations , 2016 .

[11]  J. Bailar,et al.  Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[12]  S. Bradbury,et al.  Predicting modes of toxic action from chemical structure: an overview. , 1994, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[13]  D Mackay,et al.  A model for p-aminobenzoic acid ester narcosis in goldfish. , 1985, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[14]  G. Patlewicz,et al.  An evaluation of the implementation of the Cramer classification scheme in the Toxtree software , 2008, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[15]  T M Martin,et al.  MOAtox: A comprehensive mode of action and acute aquatic toxicity database for predictive model development. , 2015, Aquatic toxicology.

[16]  Steve Gutsell,et al.  It is time to develop ecological thresholds of toxicological concern to assist environmental hazard assessment , 2015, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[17]  T M Martin,et al.  Comparison of global and mode of action-based models for aquatic toxicity , 2015, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[18]  John F Carriger,et al.  A Bayesian network model for predicting aquatic toxicity mode of action using two dimensional theoretical molecular descriptors. , 2016, Aquatic toxicology.

[19]  Gilman D. Veith,et al.  Structure-Toxicity Relationships for Industrial Chemicals Causing Type (II) Narcosis Syndrome , 1987 .

[20]  Amy Beasley,et al.  Stepwise Information-Filtering Tool (SIFT): A method for using risk assessment metadata in a nontraditional way. , 2015, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[21]  Alan R. Boobis,et al.  IPCS Framework for Analyzing the Relevance of a Noncancer Mode of Action for Humans , 2008, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[22]  Douglas M. Young,et al.  Prediction of Aquatic Toxicity Mode of Action Using Linear Discriminant and Random Forest Models , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[23]  Richard W. Carlson,et al.  Polar Narcosis in Aquatic Organisms , 1989 .