Quality of documentation of electronic medical information systems at primary health care units in Alexandria, Egypt.

Limited data are available about the implementation of electronic records systems in primary care in developing countries. The present study aimed to assess the quality of documentation in the electronic medical records at primary health care units in Alexandria, Egypt and to elicit physician's feedback on barriers and facilitators to the system. Data were collected at 7 units selected randomly from each administrative region and in each unit 50 paper-based records and their corresponding e-records were randomly selected for patients who visited the unit in the first 3 months of 2011. Administrative data were almost complete in both paper and e-records, but the completeness of clinical data varied between 60.0% and 100.0% across different units and types of record. The accuracy rate of the main diagnosis in e-records compared with paper-based records ranged between 44.0% and 82.0%. High workload and system complexity were the most frequently mentioned barriers to implementation of the e-records system.

[1]  Jack Tsai,et al.  A comparison of electronic records to paper records in mental health centers. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[2]  Michael Boland,et al.  What factors affect the use of electronic patient records by Irish GPs? , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[3]  Blackford Middleton,et al.  Measuring the quality of medical records: a method for comparing completeness and correctness of clinical encounter data , 2001, AMIA.

[4]  A. Boonstra,et al.  Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions , 2010, BMC health services research.

[5]  H. Lærum,et al.  Doctors' use of electronic medical records systems in hospitals: cross sectional survey , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Gustav Mikkelsen,et al.  Concordance of information in parallel electronic and paper based patient records , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[7]  I. Sallam Health care in Egypt , 1998, The Lancet.

[8]  M. Stewart,et al.  Implementing electronic health records: Key factors in primary care. , 2008, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[9]  Janet M. Corrigan,et al.  Key Capabilities of an Electronic Health Record System: Letter Report , 2004 .

[10]  T. R. Ward Implementing a gatekeeper system to strengthen primary care in Egypt: pilot study. , 2010, Eastern Mediterranean health journal = La revue de sante de la Mediterranee orientale = al-Majallah al-sihhiyah li-sharq al-mutawassit.

[11]  Lisa P. Newmark,et al.  Trends in Primary Care Clinician Perceptions of a New Electronic Health Record , 2009, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[12]  Ellen Balka,et al.  Beyond Individual Patient Care: Enhanced Use of EMR Data in a Primary Care Setting , 2011, ITCH.

[13]  J. Scherger,et al.  An international physician education program to support the recent introduction of family medicine in Egypt. , 2004, Family medicine.

[14]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  Physicians and electronic health records: a statewide survey. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  Steven R Simon,et al.  Electronic health records: use, barriers and satisfaction among physicians who care for black and Hispanic patients. , 2009, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[16]  J. Hippisley-Cox,et al.  The electronic patient record in primary care—regression or progression? A cross sectional study , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  Jürgen Stausberg,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Comparing Paper-based with Electronic Patient Records: Lessons Learned during a Study on Diagnosis and Procedure Codes , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[18]  Jesse C. Crosson,et al.  Electronic Medical Records Are Not Associated With Improved Documentation in Community Primary Care Practices , 2011, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[19]  Arun Vishwanath,et al.  Article Health Informatics Journal ••••• , 2022 .

[20]  I. Sim,et al.  Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. , 2004, Health affairs.

[21]  M Pringle,et al.  Assessment of the completeness and accuracy of computer medical records in four practices committed to recording data on computer. , 1995, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[22]  Uno Fors,et al.  What they fill in today, may not be useful tomorrow: Lessons learned from studying Medical Records at the Women hospital in Tabriz, Iran , 2008, BMC public health.

[23]  J. Farhan,et al.  Documentation and coding of medical records in a tertiary care center: a pilot study , 2005, Annals of Saudi medicine.

[24]  Axel Ekkernkamp,et al.  Comparison of handheld computer-assisted and conventional paper chart documentation of medical records. A randomized, controlled trial. , 2004, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American volume.

[25]  Luiz Augusto Facchini,et al.  Health information technology in primary health care in developing countries: a literature review. , 2004, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.