Continuous self-report of engagement to live solo marimba performance

ABSTRACT Laboratory-controlled experiments have demonstrated that expressive bodily movement (or lack thereof) can contribute positively (or negatively) to assessments of marimba performance. The experiment reported here investigates audience continuous self-report engagement responses gathered via the portable Audience Response Facility (pARF). The stimulus material was a solo marimba piece performed in a live concert. A female musician performed two musically similar sections within the piece in two different performance manners (deadpan and projected). The second-order standard deviation threshold method analysed signal reliability. As hypothesised, mean engagement responses were greater in the projected sample than the deadpan sample. Reliable signal was only observed in the projected sample. Difference between deadpan and projected sample mean engagement responses may be due to expressive bodily movement from the performance manner manipulation; alternatively, an order effect may be responsible. Experimentation in ecologically valid settings enables understanding of audience perception of music performance as it unfolds in time.

[1]  Clifford K. Madsen,et al.  The Experience of Musical Tension: A Replication of Nielsen's Research Using the Continuous Response Digital Interface , 1993 .

[2]  I. Peretz,et al.  Exposure effects on music preference and recognition , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[3]  B. Moore.  An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing , 1977 .

[4]  Jane W. Davidson,et al.  What Does the Visual Information Contained in Music Performances Offer the Observer? Some Preliminary Thoughts , 1995 .

[5]  C. Krumhansl,et al.  Cross-modal interactions in the perception of musical performance , 2006, Cognition.

[6]  J. Davidson.  Understanding the expressive movements of a solo pianist , 2002 .

[7]  R. Buck,et al.  Communication of affect through facial expressions in humans. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  C. Stevens,et al.  Music, movement and marimba: an investigation of the role of movement and gesture in communicating musical expression to an audience , 2009 .

[9]  J. Davidson,et al.  Gender and Race Bias in the Judgement of Western Art Music Peiformance , 2003 .

[10]  John M. Geringer.  Continuous Loudness Judgments of Dynamics in Recorded Music Excerpts , 1995 .

[11]  S. Thompson.  Determinants of listeners' enjoyment of a performance , 2007 .

[12]  R. Zajonc.  Mere Exposure: A Gateway to the Subliminal , 2001 .

[13]  J. Reeve,et al.  Enhancing Students' Engagement by Increasing Teachers' Autonomy Support , 2004 .

[14]  S. Thompson.  Audience responses to a live orchestral concert , 2006 .

[15]  C. Krumhansl.  A Perceptual Analysis of Mozart's Piano Sonata K. 282: Segmentation, Tension, and Musical Ideas , 1996 .

[16]  J. Davidson.  Visual Perception of Performance Manner in the Movements of Solo Musicians , 1993 .

[17]  Frank A. Russo,et al.  Seeing music performance: Visual influences on perception and experience , 2005 .

[18]  E. Skinner,et al.  Sense of Relatedness as a Factor in Children's Academic Engagement and Performance. , 2003 .

[19]  S. Kuwano,et al.  Continuous judgment of level-fluctuating sounds and the relationship between overall loudness and instantaneous loudness , 1985, Psychological research.

[20]  A. Friberg,et al.  Visual Perception of Expressiveness in Musicians' Body Movements , 2007 .

[21]  Charles A. Elliott.  Race and Gender as Factors in Judgments of Musical Performance. , 1996 .

[22]  Marcelo M. Wanderley,et al.  The Musical Significance of Clarinetists' Ancillary Gestures: An Exploration of the Field , 2005 .

[23]  Michael Schutz,et al.  Hearing Gestures, Seeing Music: Vision Influences Perceived Tone Duration , 2007, Perception.