A Brain Imaging Study of Procedural Choice

We study the behavior of subjects facing choices between certain, risky, partially ambiguous, and ambiguous lotteries in an experimentally controlled environment. Our observations are the choice behavior, the response time, and the brain activations of the subjects. Choices were simple enough to insure consistent behavior with small amount of noise. The behavioral evidence supports the idea that subjects face the choice task as an estimation of the value of the two lotteries and that some measure of the difficulty of the choice provides an important explanatory variable (together with risk and ambiguity aversion) for the observed behavior. The Neuro-imaging data suggest that the estimation is of approximate nature, and involves mental faculties that are independent of language and shared by all mammals. The regions in the brain that are activated are not located in frontal structures, which are known to be involved in planning, but in parietal regions typically involved in approximate calculations. The time to decide is shorter for seemingly harder choices, a Þnding that suggests the need for new models of the allocation of effort in the choice process. Emotional factors seem to play a minor role in the choice.

[1]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Topographical Layout of Hand, Eye, Calculation, and Language-Related Areas in the Human Parietal Lobe , 2002, Neuron.

[2]  M E Phelps,et al.  Positron emission tomography. , 1979, Medical instrumentation.

[3]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  The Role of Parietal Cortex in Verbal Working Memory , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  P. Broca,et al.  Remarques sur le siege de la faculte du langage articule suivies d'une observation d'aphemie , 1861 .

[5]  S. Dehaene Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[6]  A. Sirigu,et al.  Differential amygdala responses to winning and losing: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in humans , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[7]  A. Owen Cognitive planning in humans: Neuropsychological, neuroanatomical and neuropharmacological perspectives , 1997, Progress in Neurobiology.

[8]  T. Shallice From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure: References , 1988 .

[9]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Cerebral activations during number multiplication and comparison: a PET study , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Language and number: a bilingual training study , 2001, Cognition.

[11]  E. Koechlin,et al.  Dissociating the role of the medial and lateral anterior prefrontal cortex in human planning. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  D. LeBihan,et al.  Modulation of Parietal Activation by Semantic Distance in a Number Comparison Task , 2001, NeuroImage.

[13]  T. Shallice Specific impairments of planning. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[14]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[16]  C. Bundesen A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[17]  D. Ellsberg Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .

[18]  M. Raichle,et al.  Searching for a baseline: Functional imaging and the resting human brain , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  E. Spelke,et al.  Sources of mathematical thinking: behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. , 1999, Science.

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Human Brain Function , 1997 .

[21]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Auditory Selective Attention: An fMRI Investigation , 1996, NeuroImage.