The effect of spelling-to-sound regularity on naming in French

SummaryIn two experiments the naming task was used to investigate the effect of spelling-to-sound regularity on performance for French words varying in frequency of usage. In both experiments the results showed a significant effect of regularity on naming latencies. Contrary to what has been found in previous experiments using English stimuli, the regularity effect did not vary as a function of word frequency. However, in both experiments significantly more errors, and specifically regularisation errors, were observed with low-frequency irregular words. Several possible interpretations of this atypical pattern of results are discussed. An additional observation was that the regularity effect, both on naming latencies and on error rates, and independently of frequency of use, was limited to the irregular words in which the idiosyncratic orthographic segment was either in initial or in medial position in the word.

[1]  L. Katz,et al.  Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: a multilingual comparison. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[3]  Mark S. Seidenberg.  The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems , 1985, Cognition.

[4]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition , 1984 .

[5]  Julie E. Boland,et al.  Priming in pronunciation: Beyond pattern recognition and onset latency , 1989 .

[6]  L. Katz,et al.  Relation between pronunciation and recognition of printed words in deep and shallow orthographies. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  R. W. Zandvoort.  Rules of pronunciation for the English language. An account of the relationship between English spelling and pronunciation: Axel Wijk, (Language and Language Learning 12.) London: Oxford University Press. 1966. 160 pp. Price 8s. 6d. net , 1967 .

[8]  M. Rosson.  The interaction of pronunciation rules and lexical representations in reading aloud , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Paul R. Hanna,et al.  Phoneme-grapheme correspondences as cues to spelling improvement , 1966 .

[10]  L. Henderson.  Orthography and Word Recognition in Reading , 1982 .

[11]  John B. Carroll,et al.  The American Heritage Word Frequency Book , 1971 .

[12]  M. Coltheart.  Lexical access in simple reading tasks , 1978 .

[13]  G. Waters,et al.  Children’s and adults’ use of spelling-sound information in three reading tasks , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Acquisition and use of spelling-sound correspondences in reading , 1984 .

[15]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time-course and decision criteria , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[16]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. , 1987 .

[17]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[18]  S. Andrews.  Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent? , 1982 .

[19]  M T Turvey,et al.  Lexical decision in a phonologically shallow orthography , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Roger W. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Frequency and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical decision tasks. , 1987 .

[21]  Janice Kay,et al.  One Process, Not Two, in Reading Aloud: Lexical Analogies Do the Work of Non-Lexical Rules , 1981 .

[22]  Gordon D. A. Brown.  Resclving inconsistency: A computational model of word naming , 1987 .