Monitoring vegetation cover across semi-arid regions: Comparison of remote observations from various scales

Realistic parameterization of land surface processes must take into account heterogeneities in the land surface. In the case of a sparse canopy, interpretation of remotely sensed measurements is very difficult and somewhat questionable in attempts to relate the vegetation indices (VIs) to fractional vegetation cover information. This paper provides an intercomparison of satellite observations at different scales for the purpose of assessing and monitoring vegetation changes at a regional scale. It is designed (1) to evaluate the level of association that can be expected from a model relating basic tools such as spectrally derived VIs from AVHRR and green biomass data for a set of heterogeneous surfaces in a representative semi-arid region and (2) to determine the best strategy for using satellite imagery in that context. The quantitative relationships between radiation data collected in space and characteristics of land surfaces are investigated in the context of the HAPEX-Sahel study over the Niger. A north-south vegetation gradient was accurately located and documented. Corresponding SPOT data, acquired on the same day for the same test site, at 20m spatial resolution were then resampled to the plate carree projection for comparison with National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (NOAA AVHRR) HRPT data (1km spatial resolution). This processing helped in the description and full interpretation of the evolution of various vegetation indices derived from NOAA AVHRR data on these semi-arid regions. One outcome of the data processing is that the resulting relationship between spectral indices and the effective biomass is found to be nonlinear within our low biomass range. When this scheme is applied to NOAA AVHRR data, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), the Modified Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (MSAVI) and the Global Environment Monitoring Index (GEMI) appear to provide detailed information about biomass evolution. However, the accuracy is somewhat different depending on the fractional vegetation cover value. Strategies to estimate information on green biomass in semi-arid regions are different depending on the vegetation index used. In order to use the NDVI or MSAVI properly at the surface level, we have no choice but to perform carefully prepared atmospheric corrections. This data preprocessing is not necessary for the GEMI, which is computed without the need for any atmospheric corrections.

[1]  Y. H. Kerr,et al.  Critical assessment of vegetation indices from AVHRR in a semi-arid environment , 1996 .

[2]  Bernard Pinty,et al.  Evaluation of the performance of various vegetation indices to retrieve vegetation cover from AVHRR data , 1994 .

[3]  G. Dedieu,et al.  SMAC: a simplified method for the atmospheric correction of satellite measurements in the solar spectrum , 1994 .

[4]  J. Monteith.  SOLAR RADIATION AND PRODUCTIVITY IN TROPICAL ECOSYSTEMS , 1972 .

[5]  J.-P. Goutorbe,et al.  HAPEX-Sahel: a large-scale study of land-atmosphere interactions in the semi-arid tropics , 1994 .

[6]  B. Choudhury,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity in vegetation canopies and remote sensing of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation: A modeling study , 1992 .

[7]  Garik Gutman,et al.  Vegetation indices from AVHRR: An update and future prospects , 1991 .

[8]  Michel Desbois,et al.  Rainfall estimation in the Sahel: the EPSAT-NIGER experiment , 1992 .

[9]  R. Myneni,et al.  Atmospheric effects and spectral vegetation indices , 1994 .

[10]  P. Deschamps,et al.  Description of a computer code to simulate the satellite signal in the solar spectrum : the 5S code , 1990 .

[11]  A. S. Belward,et al.  Scale considerations in vegetation monitoring using AVHRR data , 1992 .

[12]  A. Huete,et al.  A Modified Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index , 1994 .

[13]  Janet Franklin,et al.  Estimating foliage and woody biomass in Sahelian and Sudanian woodlands using a remote sensing model , 1991 .

[14]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Evaluation of simplified procedures for retrieval of land surface reflectance factors from satellite sensor output , 1992 .

[15]  R. Saunders.  The determination of broad band surface albedo from AVHRR visible and near-infrared radiances , 1990 .

[16]  Bernard Pinty,et al.  Towards a quantitative interpretation of vegetation indices Part 1: Biophysical canopy properties and classical indices , 1993 .

[17]  A. J. Richardsons,et al.  DISTINGUISHING VEGETATION FROM SOIL BACKGROUND INFORMATION , 1977 .

[18]  Yann Kerr,et al.  Geographical, biological and remote sensing aspects of the hydrologic atmospheric pilot experiment in the sahel (HAPEX-Sahel) , 1995 .

[19]  A. Huete.  A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) , 1988 .

[20]  C. Valentin,et al.  Land surface conditions of the Niamey region: ecological and hydrological implications , 1997 .

[21]  J. F. O'Callaghan,et al.  The application of Landsat image data to rangeland assessment and monitoring: the development and demonstration of a land image-based resource information system (LIBRIS) , 1986 .

[22]  Nadine Gobron,et al.  Optical remote sensing of vegetation: Modeling, caveats, and algorithms , 1995 .

[23]  Jean-Philippe Gastellu-Etchegorry,et al.  Relating the Global Vegetation Index to net primary productivity and actual evapotranspiration over Africa , 1993 .