Non-power law scaling for access to the H-mode in tokamaks via symbolic regression

The power threshold (PThresh) to access the H-mode in tokamaks remains a subject of active research, because up to now no theoretical relation has proved to be general enough to reliably interpret the L–H transition. Over the last few decades, much effort has therefore been devoted to deriving empirical scalings, assuming ‘a priori’ a power-law model structure. In this paper, an empirical scaling of PThresh without any a priori assumption about the model structure, i.e. about the functional form, is derived. Symbolic regression via genetic programming is applied to the latest version multi-machine International Tokamak Physics Activity International Global Power Threshold Data Base of validated ITER-like discharges. The derived model structure of the scaling for the global database is not in a power law form and includes a term that indicates saturation of PThresh with the strength of the toroidal field, plasma density and elongation. Furthermore, the single machine analysis of the database for the most representative machines of the international fusion scientific program demonstrates that the model structures are similar but the model parameters are different. The better extrapolation capability of the identified model structures with the proposed methodology is verified with a specific analysis of JET data at two different current regimes. The PThresh values extrapolated to ITER using the derived empirical model structures are a factor of two lower than those of traditional scaling laws and are predicted with a significantly better confidence.

[1]  J. Hanc,et al.  Symmetries and conservation laws: Consequences of Noether’s theorem , 2004 .

[2]  John R. Koza,et al.  Genetic programming - on the programming of computers by means of natural selection , 1993, Complex adaptive systems.

[3]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Distilling Free-Form Natural Laws from Experimental Data , 2009, Science.

[4]  D. McDonald,et al.  A new model of the L–H transition in tokamaks , 2012 .

[5]  Clement Kleinstreuer,et al.  Engineering fluid dynamics , 1997 .

[6]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[7]  M. E. J. Newman,et al.  Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law , 2005 .

[8]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model Selection and Multimodel Inference , 2003 .

[9]  David W. Scott,et al.  Multivariate Density Estimation: Theory, Practice, and Visualization , 1992, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[10]  H. R. Wilson,et al.  REVIEW ARTICLE: A review of theories of the L-H transition , 2000 .

[11]  A. Savitzky,et al.  Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures. , 1964 .

[12]  Michela Gelfusa,et al.  A statistical methodology to derive the scaling law for the H-mode power threshold using a large multi-machine database , 2012 .

[13]  Mark Kotanchek,et al.  Trustable symbolic regression models: using ensembles, interval arithmetic and pareto fronts to develop robust and trust-aware models , 2008 .

[14]  H. H. Madden Comments on the Savitzky-Golay convolution method for least-squares-fit smoothing and differentiation of digital data , 1976 .

[15]  F. Wagner,et al.  Regime of Improved Confinement and High Beta in Neutral-Beam-Heated Divertor Discharges of the ASDEX Tokamak , 1982 .

[16]  Tomonori Takizuka,et al.  Power requirement for accessing the H-mode in ITER , 2008 .