Ambient Assistive Technology Considered Harmful

Ambient assistive technology (AAT) is envisioned as a powerful tool for facing the growing demands the demographic change toward an aging society puts on care. While AAT is often expected to increase the quality of life of older people, this paper holds that relevant interventions often embody values that can contradict such visions, and in some cases even be harmful to care receivers. We argue that the strong focus AAT puts on illness and risk management reflects a medical model of care, which often disregards the psychosocial challenges that impairments and disabilities associated with old age can rise. We suggest that design of AAT could benefit from using the social model of care as design inspiration and value foundation. Such an approach puts focus on the person rather than the illness. The paper ends by providing a short description of work in which the social model of care is adopted as a basis for design of AAT.

[1]  J. Ellul The Technological Bluff , 1990 .

[2]  Alan Borning,et al.  Next steps for value sensitive design , 2012, CHI.

[3]  Jeanne M. Donaldson,et al.  Loneliness in elderly people: an important area for nursing research. , 1996, Journal of advanced nursing.

[4]  Solveig Hauge,et al.  Older Norwegians' understanding of loneliness , 2010, International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being.

[5]  L. Flicker Dementia Reconsidered: the Person Comes First , 1999, BMJ.

[6]  Neil Postman,et al.  Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology , 1993 .

[7]  Howard Falk,et al.  The Technological Society , 1965 .

[8]  Organización Mundial de la Salud Global Health and Aging , 2011 .

[9]  Bjørn Magnus Mathisen,et al.  Social Network for Elderly , 2012, IICS.

[10]  T. Epp Person-centred Dementia Care: A Vision to be Refined , 2003 .

[11]  Kristine Holbø,et al.  Value biases of sensor-based assistive technology: case study of a GPS tracking system used in dementia care , 2012, DIS '12.

[12]  Clive Baldwin Technology, Dementia and Ethics: Rethinking the Issues , 2005 .

[13]  K. Pitkälä,et al.  Loneliness among older people , 2003 .

[14]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  Reimagining HCI: toward a more human-centered perspective , 2011, INTR.

[15]  Alan Borning,et al.  Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems , 2020, The Ethics of Information Technologies.

[16]  Phillip Vaughan,et al.  Involving older people with dementia and their carers in designing computer based support systems: some methodological considerations , 2009, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[17]  Andrew M. Pope,et al.  Models of Disability and Rehabilitation , 1997 .

[18]  A. Mowshowitz The conquest of will: Information processing in human affairs , 1976 .

[19]  Rainer Muenz,et al.  Aging and demographic change in European societies : main trends and alternative policy options , 2007 .

[20]  Arlene Astell,et al.  Technology and personhood in dementia care , 2006 .

[21]  Bjørn Magnus Mathisen,et al.  Co-Living Social Community for Elderly , 2012, IICS.

[22]  Walter F. Tichy,et al.  Proceedings 25th International Conference on Software Engineering , 2003, 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings..

[23]  Arthur I. Karshmer,et al.  Living assistance systems: an ambient intelligence approach , 2006, ICSE.

[24]  K. Himma The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics , 2007 .

[25]  A. Monat Stress and Coping , 1991 .

[26]  Sunny Consolvo,et al.  A Value Sensitive Design Investigation of Privacy for Location-Enhanced Computing , 2005 .

[27]  Alan Borning,et al.  Value Sensitive Design: Theory and Methods , 2002 .

[28]  A. Antonovsky Health, stress, and coping , 1979 .