FlexRay in aerospace and safety-sensitive systems

The FlexRay field bus has potential for integrating existing networks and as a shared local sub-system network in the next generation of airplanes - leveraging a low-cost, dependable bus designed for the automotive domain. Herein, we present an overview of FlexRay and investigate FlexRay's dependability for use as a field bus in the aerospace domain. FlexRay supports all major requirements for integrating systems on a single network, if controllers are deployed with a guardian to achieve good hardware fault coverage. Despite including a guardian, some vulnerability may remain, such as software-induced failures and physical layer properties.

[1]  Hermann Kopetz,et al.  The Startup Problem in Fault-Tolerant Time-Triggered Communication , 2006, International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'06).

[2]  Michael Paulitsch,et al.  FlexRay BRAIN Fusion A FlexRay-Based Braided Ring Availability Integrity Network , 2007 .

[3]  Michael Paulitsch,et al.  Starting and Resolving a Partitioned BRAIN , 2008, 2008 11th IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC).

[4]  Philip Koopman,et al.  Coverage and the use of cyclic redundancy codes in ultra-dependable systems , 2005, 2005 International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'05).

[5]  Kristina Lundqvist,et al.  Real-time architecture analysis: a COTS perspective , 2002, Proceedings. The 21st Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[6]  Y. C. Yeh,et al.  Safety critical avionics for the 777 primary flight controls system , 2001, 20th DASC. 20th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (Cat. No.01CH37219).

[7]  Michael Paulitsch,et al.  Ringing out fault tolerance. A new ring network for superior low-cost dependability , 2005, 2005 International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'05).

[8]  Carl E. Landwehr,et al.  Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing.

[9]  Jan Torin,et al.  Protocol membership in dependable distributed communication systems: A question of brittleness , 2003 .

[10]  Wilfried Elmenreich,et al.  Benefits and Implications of the DECOS Encapsulation Approach , 2005 .

[11]  Nancy A. Lynch,et al.  A New Fault-Tolerance Algorithm for Clock Synchronization , 1988, Inf. Comput..

[12]  Hermann Kopetz,et al.  Fault containment and error detection in the time-triggered architecture , 2003, The Sixth International Symposium on Autonomous Decentralized Systems, 2003. ISADS 2003..

[13]  Yeqiong Song,et al.  Trends in Automotive Communication Systems , 2005, Proc. IEEE.

[14]  Philip Koopman,et al.  Design time reliability analysis of distributed fault tolerance algorithms , 2005, 2005 International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'05).