Comparison of 532 nm Potassium Titanyl Phosphate Laser and 595 nm Pulsed Dye Laser in the Treatment of Erythematous Surgical Scars: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Study

BACKGROUND The pulsed dye laser (PDL) has long been used for treatment of erythematous and hypertrophic scars. Its effectiveness has been attributed in large part to its vascular-specificity. The vascular-specific potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser has also been reported to be clinically effective for scars, but has not been compared to the PDL. OBJECTIVE To compare the safety and clinical efficacy of a 532-nm KTP laser versus a 595-nm PDL in improving the appearance of erythematous surgical scars. METHODS Twenty patients with matched bilateral erythematous surgical scars or a single linear erythematous scar measuring longer than 5 cm were enrolled in the study. Single scars were divided into equal halves with each half randomized to receive 3 successive treatments at 6-week intervals with either a 532-nm KTP laser (Excel V; Brisbane, CA) or a 595-nm PDL (Cynergy; Cynosure Inc., Chelmsford, MA) at equivalent laser parameters. Bilateral matched scars were similarly randomized to receive three 532-nm KTP or 595-nm PDL treatments. Clinical efficacy was evaluated 12 weeks after the third (final) laser treatment by independent, blinded photographic scar assessments. Secondary evaluations included final investigator and subject treatment/satisfaction assessments, Vancouver scar scale (VSS) scores, subject scar symptoms, intraoperative pain scores, and incidence of side effects. RESULTS Clinical improvement of erythematous surgical scars was observed with both 532-nm KTP and 595-nm PDL systems. No statistically significant differences between the 2 treatment arms were noted in the independent, blinded photographic scar assessments, investigator and subject treatment/satisfaction assessments, subject scar symptoms, and intraoperative pain scores. The KTP arm produced statistically significant improvement for the vascularity component of the VSS only. Side effects were limited to mild treatment discomfort and minimal transient post-treatment erythema and purpura. No vesiculation, infection, scarring or other adverse events were experienced. Subject satisfaction surveys mirrored the observed clinical effects. CONCLUSION The-532 nm KTP laser is comparable in efficacy and safety to the 595-nm PDL laser in the treatment of erythematous surgical scars.

[1]  H. Ryu,et al.  A Comparison of the Scar Prevention Effect Between Carbon Dioxide Fractional Laser and Pulsed Dye Laser in Surgical Scars , 2014, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[2]  J. Gladsjo,et al.  Treatment of Surgical Scars Using a 595‐nm Pulsed Dye Laser Using Purpuric and Nonpurpuric Parameters: A Comparative Study , 2014, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[3]  H. Cameron,et al.  Treatment of superficial vascular lesions with the KTP 532-nm laser: experience with 647 patients , 2013, Lasers in Medical Science.

[4]  C. Profyris,et al.  Cutaneous scarring: Pathophysiology, molecular mechanisms, and scar reduction therapeutics Part II. Strategies to reduce scar formation after dermatologic procedures. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[5]  Won-Serk Kim,et al.  Prevention of Thyroidectomy Scars in Asian Adults Using a 532‐nm Potassium Titanyl Phosphate Laser , 2011, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[6]  A. Wolkerstorfer,et al.  Laser and intense pulsed light therapy for the treatment of hypertrophic scars: a systematic review , 2011, The British journal of dermatology.

[7]  K. Khatri,et al.  Laser scar revision: A review , 2011, Journal of Cosmetic & Laser Therapy.

[8]  S. Mordon,et al.  Twenty-five years of active laser prevention of scars: What have we learned? , 2010, Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy : official publication of the European Society for Laser Dermatology.

[9]  Xiao Zhibo,et al.  Molecular Mechanism of Pulsed-Dye Laser in Treatment of Keloids: An In Vitro Study , 2010, Advances in skin & wound care.

[10]  D. Ozog,et al.  Treatment of Surgical Scars with Nonablative Fractional Laser Versus Pulsed Dye Laser: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2009, Dermatologic Surgery.

[11]  W. Maclaren,et al.  A direct comparison of pulsed dye, alexandrite, KTP and Nd:YAG lasers and IPL in patients with previously treated capillary malformations , 2008, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[12]  W. Baugh,et al.  Nonablative Phototherapy for Acne Vulgaris Using the KTP 532 nm Laser , 2005, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[13]  S. Jeng,et al.  Suppressed TGF‐β1 expression is correlated with up‐regulation of matrix metalloproteinase‐13 in keloid regression after flashlamp pulsed‐dye laser treatment , 2005 .

[14]  Min-Wei Christine Lee,et al.  Combination 532-nm and 1064-nm lasers for noninvasive skin rejuvenation and toning. , 2003, Archives of dermatology.

[15]  G. Altshuler,et al.  Extended theory of selective photothermolysis , 2001, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[16]  T. Alster,et al.  Treatment of keloid sternotomy scars with 585 nm flashlamp-pumped pulsed-dye laser , 1995, The Lancet.

[17]  T. Alster Improvement of Erythematous and Hypertrophic Scars by the 585-nm Flashlamp-pumped Pulsed Dye Laser , 1994, Annals of plastic surgery.

[18]  T. Alster,et al.  Alteration of argon laser–induced scars by the pulsed dye laser , 1993, Lasers in surgery and medicine.