ERPs and task effects in the auditory processing of gender agreement andsemantics in French

We investigated task effects on violation ERP responses to Noun-Adjective gender mismatches and lexical/conceptual semantic mismatches in a combined auditory/visual paradigm in French. Participants listened to sentences while viewing pictures of objects. This paradigm was designed to investigate language processing in special populations (e.g., children) who may not be able to read or to provide stable behavioural judgment data. Our main goal was to determine how ERP responses to our target violations might differ depending on whether participants performed a judgment task (Task) versus listening for comprehension (No-Task). Characterizing the influence of the presence versus absence of judgment tasks on violation ERP responses allows us to meaningfully interpret data obtained using this paradigm without a behavioural task and relate them to judgment-based paradigms in the ERP literature. We replicated previously observed ERP patterns for semantic and gender mismatches, and found that the task especially affected the later P600 component.

[1]  G. Mulder,et al.  When syntax meets semantics. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[2]  H. Barber,et al.  Grammatical agreement processing in reading: ERP findings and future directions , 2011, Cortex.

[3]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  The Impact of Proficiency on Syntactic Second-language Processing of German and Italian: Evidence from Event-related Potentials , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  A. Friederici,et al.  Concerning the automaticity of syntactic processing. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[6]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Integrating Gender and Number Information in Spanish Word Pairs: An Erp Study , 2003, Cortex.

[7]  Phaedra Royle,et al.  Acquisition of adjectives in Quebec French as revealed by elicitation data , 2010, Journal of French Language Studies.

[8]  J. Bosch,et al.  N400 during lexical decision tasks: a current source localization study , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al.  Monitoring in Language Perception: Mild and Strong Conflicts Elicit Different ERP Patterns , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  A. Friederici,et al.  Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. , 1993, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[11]  Kara Morgan-Short,et al.  Second Language Acquisition of Gender Agreement in Explicit and Implicit Training Conditions: An Event-Related Potential Study. , 2010, Language learning.

[12]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis , 2006, Brain and Language.

[13]  Eric Lambert,et al.  NOVLEX : une base de donnes lexicales pour les lves de primaire , 2001 .

[14]  P. Hagoort,et al.  A superficial resemblance does not necessarily mean you are part of the family : Counterarguments to Coulson, King and Kutas (1998) in the P600/SPS-P300 debate , 1999 .

[15]  M. Kutas,et al.  Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open- and closed-class words , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[16]  Sonja A. Kotz,et al.  Speeding Up Syntax: On the Relative Timing and Automaticity of Local Phrase Structure and Morphosyntactic Processing as Reflected in Event-related Brain Potentials , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Karsten Steinhauer.  Electrophysiological correlates of prosody and punctuation , 2003, Brain and Language.

[18]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  A. Friederici,et al.  N400-like Semantic Incongruity Effect in 19-Month-Olds: Processing Known Words in Picture Contexts , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  A. Friederici,et al.  Lexical integration: Sequential effects of syntactic and semantic information , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[21]  Karl G. D. Bailey,et al.  Good-Enough Representations in Language Comprehension , 2002 .

[22]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The N400 as a function of the level of processing. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[23]  John F. Connolly,et al.  CHAPTER 9 – Event-Related Potentials in the Study of Language , 2008 .

[24]  E Donchin,et al.  Syntactic parsing preferences and their on-line revisions: a spatio-temporal analysis of event-related brain potentials. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[25]  P. Hagoort.  Interplay between Syntax and Semantics during Sentence Comprehension: ERP Effects of Combining Syntactic and Semantic Violations , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  Paul Portner,et al.  Syntax, concepts, and logic in the temporal dynamics of language comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials Elicited by Failure to Agree , 1995 .

[28]  José E. García-Albea,et al.  ERP Evidence for the Rapid Assignment of an (Appropriate) Antecedent to PRO , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Gender or Genders Agreement , 2004 .

[30]  M. Kutas,et al.  Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations , 1998 .

[31]  A. Friederici,et al.  Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potential effects. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  Cheryl Frenck-Mestre,et al.  Grammatical gender processing in L2: Electrophysiological evidence of the effect of L1–L2 syntactic similarity* , 2010, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[33]  A. Friederici,et al.  Syntactic Gender and Semantic Expectancy: ERPs Reveal Early Autonomy and Late Interaction , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[35]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[36]  H. Kolk,et al.  Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials , 2003, Brain and Language.

[37]  Teija Kujala,et al.  Word Semantics Is Processed Even without Attentional Effort , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  WILLIAM MARSLEN-WILSON,et al.  Linguistic Structure and Speech Shadowing at Very Short Latencies , 1973, Nature.

[39]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  Karsten Steinhauer,et al.  On the early left-anterior negativity (ELAN) in syntax studies , 2012, Brain and Language.

[41]  M. Balconi,et al.  Comprehending Semantic and Grammatical Violations in Italian. N400 and P600 Comparison with Visual and Auditory Stimuli , 2005, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[42]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[43]  Using auditory-visual ERP experiments to study normal and impaired child language development , 2013, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[44]  P. Holcomb.  Automatic and attentional processing: An event-related brain potential analysis of semantic priming , 1988, Brain and Language.

[45]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  An Event-Related Brain Potential Analysis of Visual Word Priming Effects , 2000, Brain and Language.

[46]  S. Luck.  An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique , 2005 .

[47]  P. Hagoort,et al.  The Influence of Semantic and Syntactic Context Constraints on Lexical Selection and Integration in Spoken-Word Comprehension as Revealed by ERPs , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  A. Friederici.  Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[49]  Polly O'Rourke.  The nature of syntactic gender processing in Spanish: An ERP study , 2008 .

[50]  P Hagoort,et al.  Discourse Before Gender: An Event-Related Brain Potential Study on the Interplay of Semantic and Syntactic Information During Spoken Language Understanding , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[51]  J. de Houwer,et al.  Automaticity: a theoretical and conceptual analysis. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[52]  P. Hagoort,et al.  Thematic role assignment in patients with Broca's aphasia: Sentence–picture matching electrified , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  T. Fernández,et al.  N400 and lexical decisions: automatic or controlled processing? , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[54]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech , 1993 .

[55]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[56]  M. Ullman.  Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model , 2004, Cognition.

[57]  I. Fischler,et al.  Brain potentials during sentence verification: Automatic aspects of comprehension , 1985, Biological Psychology.

[58]  Nicolas J. Bourguignon,et al.  The temporal dynamics of inflected word recognition: A masked ERP priming study of French verbs , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  Roel M. Willems,et al.  Seeing and Hearing Meaning: ERP and fMRI Evidence of Word versus Picture Integration into a Sentence Context , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[61]  A. Friederici,et al.  Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[62]  R. C. Oldfield.  THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[63]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Grammatical Gender and Number Agreement in Spanish: An ERP Comparison , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[64]  Patricia K Kuhl,et al.  An event-related brain potential study of sentence comprehension in preschoolers: semantic and morphosyntactic processing. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[65]  Boris New,et al.  Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE , 2001 .

[66]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  [Probability and strategy: an event-related potential study of processing syntactic anomalies]. , 1997, Zeitschrift fur experimentelle Psychologie : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Psychologie.

[67]  Cheryl Frenck-Mestre,et al.  Can late L2 learners acquire new grammatical features? Evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking ☆ , 2012 .

[68]  M. Schlesewsky,et al.  Think globally: Cross-linguistic variation in electrophysiological activity during sentence comprehension , 2011, Brain and Language.

[69]  A. Friederici,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Two Steps in Syntactic Analysis: Early Automatic and Late Controlled Processes , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[70]  Bernard Lété,et al.  MANULEX: A grade-level lexical database from French elementary school readers , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[71]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT MEASURES OF SENSITIVITY TO VIOLATIONS IN SECOND LANGUAGE GRAMMAR: An Event-Related Potential Investigation , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[72]  P. Hagoort.  The fractionation of spoken language understanding by measuring electrical and magnetic brain signals , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[73]  Francesco Vespignani,et al.  A deeper reanalysis of a superficial feature: An ERP study on agreement violations , 2008, Brain Research.

[74]  Salim Roukos,et al.  Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification. , 1983, Psychophysiology.