Computational thinking for teachers: Development of a localised E-learning system
暂无分享,去创建一个
Jane Labadin | Fitri Suraya Mohamad | Ling-Ling Ung | J. Labadin | F. Mohamad | Ling-Ling Ung | L. Ung
[1] Diana Pérez,et al. Can computational thinking be improved by using a methodology based on metaphors and scratch to teach computer programming to children? , 2020, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[2] Nicholas Lytle,et al. PRADA: A Practical Model for Integrating Computational Thinking in K-12 Education , 2019, SIGCSE.
[3] Karen L. Becker,et al. Factors for Successful E-Learning: Does Age Matter?. , 2017 .
[4] Michail N. Giannakos,et al. Computational thinking education: Issues and challenges , 2020, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[5] Jane Sinclair,et al. Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study , 2020, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[6] G. Susman,et al. An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .
[7] Paul Curzon,et al. Introducing teachers to computational thinking using unplugged storytelling , 2014, WiPSCE.
[8] Jane Labadin,et al. Information System Framework for Training Teachers on Computational Thinking , 2021, SAR Journal - Science and Research.
[9] Mi Jin Noh,et al. An analysis of the relationship between quality and user acceptance in smartphone apps , 2015, Information Systems and e-Business Management.
[10] Norazila Abdul Aziz,et al. Preliminary Investigation: Teachers’ Perception on Computational Thinking Concepts , 2017 .
[11] Antonio González,et al. Teachers' ICT-related self-efficacy, job resources, and positive emotions: Their structural relations with autonomous motivation and work engagement , 2019, Comput. Educ..
[12] Yassine Jamoussi,et al. Comprehensive classification of collaboration approaches in E-learning , 2017, Telematics Informatics.
[13] Rebecca A. Croxton,et al. Designing a Responsive e-Learning Infrastructure: Systemic Change in Higher Education , 2017 .
[14] Kamisah Osman,et al. The Development of CT-S Learning Module on The Linear Motion Topic to Promote Computational Thinking Thinking , 2019, Journal of Educational Sciences.
[15] Jesse C. Bockstedt,et al. Relative Privacy Valuations Under Varying Disclosure Characteristics , 2019, Inf. Syst. Res..
[16] Özlem Efiloglu Kurt. Examining an e-learning system through the lens of the information systems success model: Empirical evidence from Italy , 2019, Educ. Inf. Technol..
[17] Terry Ryan,et al. The Role of Social Presence and Moderating Role of Computer Self-Efficacy in Predicting the Continuance Usage of E-Learning Systems , 2004, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..
[18] Miguel Nussbaum,et al. Some recommendations for the reporting of quantitative studies , 2015, Comput. Educ..
[19] J. Rowley,et al. Critical success factors for eLearning in Saudi Arabian universities , 2017 .
[20] Akarat Tanak. Designing TPACK-based course for preparing student teachers to teach science with technological pedagogical content knowledge , 2018, Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences.
[21] Tracy Camp,et al. Assessing Computational Thinking in CS Unplugged Activities , 2017, SIGCSE.
[22] María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana,et al. Tracing Teacher Collaborative Learning and Innovation Adoption: a Case Study in an Inquiry Learning Platform , 2019, CSCL.
[23] Halil İbrahim Haseski,et al. Defining a New 21st Century Skill-Computational Thinking: Concepts and Trends. , 2018 .
[24] A. Harerimana,et al. E-Learning in Nursing Education in Rwanda: Benefits and Challenges. An Exploration of Participants' Perceptives , 2016 .
[25] S. Garg,et al. Effect of Computer Efficacy, Motivation and User Satisfaction on Continuance Intention of E-Training System , 2019, Innovation, Technology, and Market Ecosystems.
[26] Mary Webb,et al. A K-6 Computational Thinking Curriculum Framework: Implications for Teacher Knowledge , 2016, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..
[27] William H. DeLone,et al. IT resources, organizational capabilities, and value creation in public-sector organizations: a public-value management perspective , 2014, J. Inf. Technol..
[28] Lori L. Pollock,et al. Infusing Computational Thinking Across Disciplines: Reflections & Lessons Learned , 2019, SIGCSE.
[29] M. Sarstedt,et al. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling , 2015 .
[30] Aman Yadav,et al. Expanding computer science education in schools: understanding teacher experiences and challenges , 2016, Comput. Sci. Educ..
[31] Siraj Muhammed Pandhiani,et al. Analysis of Factors Affecting Student Evaluation of Teaching Effectiveness in Saudi Higher Education: The Case of Jubail University College , 2017 .
[32] Anila Jha. ICT Pedagogy in Higher Education: A Constructivist Approach , 2017 .
[33] Youngsik Jeong,et al. Development and Application of Programming Education Model Based on Visual Thinking Strategy for Pre-service Teachers , 2019 .
[34] Matthew J. Koehler,et al. Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Learning Activity Types , 2009 .
[35] Barbara D. Klein,et al. The Effects of Flow on Learning Outcomes in an Online Information Management Course , 2009, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..
[36] Maryam Asoodar,et al. Framework to improve e-learner satisfaction and further strengthen e-learning implementation , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[37] Shirley Gregor,et al. An Information Systems Design Theory for e-Learning , 2004, ACIS.
[38] Paul A. Kirschner,et al. Stop propagating the learning styles myth , 2017, Comput. Educ..
[39] Mohammed Amin Almaiah. Acceptance and usage of a mobile information system services in University of Jordan , 2018, Education and Information Technologies.
[40] Nils Urbach,et al. Structural Equation Modeling in Information Systems Research Using Partial Least Squares , 2010 .
[41] Stacie L. Mason,et al. Measuring the effect of continuous professional development on elementary teachers' self-efficacy to teach coding and computational thinking , 2021, Comput. Educ..
[42] Mohamed Talea,et al. Toward an Adaptive Architecture for Integrating Mobile Apps with LMS using Next Generation of SCORM , 2019, 2019 2nd International Conference on Computer Applications & Information Security (ICCAIS).
[43] Ting-Chia Hsu,et al. How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature , 2018, Comput. Educ..
[44] Petra Fisser,et al. Computational Thinking as an Emerging Competence Domain , 2017 .
[45] Jianfeng Wang,et al. The impact of organisational support, technical support, and self-efficacy on faculty perceived benefits of using learning management system , 2018, Behav. Inf. Technol..
[46] Tahir Islam,et al. Predicting the acceptance of MOOCs in a developing country: Application of task-technology fit model, social motivation, and self-determination theory , 2017, Telematics Informatics.
[47] Maya Israel,et al. Supporting all learners in school-wide computational thinking: A cross-case qualitative analysis , 2015, Comput. Educ..
[48] Layla Hasan. Usability Problems on Desktop and Mobile Interfaces of the Moodle Learning Management System (LMS) , 2018, ICEBA 2018.
[49] W. So,et al. Multimedia e-Learning and Self-Regulated Science Learning: a Study of Primary School Learners’ Experiences and Perceptions , 2019, Journal of Science Education and Technology.
[50] F. Marimon,et al. Assessing learner satisfaction by simultaneously measuring learner attitude, motivation, loyalty and service quality in English academies , 2017 .
[51] Wynne W. Chin. The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .
[52] Bumsoo Kim,et al. Effect of personal factors to use ICTs on e-learning adoption: comparison between learner and instructor in developing countries , 2018, Inf. Technol. Dev..
[53] Charoula Angeli,et al. Developing young children's computational thinking with educational robotics: An interaction effect between gender and scaffolding strategy , 2020, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[54] Knud Illeris,et al. The Development of a Comprehensive and Coherent Theory of Learning. , 2015 .
[55] Mohamed Erradi,et al. Using cloud computing services in e-learning process: Benefits and challenges , 2017, Education and Information Technologies.
[56] Anne-Mette Nortvig,et al. A literature review of the factors influencing e-learning and blended learning in relation to learning outcome, student satisfaction and engagement , 2018 .
[57] Marian Pasquale,et al. Integrating Computational Thinking into Elementary Science Curriculum: an Examination of Activities that Support Students’ Computational Thinking in the Service of Disciplinary Learning , 2019, Journal of Science Education and Technology.
[58] Chun-Yen Tsai,et al. Improving students' understanding of basic programming concepts through visual programming language: The role of self-efficacy , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[59] Matt Bower,et al. Improving the Computational Thinking Pedagogical Capabilities of School Teachers , 2017 .
[60] M. Wihlborg,et al. Facilitating learning through an international virtual collaborative practice: A case study. , 2018, Nurse education today.
[61] Francisco Javier Rondan-Cataluña,et al. Moderating effect of learning styles on a learning management system's success , 2017, Telematics Informatics.
[62] A. Alzahrani,et al. E-learning continuance satisfaction in higher education: a unified perspective from instructors and students , 2018 .
[63] Aman Yadav,et al. Computational Thinking in Elementary and Secondary Teacher Education , 2014, ACM Trans. Comput. Educ..
[64] Michael Bieber,et al. Engaging Students with Constructivist Participatory Examinations in Asynchronous Learning Networks , 2008, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..
[65] Jalal Nouri,et al. Development of computational thinking, digital competence and 21st century skills when learning programming in K-9 , 2019, Education Inquiry.
[66] Juan Manuel Dodero,et al. Bringing computational thinking to teachers' training: a workshop review , 2017, TEEM.
[67] Bojan Lalic,et al. Developing a model to assess the success of e-learning systems: evidence from a manufacturing company in transitional economy , 2016, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..
[68] Alain Yee-Loong Chong,et al. An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research , 2017, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..
[69] L. Cronbach. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .
[70] Tiago Oliveira,et al. E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study , 2018, Comput. Educ..
[71] Shirley Gregor,et al. An Information Systems Design Theory for Web-Based Education , 2003 .
[72] E. Lehtomäki,et al. Scaffolding teachers to foster inclusive pedagogy and presence through collaborative action research , 2017 .
[73] M. Ranieri,et al. Building cases for faculty development in e-learning: a design-based approach , 2018 .
[74] Arnold Pears,et al. Holistic STEAM Education Through Computational Thinking: A Perspective on Training Future Teachers , 2019, ISSEP.
[75] Khe Foon Hew,et al. Designing Unplugged and Plugged Activities to Cultivate Computational Thinking: An Exploratory Study in Early Childhood Education , 2020, The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher.
[76] I. Ullah,et al. Encouraging knowledge sharing behavior through team innovation climate, altruistic intention and organizational culture , 2016 .
[77] Yi-Shun Wang. Assessing e‐commerce systems success: a respecification and validation of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..
[78] Muhammad Munwar Iqbal,et al. Multimedia based IoT-centric smart framework for eLearning paradigm , 2018, Multimedia Tools and Applications.
[79] Kamini Jaipal-Jamani,et al. A Case Study of a TPACK-Based Approach to Teacher Professional Development: Teaching Science With Blogs , 2015 .
[80] Thurasamy Ramayah,et al. The role of transformational leadership as a mediating variable in DeLone and McLean information system success model: The context of online learning usage in Yemen , 2018, Telematics Informatics.
[81] Aman Yadav,et al. Computational Thinking in K-12: In-service Teacher Perceptions of Computational Thinking , 2018 .
[82] Adhi Setyo Santoso,et al. User Satisfaction and Intention to Use Peer-to-Peer Online Transportation: A Replication Study , 2017 .
[83] Ming Lu,et al. eLearning technology and the advancement of practical constructivist pedagogies: Illustrations from classroom observations , 2020, Education and Information Technologies.
[85] Aman Yadav,et al. Computational thinking for teacher education , 2017, Commun. ACM.
[86] Mohammad Khasawneh,et al. Critical success factors for e-learning satisfaction, Jordanian Universities’ experience , 2017 .
[87] Aman Yadav,et al. Computational thinking in elementary classrooms: measuring teacher understanding of computational ideas for teaching science , 2018, Comput. Sci. Educ..