Spectrofluorimetric determination of formaldehyde in air after collection onto silica cartridges coated with Fluoral P

Abstract In the present work, a sensitive and selective fluorimetric method for formaldehyde determination in air samples is described. The method is based in the reaction between formaldehyde and Fluoral P producing 3,5-diacetyl-1,4-dihydrolutidine, which, when excited at 410 nm, emits fluorescence at 510 nm. The Fluoral P was prepared by the reaction of 0.3 ml of acetic acid, 0.2 ml of acetylacetone and 15.4 g of ammonium acetate. Then, the volume was completed to 100 ml with deionized water. The Fluoral P obtained, if stored under refrigeration in the dark, can be used, safely, for 60 days. The calibration curve obtained with concentrations of formaldehyde in the range of 12 to 192 ng ml−1 (n=9) was Intensity=1.11C+0.06 (R2=0.9920). In the quantification of formaldehyde, air samples were passed at 1 l min−1, during 120 min, through glass impingers containing 40 ml of Fluoral P, followed by direct fluorescence measuring, or through two SEP PAK silica cartridges, coated with Fluoral P. The cartridges were eluted with 10 ml of Fluoral P solution and quantified by spectrofluorimetry. Under these conditions, the detection limit (S/N=3) obtained was 2.0 ng ml−1. The new methodology was validated by comparison with a well-known HPLC method in which formaldehyde was collected into SEP PAK C18 cartridges coated with 2,4 dinitrophenylhydrazine. The application of the t95% test did not show significant differences between the HPLC and either fluorimetric methodologies. This method has been used in the determination of gas phase formaldehyde in both indoor and outdoor sites. For the indoor site, the measured concentrations were in the range of 9.0 to 67.7 μl l−1, while for the outdoor site they were in the range of 16.8 to 38.8 μl l−1. Further, due to the ease of handling in field studies, the SEP PAK cartridges coated with Fluoral P were used. The formaldehyde concentrations thus determined, in outdoor sites, were in the range of 2.09 to 25.1 μl l−1. The main advantage of this analytical procedure is its selectivity for formaldehyde, without interferences from bisulfite and other aldehydes, especially acetaldehyde, and low blank level, resulting in low detection limits. In addition, very little sample preparation is required.

[1]  J. Andrade,et al.  Determination of methanol and ethanol by gas chromatrography following air sampling onto florisil cartridges and their concentrations at urban sites in the three largest cities in Brazil. , 1999 .

[2]  T. Matthews Evaluation of a modified CEA Instruments, Inc. model 555 analyzer for the monitoring of formaldehyde vapor in domestic environments , 1982 .

[3]  J. Andrade,et al.  The Formaldehyde and Acetaldehyde Content of Atmospheric Aerosol , 1995 .

[4]  J. Andrade,et al.  Determination of carbonyl compounds in exhaust gases from alcohol-fuelled vehicles equipped with three-way catalytic converters , 1985 .

[5]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  On the formaldehyde-bisulfite-hydroxymethanesulfonate equilibrium , 1986 .

[6]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Determination of atmospheric sulfur dioxide without tetrachloromercurate(II) and the mechanism of the Schiff reaction , 1980 .

[7]  E. Sawicki,et al.  Spectrophotofluorimetric determination of aldehydes with dimedone and other reagents , 1968, Mikrochimica acta.

[8]  B. Goldschmidt Role of aldehydes in carcinogenesis , 1984 .

[9]  H. Tsuchiya,et al.  Determination of formaldehyde in reagents and beverages using flow injection , 1994 .

[10]  P. Carlier,et al.  The chemistry of carbonyl compounds in the atmosphere—A review , 1986 .

[11]  Roger L. Tanner,et al.  Seasonal variations in ambient atmospheric levels of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde , 1984 .

[12]  H. Singh,et al.  Measurements of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in the urban ambient air , 1986 .

[13]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Fast fluorometric flow injection analysis of formaldehyde in atmospheric water. , 1987, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Remo Guidieri Res , 1995, RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics.

[15]  W. C. Purdy,et al.  Fluoral-P, a member of a selective family of reagents for aldehydes , 1980 .

[16]  E. Grosjean,et al.  Carbonyl Products of the Gas-Phase Reaction of Ozone with Simple Alkenes , 1996 .

[17]  D. Grosjean Formaldehyde and other carbonyls in Los Angeles ambient air. , 1982, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Roger L. Tanner,et al.  Determination of formaldehyde by HPLC as the DNPH derivative following high-volume air sampling onto bisulfite-coated cellulose filters , 1992 .

[19]  J. Andrade,et al.  Catalyst and Noncatalyst Exhaust Aldehydes Emissions from Brazilian Ethanol-Fueled Vehicles , 1990 .

[20]  E. Sawicki,et al.  Spectrophotometric Determination of Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde-Releasing Compounds with Chromotropic Acid, 6-Amino-1-naphthol-3-sulfonic Acid (J Acid), and 6-Anilino-1-napthol-3-sulfonic Acid (Phenyl J Acid). , 1962 .

[21]  S. Belman,et al.  The fluorimetric determination of formaldehyde , 1963 .

[22]  K. Revzan,et al.  Modified pararosaniline method for the determination of formaldehyde in air , 1981 .

[23]  G. Streit,et al.  Atmospheric chemistry of aldehydes: enhanced peroxyacetyl nitrate formation from ethanol-fueled vehicular emissions. , 1988, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  null null,et al.  Concise International Chemical Assessment Document , 2003 .

[25]  M. Hoffmann,et al.  Aldehyde-bisulfite adducts: prediction of some of their thermodynamic and kinetic properties. , 1988, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  M. Hoffmann,et al.  On the kinetics of formaldehyde-S(IV) adduct formation in slightly acidic solution , 1986 .

[27]  J. Andrade,et al.  Atmospheric levels of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde and their relationship with the vehicular fleet composition in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil , 1998 .

[28]  D. Grosjean,et al.  Urban air pollution in Brazil: acetaldehyde and other carbonyls , 1990 .

[29]  A. Lazrus,et al.  Kinetics of the formation and decomposition of hydroxymethanesulfonate , 1986 .