Cast-in-Place Concrete Connections for Precast Deck Systems

This report contains recommended design specifications, construction specifications, and five illustrative examples of durable cast-in-place (CIP) reinforced concrete connections for precast deck systems that emulate monolithic construction, considering issues including speed of construction, durability, and fatigue. Included in the report is the supporting research that led to these recommendations. This research focused on systems that reduce the need to place and remove formwork thus accelerating on-site construction and improving safety. The three systems considered to accomplish these objectives were: (1) a precast composite slab span system (PCSSS) for short to moderate span structures, (2) full-depth prefabricated concrete decks, and (3) deck joint closure details (e.g., decked-bulb-tee (DBT) flange connections) for precast prestressed concrete girder systems for long span structures. Depending on the system, the connections are either transverse (i.e., across the width of the bridge) or longitudinal (i.e., along the length of the bridge). The first system, PCSSS, is an entire bridge system; whereas the other two systems investigated in the project represented transverse and longitudinal joint details to transfer moment and shear in precast deck panels and flanges of decked bulb tees. Two types of connection concepts were explored with these details, looped bar details and two layers of headed bar details.

[1]  Carin L. Roberts-Wollmann,et al.  Behavior of horizontal shear connections for full-depth precast concrete Bridge decks on prestressed I-girders , 2005 .

[2]  Aen Osborn,et al.  CONNECTIONS FOR MODULAR PRECAST CONCRETE BRIDGE DECKS , 1983 .

[3]  Zhongguo John Ma,et al.  Improved Longitudinal Joint Details in Decked Bulb Tees for Accelerated Bridge Construction: Concept Development , 2010 .

[4]  A H Mattock,et al.  Load distribution and connection design for precast stemmed multibeam bridge superstructures , 1986 .

[5]  Zhongguo John Ma,et al.  Improved Longitudinal Joint Details in Decked Bulb Tees for Accelerated Bridge Construction: Fatigue Evaluation , 2010 .

[6]  Catherine E French,et al.  Application of Precast Decks and Other Elements to Bridge Structures , 2006 .

[7]  Mrinmay Biswas.  Precast Bridge Deck Design Systems , 1986 .

[8]  Mahmoud A. Issa,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF TRANSVERSE JOINT GROUT MATERIALS IN FULL-DEPTH PRECAST CONCRETE BRIDGE DECK SYSTEMS , 2003 .

[9]  Robert J. Gulyas,et al.  USE OF COMPOSITE TESTING FOR EVALUATION OF KEYWAY GROUT FOR PRECAST PRESTRESSED BRIDGE BEAMS , 1997 .

[10]  Henry G. Russell,et al.  Revising High-Performance Concrete Classifications , 2006 .

[11]  Carol K. Shield,et al.  Monitoring and Analysis of Mn/DOT Precast Composite Slab Span System (PCSSS) , 2008 .

[12]  Robert J. Gulyas,et al.  Evaluation of keyway grout test methods for precast concrete bridges , 1995 .

[13]  J. Leroy Hulsey,et al.  Field Test and 3D FE Modeling of Decked Bulb-Tee Bridges , 2007 .

[14]  Michael E. Kreger,et al.  Development of a Precast Bent Cap System , 2001 .