How Farm Animals React and Perceive Stressful Situations Such As Handling, Restraint, and Transport

Simple Summary A common animal welfare question is: how stressful is handling and restraining farm animals for veterinary procedures even when no surgical or invasive procedures are done? It depends on how a particular animal perceives it. For one animal, restraint for an injection may be a positive experience associated with food treats and a different animal may be highly fearful and actively resist being restrained. The animal’s response is highly dependent on both its previous experiences and inherited traits such as temperament. Abstract An animal that has been carefully acclimated to handling may willingly re-enter a restrainer. Another animal may have an intense agitated behavioral reaction or refuse to re-enter the handling facility. Physiological measures of stress such as cortisol may be very low in the animal that re-enters willingly and higher in animals that actively resist restraint. Carefully acclimating young animals to handling and restraint can help improve both productivity and welfare by reducing fear stress. Some of the topics covered in this review are: How an animal perceives handling and restraint, the detrimental effects of a sudden novel event, descriptions of temperament and aversion tests and the importance of good stockmanship.

[1]  Fraser Af Spontaneously Occurring Forms of "Tonic Immobility" in Farm Animals. , 1960 .

[2]  G. Henriksen Status Epilepticus Partialis with Fear as Clinical Expression Report of a Case and Ictal EEG Findings , 1973, Epilepsia.

[3]  E S Redgate,et al.  A comparison of the pituitary adrenal activity elicited by electrical stimulation of preoptic, amygdaloid and hypothalamic sites in the rat brain. , 1973, Neuroendocrinology.

[4]  D. Stephens,et al.  Husbandry influences on some physiological parameters of emotional responses in calves , 1975 .

[5]  G. Torres-Hernández,et al.  An attempt to assess traits of emotionality in crossbred ewes , 1979 .

[6]  Temple Grandin,et al.  Livestock Behavior as Related to Handling Facilities Design , 1980 .

[7]  Effect of differential rearing on the behavioral and adrenocortical response of lambs to a novel environment , 1982 .

[8]  R. Dantzer,et al.  Stress in farm animals: a need for reevaluation. , 1983, Journal of animal science.

[9]  D. Blanchard,et al.  Taming in wild rats following medial amygdaloid lesions , 1984, Physiology & Behavior.

[10]  G. Hutson THE INFLUENCE OF BARLEY FOOD REWARDS ON SHEEP MOVEMENT THROUGH A HANDLING SYSTEM , 1985 .

[11]  T. Grandin,et al.  Electro-immobilization versus mechanical restraint in an avoid-avoid choice test for ewes. , 1986, Journal of animal science.

[12]  P. Pascoe Humaneness of an electroimmobilization unit for cattle. , 1986, American journal of veterinary research.

[13]  J. Rushen Aversion of sheep for handling treatments: Paired-choice studies , 1986 .

[14]  T. Grandin Voluntary acceptance of restraint by sheep , 1989 .

[15]  CS Dunn Stress reactions of cattle undergoing ritual slaughter using two methods of restraint , 1990, Veterinary Record.

[16]  J. Mateo,et al.  Effects of differential handling on the behaviour of domestic ewes () , 1991 .

[17]  A. Lawrence,et al.  Individual differences in behavioural responses of pigs exposed to non-social and social challenges , 1991 .

[18]  P. Hemsworth,et al.  The effects of aversively handling pigs, either individually or in groups, on their behaviour, growth and corticosteroids , 1991 .

[19]  M. T. Zavy,et al.  Effect of initial restraint, weaning, and transport stress on baseline and ACTH-stimulated cortisol responses in beef calves of different genotypes. , 1992, American journal of veterinary research.

[20]  Michael Davis,et al.  The role of the amygdala in fear and anxiety. , 1992, Annual review of neuroscience.

[21]  D. Lay,et al.  A comparative physiological and behavioral study of freeze and hot-iron branding using dairy cows. , 1992, Journal of animal science.

[22]  T. Grandin Behavioral agitation during handling of cattle is persistent over time , 1993 .

[23]  J. Unruh,et al.  Influence of repeated restraint and isolation stress and electrolyte administration on pituitary-adrenal secretions, electrolytes, and other blood constituents of sheep. , 1993, Journal of animal science.

[24]  T. Grandin The reluctance of cattle to change a learned choice may confound preference tests , 1994 .

[25]  S. Brown,et al.  Relationships between subjective and objective assessments of stress at slaughter and meat quality in pigs. , 1994, Meat science.

[26]  CM Foggin,et al.  Plasma cortisol as an indicator of stress due to capture and translocation in wildlife species , 1995, Veterinary Record.

[27]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Emotion: Systems, Cells, Synaptic Plasticity , 1996, Cell.

[28]  J. D. Tatum,et al.  Feedlot cattle with calm temperaments have higher average daily gains than cattle with excitable temperaments. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[29]  J. Lobato,et al.  Effect of gentle handling on the reactivity of zebu crossed calves to humans , 1997 .

[30]  Short communication The effect of experience of handling on pigs' willingness to move , 1997 .

[31]  R. Dillon,et al.  Relationships between temperament and growth in a feedlot and commercial carcass traits of Bos indicus crossbreds , 1997 .

[32]  T Grandin,et al.  Assessment of stress during handling and transport. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[33]  V. Wiegant,et al.  Effects of regular moving and handling on the behavioral and physiological responses of pigs to preslaughter treatment and consequences for subsequent meat quality. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[34]  H. Tanida,et al.  The ability of miniature pigs to discriminate between a stranger and their familiar handler , 1998 .

[35]  P. N. Grigor,et al.  The relative aversiveness to farmed red deer of transport, physical restraint, human proximity and social isolation , 1998 .

[36]  D. Broom,et al.  Effect of transportation on plasma cortisol and packed cell volume in different genotypes of sheep , 1998 .

[37]  Crate conditioning of bongo (Tragelaphus eurycerus) for veterinary and husbandry procedures at the Denver Zoological Gardens , 1998 .

[38]  J. Blackshaw Human‐Livestock Interactions , 1998 .

[39]  T. Grandin The feasibility of using vocalization scoring as an indicator of poor welfare during cattle slaughter , 1998 .

[40]  J. Panksepp Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions , 1998 .

[41]  J Rushen,et al.  Fear of people by cows and effects on milk yield, behavior, and heart rate at milking. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.

[42]  Joseph E LeDoux Emotion circuits in the brain. , 2009, Annual review of neuroscience.

[43]  P. Hemsworth,et al.  Behavioural response to humans and the productivity of commercial dairy cows. , 2000, Applied animal behaviour science.

[44]  A. Boissy,et al.  Do beef cattle react consistently to different handling situations? , 2001, Applied animal behaviour science.

[45]  H. Tanida,et al.  How do miniature pigs discriminate between people?. Discrimination between people wearing coveralls of the same colour. , 2001, Applied animal behaviour science.

[46]  S. Gosling From mice to men: what can we learn about personality from animal research? , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  T. Grandin Cattle vocalizations are associated with handling and equipment problems at beef slaughter plants. , 2001, Applied animal behaviour science.

[48]  S. Waiblinger,et al.  The relationship between attitudes, personal characteristics and behaviour of stockpeople and subsequent behaviour and production of dairy cows , 2002 .

[49]  V. J. Doogan,et al.  Productivity, carcass and meat quality of lot-fed Bos indicus cross steers grouped according to temperament , 2002 .

[50]  J. Rushen,et al.  Recognition of people by dairy calves using colour of clothing , 2003 .

[51]  Jeffrey Rushen,et al.  Dairy cattle’s choice of handling treatments in a Y-maze , 2003 .

[52]  S. Waiblinger,et al.  Previous handling and gentle interactions affect behaviour and heart rate of dairy cows during a veterinary procedure , 2004 .

[53]  Alain Boissy,et al.  Genetic analysis of emotional reactivity in sheep: effects of the genotypes of the lambs and of their dams , 2005, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[54]  C. Dwyer How has the risk of predation shaped the behavioural responses of sheep to fear and distress? , 2004, Animal Welfare.

[55]  D. Lunstra,et al.  Ovarian follicular development in cattle selected for twin ovulations and births. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[56]  A. Boissy,et al.  Effects of repeated stress during pregnancy in ewes on the behavioural and physiological responses to stressful events and birth weight of their offspring , 2004 .

[57]  F. S. Guthery,et al.  Animals in Translation , 2005 .

[58]  Evelyn B. Hanggi The thinking horse: cognition and perception reviewed. , 2005 .

[59]  J. D. Tatum,et al.  Effects of ractopamine supplementation on behavior of British, Continental, and Brahman crossbred steers during routine handling. , 2006, Journal of animal science.

[60]  D. S. Hale,et al.  Influence of animal temperament and stress responsiveness on the carcass quality and beef tenderness of feedlot cattle. , 2006, Meat science.

[61]  N. Dingemanse,et al.  Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution , 2007, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[62]  I. Clarke,et al.  Isolation and restraint stress results in differential activation of corticotrophin-releasing hormone and arginine vasopressin neurons in sheep , 2007, Neuroscience.

[63]  K. Schwartzkopf-Genswein,et al.  Effect of neck injection and handler visibility on behavioral reactivity of beef steers. , 2008, Journal of animal science.

[64]  S. McBride,et al.  Estimates of the genetic parameters and repeatability of behavioural traits of sheep in an arena test , 2008 .

[65]  A. Boissy,et al.  Can emotional reactivity predict stress responses at slaughter in sheep , 2009 .

[66]  Temple Grandin,et al.  How to improve livestock handling and reduce stress. , 2021, Improving animal welfare: a practical approach.

[67]  V. J. Doogan,et al.  Quality of handling and holding yard environment, and beef cattle temperament: 2. Consequences for stress and productivity , 2009 .

[68]  J. Yelich,et al.  Effects of acclimation to handling on performance, reproductive, and physiological responses of Brahman-crossbred heifers. , 2009, Journal of animal science.

[69]  Temple Grandin,et al.  Improving animal welfare: a practical approach , 2009 .

[70]  Jeffrey Rushen,et al.  The importance of good stockmanship and its benefits for the animals. , 2009 .

[71]  M. Gauly,et al.  Temperament traits of beef calves measured under field conditions and their relationships to performance. , 2010, Journal of animal science.

[72]  F. Wemelsfelder,et al.  Qualitative Behavioural Assessment and Quantitative Physiological Measurement of Cattle Naïve and Habituated to Road Transport , 2011 .

[73]  D. L. Robinson,et al.  Cattle temperament: persistence of assessments and associations with productivity, efficiency, carcass and meat quality traits. , 2011, Journal of animal science.

[74]  A. Boissy,et al.  Separation distress in artificially-reared lambs depends on human presence and the number of conspecifics , 2011 .

[75]  V. Deiss,et al.  Behavioural and physiological reactions of cattle in a commercial abattoir: relationships with organisational aspects of the abattoir and animal characteristics. , 2011, Meat science.

[76]  D. S. Buchanan,et al.  Working chute behavior of feedlot cattle can be an indication of cattle temperament and beef carcass composition and quality. , 2011, Meat science.

[77]  Jaak Panksepp,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews the Basic Emotional Circuits of Mammalian Brains: Do Animals Have Affective Lives? , 2022 .

[78]  M. Fendt,et al.  Behavioural fear and heart rate responses of horses after exposure to novel objects: effects of habituation , 2011 .

[79]  X. Boivin,et al.  Development of affinity to the stockperson in lambs from two breeds , 2012, Physiology & Behavior.

[80]  M. Spedding,et al.  Multiple exposures to familiar conspecific withdrawal is a novel robust stress paradigm in ewes , 2012, Physiology & Behavior.

[81]  A. Valros,et al.  Farmer attitude toward improvement of animal welfare is correlated with piglet production parameters , 2012 .

[82]  F. Wemelsfelder,et al.  Qualitative Behavioural Assessment of emotionality in pigs , 2012, Applied animal behaviour science.

[83]  F. Wemelsfelder,et al.  Qualitative behavioral assessment of transport-naive and transport-habituated sheep. , 2012, Journal of animal science.

[84]  D. Bohnert,et al.  Effects of temperament and acclimation to handling on reproductive performance of Bos taurus beef females. , 2012, Journal of animal science.

[85]  P. Sandøe,et al.  The Correlation of Qualitative Behavior Assessments with Welfare Quality® Protocol Outcomes in On-Farm Welfare Assessment of Dairy Cattle , 2013 .

[86]  A. Boissy,et al.  The valence of the long-lasting emotional experiences with various handlers modulates discrimination and generalization of individual humans in sheep. , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[87]  T. Grandin,et al.  Comparison of flight speed and exit score as measurements of temperament in beef cattle. , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[88]  T. Grandin Genetics and the Behavior of Domestic Animals , 2013 .

[89]  C. Berg,et al.  Cattle behaviours and stockperson actions related to impaired animal welfare at Swedish slaughter plants , 2014 .

[90]  T. Grandin Handling facilities and restraint of extensively raised range cattle. , 2014 .

[91]  Temple Grandin,et al.  Genetics and behavior during handling, restraint, and herding. , 2014 .

[92]  L. Gygax,et al.  Are special feed and being brushed judged as positive by calves , 2014 .

[93]  L. Gallego,et al.  Habituating to handling: factors affecting preorbital gland opening in red deer calves. , 2014, Journal of animal science.

[94]  G. Coleman,et al.  Using qualitative behaviour assessment to explore the link between stockperson behaviour and dairy calf behaviour , 2014 .

[95]  A. Boissy,et al.  How assessing relationships between emotions and cognition can improve farm animal welfare. , 2014, Revue scientifique et technique.

[96]  Paolo Baragli,et al.  Effect of aging on behavioural and physiological responses to a stressful stimulus in horses (Equus caballus) , 2014 .

[97]  R. Cooke Bill E. Kunkle Interdisciplinary Beef Symposium: Temperament and acclimation to human handling influence growth, health, and reproductive responses in Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle. , 2014, Journal of animal science.

[98]  A comparison of handling methods relevant to the religious slaughter of sheep , 2014 .

[99]  C. Tallet,et al.  Persistency of the piglet's reactivity to the handler following a previous positive or negative experience , 2015 .

[100]  A. Boissy,et al.  Young Blond d’Aquitaine, Angus and Limousin bulls differ in emotional reactivity: Relationships with animal traits, stress reactions at slaughter and post-mortem muscle metabolism , 2015 .

[101]  R. H. Marin,et al.  Effect of Postweaning Handling Strategies on Welfare and Productive Traits in Lambs , 2015, Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS.

[102]  Early human handling in non-weaned piglets: Effects on behaviour and body weight , 2015 .