Alternating Fixed Points in Boolean Equation Systems as Preferred Stable Models

We formally characterize alternating fixedp oints of boolean equation systems as models of (propositional) normal logic programs. To this end, we introduce the notion of a preferred stable model of a logic program, and define a mapping that associates a normal logic program with a boolean equation system such that the solution to the equation system can be "readoff" the preferredstable model of the logic program. We also show that the preferredmo del cannot be calculateda-p osteriori (i.e. compute stable models and choose the preferredone) but rather must be computedin an intertwinedfashion with the stable model itself. The mapping reveals a natural relationship between the evaluation of alternating fixedp oints in boolean equation systems and the Gelfond-Lifschitz transformation usedin stable-model computation.For alternation-free boolean equation systems, we show that the logic programs we derive are stratified, while for formulas with alternation, the corresponding programs are non-stratified. Consequently, our mapping of boolean equation systems to logic programs preserves the computational complexity of evaluating the solutions of special classes of equation systems (e.g., linear-time for the alternation-free systems, exponential for systems with alternating fixed points).

[1]  C. R. Ramakrishnan,et al.  XMC: A Logic-Programming-Based Verification Toolset , 2000, CAV.

[2]  Joseph Sifakis,et al.  Specification and verification of concurrent systems in CESAR , 1982, Symposium on Programming.

[3]  Thomas Eiter,et al.  Preferred Answer Sets for Extended Logic Programs , 1999, Artif. Intell..

[4]  Rance Cleaveland,et al.  A linear-time model-checking algorithm for the alternation-free modal mu-calculus , 1993, Formal Methods Syst. Des..

[5]  D. Kozen Results on the Propositional µ-Calculus , 1982 .

[6]  Angelika Mader,et al.  Verification of modal properties using Boolean equation systems , 1997 .

[7]  Giorgio Delzanno,et al.  Model Checking in CLP , 1999, TACAS.

[8]  Johan Lewi,et al.  Efficient Local Correctness Checking for Single and Alternating Boolean Equation Systems , 1994, ICALP.

[9]  Vaughan R. Pratt,et al.  A decidable mu-calculus: Preliminary report , 1981, 22nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1981).

[10]  Chiaki Sakama,et al.  Representing Priorities in Logic Programs , 1996, JICSLP.

[11]  Ilkka Niemelä,et al.  Efficient Implementation of the Well-founded and Stable Model Semantics , 1996, JICSLP.

[12]  Edmund M. Clarke,et al.  Design and Synthesis of Synchronization Skeletons Using Branching-Time Temporal Logic , 1981, Logic of Programs.

[13]  C. R. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Efficient Model Checking Using Tabled Resolution , 1997, CAV.

[14]  C. R. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Fully Local and Efficient Evaluation of Alternating Fixed Points (Extended Abstract) , 1998, TACAS.

[15]  Rance Cleaveland,et al.  A linear-time model-checking algorithm for the alternation-free modal mu-calculus , 1993, Formal Methods Syst. Des..

[16]  Edmund M. Clarke,et al.  Formal Methods: State of the Art and Future Directions Working Group Members , 1996 .