The Surgical Mortality Probability Model: Derivation and Validation of a Simple Risk Prediction Rule for Noncardiac Surgery

Objective:To develop a 30-day mortality risk index for noncardiac surgery that can be used to communicate risk information to patients and guide clinical management at the “point-of-care,” and that can be used by surgeons and hospitals to internally audit their quality of care. Background:Clinicians rely on the Revised Cardiac Risk Index to quantify the risk of cardiac complications in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Because mortality from noncardiac causes accounts for many perioperative deaths, there is also a need for a simple bedside risk index to predict 30-day all-cause mortality after noncardiac surgery. Methods:Retrospective cohort study of 298,772 patients undergoing noncardiac surgery during 2005 to 2007 using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Results:The 9-point S-MPM (Surgical Mortality Probability Model) 30-day mortality risk index was derived empirically and includes three risk factors: ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status, emergency status, and surgery risk class. Patients with ASA physical status I, II, III, IV or V were assigned either 0, 2, 4, 5, or 6 points, respectively; intermediate- or high-risk procedures were assigned 1 or 2 points, respectively; and emergency procedures were assigned 1 point. Patients with risk scores less than 5 had a predicted risk of mortality less than 0.50%, whereas patients with a risk score of 5 to 6 had a risk of mortality between 1.5% and 4.0%. Patients with a risk score greater than 6 had risk of mortality more than 10%. S-MPM exhibited excellent discrimination (C statistic, 0.897) and acceptable calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic 13.0, P = 0.023) in the validation data set. Conclusions:Thirty-day mortality after noncardiac surgery can be accurately predicted using a simple and accurate risk score based on information readily available at the bedside. This risk index may play a useful role in facilitating shared decision making, developing and implementing risk-reduction strategies, and guiding quality improvement efforts.

[1]  Stuart R Lipsitz,et al.  Surgical outcome measurement for a global patient population: validation of the Surgical Apgar Score in 8 countries. , 2011, Surgery.

[2]  A. Gawande,et al.  The intraoperative Surgical Apgar Score predicts postdischarge complications after colon and rectal resection. , 2010, Surgery.

[3]  Justin B Dimick,et al.  Risk adjustment for comparing hospital quality with surgery: how many variables are needed? , 2010, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[4]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Informed consent to promote patient-centered care. , 2010, JAMA.

[5]  D. Wijeysundera,et al.  Systematic Review: Prediction of Perioperative Cardiac Complications and Mortality by the Revised Cardiac Risk Index , 2010, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[6]  L. Goldman The Revised Cardiac Risk Index Delivers What It Promised , 2010, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  A. Engel,et al.  Risk modelling of outcome after general and trauma surgery (the IRIS score) , 2009, The British journal of surgery.

[8]  C. Ko,et al.  Does Surgical Quality Improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: An Evaluation of All Participating Hospitals , 2009, Annals of surgery.

[9]  Jesse M. Ehrenfeld,et al.  Utility of the surgical apgar score: validation in 4119 patients. , 2009, Archives of surgery.

[10]  David R Flum,et al.  Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[11]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Does the Surgical Apgar Score Measure Intraoperative Performance? , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[12]  Denis Xavier,et al.  Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial , 2008, The Lancet.

[13]  Dana B. Mukamel,et al.  Impact of the Present-on-Admission Indicator on Hospital Quality Measurement: Experience With the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Inpatient Quality Indicators , 2008, Medical care.

[14]  J. Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiov , 2007, Circulation.

[15]  D. Prytherch,et al.  Comparison of different methods of risk stratification in urgent and emergency surgery , 2007, The British journal of surgery.

[16]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  Assessing the calibration of mortality benchmarks in critical care: The Hosmer-Lemeshow test revisited* , 2007, Critical care medicine.

[17]  O. Jonasson,et al.  The patient safety in surgery study: background, study design, and patient populations. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[18]  Mary R. Kwaan,et al.  An Apgar score for surgery. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[19]  Robert M Mentzer,et al.  National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Risk Factors Can Be Used to Validate American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA PS) Levels , 2006, Annals of surgery.

[20]  Michael L. Johnson,et al.  Mortality After Noncardiac Surgery: Prediction From Administrative Versus Clinical Data , 2005, Medical care.

[21]  Ralph B D'Agostino,et al.  Presentation of multivariate data for clinical use: The Framingham Study risk score functions. , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  M. Irwin,et al.  The ASA Physical Status Classification: Inter-observer Consistency , 2002, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[23]  S. Bann,et al.  The surgical risk scale as an improved tool for risk‐adjusted analysis in comparative surgical audit , 2002, The British journal of surgery.

[24]  E F Cook,et al.  Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. , 1999, Circulation.

[25]  P. C. Weaver,et al.  POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality , 1998 .

[26]  S. Lemeshow,et al.  As American as apple pie and APACHE. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation. , 1998, Critical care medicine.

[27]  P. C. Weaver,et al.  POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity. , 1998, The British journal of surgery.

[28]  K. Hammermeister,et al.  Risk adjustment of the postoperative morbidity rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[29]  L. Iezzoni Assessing Quality Using Administrative Data , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[30]  F. Grover,et al.  Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[31]  S. Ranta,et al.  A survey of the ASA physical status classification: significant variation in allocation among Finnish anaesthesiologists , 1997, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[32]  J. Smolle,et al.  Comparison of two preoperative indices to predict perioperative mortality in non-cardiac thoracic surgery. , 1997, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[33]  G. Pierer,et al.  Can ASA grade or Goldman's cardiac risk index predict peri‐operative mortality? A study of 16 227 patients , 1997, Anaesthesia.

[34]  E Magi,et al.  ASA classification and perioperative variables as predictors of postoperative outcome. , 1997, British journal of anaesthesia.

[35]  D. Sackett,et al.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't , 1996, BMJ.

[36]  P. Royston,et al.  Regression using fractional polynomials of continuous covariates: parsimonious parametric modelling. , 1994 .

[37]  S. Lemeshow,et al.  Mortality Probability Models (MPM II) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients. , 1993, JAMA.

[38]  G. P. Copeland,et al.  POSSUM: A scoring system for surgical audit , 1991, The British journal of surgery.

[39]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[40]  L. Tiret,et al.  Prediction of outcome of anaesthesia in patients over 40 years: a multifactorial risk index. , 1988, Statistics in medicine.

[41]  H. Sox,et al.  Clinical prediction rules. Applications and methodological standards. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[42]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[43]  E. Spitznagel,et al.  ASA Physical Status Classifications: A Study of Consistency of Ratings , 1978, Anesthesiology.

[44]  L Goldman,et al.  Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures. , 1977, The New England journal of medicine.

[45]  G. Marx,et al.  Computer Analysis of Postanesthetic Deaths , 1973, Anesthesiology.

[46]  C. J. Vacanti,et al.  A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship of Physical Status to Postoperative Mortality in 68,388 Cases , 1970, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[47]  W HUEGIN,et al.  [THE ROLE OF ANESTHESIA IN SURGICAL MORTALITY]. , 1965, Klinische Medizin; osterreichische Zeitschrift fur wissenschaftliche und praktische Medizin.

[48]  Meyer Saklad,et al.  GRADING OF PATIENTS FOR SURGICAL PROCEDURES , 1941 .