IS integration and knowledge sharing in multi-unit firms: the winner's curse

Knowledge sharing across business units (BUs) is paramount for enterprises that aim to exploit latent cross-BU synergies. This paper examines how information systems (ISs) integration and two forms of cross-BU knowledge complementarities (workflow interdependence and BU relatedness) affect an important dimension of a firm's absorptive capacity – cross-BU knowledge sharing. The analysis, performed on survey data from 75 enterprises, supports all of our hypotheses. First, we hypothesized that cross-BU workflow serves as a conduit for knowledge transfer as participants continually engage in spontaneous adaptations. Second, IS application integration and cross-BU relatedness should both directly contribute to knowledge sharing. Third, IS application integration should positively moderate the impacts of cross-BU relatedness. Finally, and most interestingly, we hypothesized a redistribution of the effects of IS integration by which it becomes a key contributor to knowledge sharing, but also causes a reduction in the impact of workflow interdependence. Thus, while the seamlessness of high IS application integration has obvious benefits, it paradoxically also reduces the occasions for cross-BU workflow adaptations, which is a key mechanism for knowledge transfer. That is the phenomenon we call the ‘winner's curse’.

[1]  Christoph Schlueter Langdon Designing Information Systems Capabilities to Create Business Value: A Theoretical Conceptualization of the Role of Flexibility and Integration , 2006, J. Database Manag..

[2]  Peter Weill,et al.  Strategic context and patterns of IT infrastructure capability , 1999, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Nilesh Saraf,et al.  IS Application Capabilities and Relational Value in Interfirm Partnerships , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Charles H. Kriebel,et al.  Information Technologies and Business Value: An Analytic and Empirical Investigation , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  The Net-Enabled Business Innovation Cycle and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[7]  D. Teece ECONOMIES OF SCOPE AND THE SCOPE OF THE ENTERPRISE , 1980 .

[8]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Cross-Business Information Technology Integration and Acquirer Value Creation in Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[10]  R. Rumelt Strategy, structure, and economic performance , 1974 .

[11]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .

[12]  Wynne W. Chin The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[13]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[14]  A. Tenbrunsel,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2013 .

[15]  K. Jöreskog,et al.  A General Method of Estimating the Reliability of a Composite , 1978 .

[16]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[17]  M. Evans A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis , 1985 .

[18]  John A. Pearce,et al.  Business unit relatedness and performance: A look at the pulp and paper industry , 1992 .

[19]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[20]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[21]  Vladimir Zwass,et al.  Actualizing Organizational Memory with Information Systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[23]  R. Sohi,et al.  IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link? , 2003 .

[24]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies , 2002 .

[25]  Arun Rai,et al.  Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities , 2006 .

[26]  F. Malerba,et al.  Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification , 2003 .

[27]  George Strauss,et al.  Tracking the Giant Corporation@@@Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. , 1991 .

[28]  Stanley F. Slater,et al.  Intelligence generation and superior customer value , 2000 .

[29]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Enterprise resource planning and organizational knowledge: patterns of convergence and divergence , 2000, ICIS.

[30]  Haim Mendelson,et al.  Clockspeed and Informational Response: Evidence from the Information Technology Industry , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  A. Pehrsson Business relatedness and performance : a study of managerial perceptions , 2006 .

[32]  J. Hagel,et al.  Unbundling the corporation. , 1999, Harvard business review.

[33]  J. Kagel,et al.  The Winner's Curse and Public Information in Common Value Auctions: Comment , 1999 .

[34]  Wynne W. Chin Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[35]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[36]  J. Robins,et al.  A resource‐based approach to the multibusiness firm: Empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance , 1995 .

[37]  Debra Zahay,et al.  Customer Learning Processes, Strategy Selection, and Performance in Business-to-Business Service Firms , 2004, Decis. Sci..

[38]  Suzanne D. Pawlowski,et al.  Supporting shared information systems: boundary objects, communities, and brokering , 2000, ICIS.

[39]  E. B. Andersen,et al.  Modern factor analysis , 1961 .

[40]  C. Antonelli Localized technological change and the evolution of standards as economic institutions , 1994 .

[41]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Managing Client Dialogues During Information Systems Design to Facilitate Client Learning , 2005, MIS Q..

[42]  Rashi Glazer Marketing in an Information-Intensive Environment: Strategic Implications of Knowledge as an Asset , 1991 .

[43]  Akhil Kumar,et al.  Research Commentary: Workflow Management Issues in e-Business , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[44]  Traci Carte,et al.  In Pursuit of Moderation: Nine Common Errors and Their Solutions , 2003, MIS Q..

[45]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[46]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Understanding shared knowledge creation spaces around business processes: precursors to process innovation implementation , 2001, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[47]  Sunder Kekre,et al.  Strategic and Operational Benefits of Electronic Integration in B2B Procurement Processes , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[48]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[49]  M. Goold,et al.  Desperately seeking synergy. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[50]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[51]  J. Harrison,et al.  Manufacturing-based relatedness, synergy, and coordination , 1999 .

[52]  K. Eisenhardt Coevolving : At last, a way to make synergies work , 2000 .

[53]  Nancy M. Dixon,et al.  Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know , 2000 .

[54]  James M. Sinkula Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning , 1994 .

[55]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  From IT Leveraging Competence to Competitive Advantage in Turbulent Environments: The Case of New Product Development , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[56]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[57]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[58]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Patching. Restitching business portfolios in dynamic markets. , 1999, Harvard business review.

[59]  Xin Luo,et al.  Exploring the impact of instant messaging on subjective task complexity and user satisfaction , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[60]  W. Scott,et al.  Tracking the Giant Corporation@@@Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. , 1991 .

[61]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities , 2011, Decis. Sci..

[62]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[63]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[64]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Net-Enabled Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[65]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[66]  C. Saunders,et al.  Editor's comments: PLS: a silver bullet? , 2006 .

[67]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Measuring And Assessing Organizations , 1980 .

[68]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Quality Management in Systems Development: An Organizational System Perspective , 2000, MIS Q..

[69]  Judy E. Scott Facilitating Interorganizational Learning with Information Technology , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[70]  Richard Colombo,et al.  A Model for Diagnosing and Reducing Non-response Bias , 2000, Journal of Advertising Research.

[71]  Jae-Nam Lee,et al.  The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[72]  Mani Subramani,et al.  How Do Suppliers Benefit from Information Technology Use in Supply Chain Relationships? , 2004, MIS Q..

[73]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Bridging communities of practice with information technology in pursuit of global knowledge sharing , 2003, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[74]  John J. Sviokla,et al.  Exploiting the virtual value chain , 1999 .

[75]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Interunit Communication in Multinational Corporations , 1994 .

[76]  J. Brockner,et al.  When Trust Matters: The Moderating Effect of Outcome Favorability , 1997 .

[77]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[78]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation , 1998 .

[79]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  The effect of flaming on computer-mediated negotiations , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[80]  Bryan Hattingh,et al.  The competitive advantage , 2007 .

[81]  Wenpin Tsai Social Structure of Coopetition Within a Multiunit Organization: Coordination, Competition, and Intraorganizational Knowledge Sharing , 2002 .

[82]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A critical look at partial least squares modeling , 2009 .

[83]  Andrew A. King,et al.  Prospects for Developing Absorptive Capacity Through Internal Information Provision , 2004 .

[84]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[85]  J. H. Dyer Does Governance Matter? Keiretsu Alliances and Asset Specificity as Sources of Japanese Competitive Advantage , 1996 .

[86]  Gregory E. Truman,et al.  Integration in Electronic Exchange Environments , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[87]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Improving knowledge intensive processes through an enterprise knowledge medium , 1999, SIGCPR '99.

[88]  Philip Yetton,et al.  Strategic Payoff from EDI as a Function of EDI Embeddedness , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[89]  Mcdp Mathieu Weggeman,et al.  Creating corporate advantage through purchasing: Toward a contingency model , 2003 .

[90]  Christophe Van den Bulte,et al.  The Effects of R&D Team Co-Location on Communication Patterns Among R&D, Marketing, and Manufacturing , 1998 .

[91]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Performance-Centered Design of Knowledge-Intensive Processes , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[92]  James A. Narus,et al.  Capturing the value of supplementary services , 1995 .

[93]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[94]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[95]  Stuart Hannabuss,et al.  Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know , 2001 .

[96]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Expertise Integration and Creativity in Information Systems Development , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[97]  M. Feldman Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change , 2000 .

[98]  Luciana D'Adderio,et al.  Configuring software, reconfiguring memories: the influence of integrated systems on the reproduction of knowledge and routines , 2003 .

[99]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  The 'Third Hand': IT-Enabled Competitive Advantage in Turbulence Through Improvisational Capabilities , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[100]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  Exploring knowledge diversity in knowledge intensive firms: a new role for information systems , 1996 .

[101]  Carol Saunders,et al.  PLS: A Silver Bullet? , 2006 .

[102]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  Turning a Community into a Market: A Practice Perspective on Information Technology Use in Boundary Spanning , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[103]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Absorptive Capacity Configurations in Supply Chains: Gearing for Partner-Enabled Market Knowledge Creation , 2005, MIS Q..