Reproducibility of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Diameter Measurement and Growth Evaluation on Axial and Multiplanar Computed Tomography Reformations

PurposeTo compare different methods measuring abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) maximal diameter (Dmax) and its progression on multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scan.Materials and MethodsForty AAA patients with two MDCT scans acquired at different times (baseline and follow-up) were included. Three observers measured AAA diameters by seven different methods: on axial images (anteroposterior, transverse, maximal, and short-axis views) and on multiplanar reformation (MPR) images (coronal, sagittal, and orthogonal views). Diameter measurement and progression were compared over time for the seven methods. Reproducibility of measurement methods was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman analysis.ResultsDmax, as measured on axial slices at baseline and follow-up (FU) MDCTs, was greater than that measured using the orthogonal method (p = 0.046 for baseline and 0.028 for FU), whereas Dmax measured with the orthogonal method was greater those using all other measurement methods (p-value range: <0.0001–0.03) but anteroposterior diameter (p = 0.18 baseline and 0.10 FU). The greatest interobserver ICCs were obtained for the orthogonal and transverse methods (0.972) at baseline and for the orthogonal and sagittal MPR images at FU (0.973 and 0.977). Interobserver ICC of the orthogonal method to document AAA progression was greater (ICC = 0.833) than measurements taken on axial images (ICC = 0.662–0.780) and single-plane MPR images (0.772–0.817).ConclusionAAA Dmax measured on MDCT axial slices overestimates aneurysm size. Diameter as measured by the orthogonal method is more reproducible, especially to document AAA progression.

[1]  Marcel Breeuwer,et al.  Segmentation of thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysms from CTA with nonparametric statistical grey level appearance modeling , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  W. Mali,et al.  Inter- and intraobserver variability of CT measurements obtained after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  B Littenberg,et al.  Management of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Early surgery vs watchful waiting. , 1992, JAMA.

[4]  M. Makaroun,et al.  Long-term fate of the aneurysmal sac after endoluminal exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2000, Journal of vascular surgery.

[5]  C. Zarins,et al.  Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[6]  Manish Mehta,et al.  Variability of maximal aortic aneurysm diameter measurements on CT scan: significance and methods to minimize. , 2004, Journal of vascular surgery.

[7]  G. Meier,et al.  Comparison of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter measurements obtained with ultrasound and computed tomography: Is there a difference? , 2003, Journal of vascular surgery.

[8]  W. Pearce,et al.  Reduction in aortic aneurysm size: early results after endovascular graft placement. EVT Investigators. , 1997, Journal of vascular surgery.

[9]  M. Mckusick,et al.  Computed Tomography and Ultrasound in Follow-up of Patients after Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm , 2004, Annals of vascular surgery.

[10]  S. Leeder,et al.  A population based study , 1993, The Medical journal of Australia.

[11]  K. Vincken,et al.  Intra- and Interobserver Variability of Aortic Aneurysm Volume Measurement with Fast CTA Postprocessing Software , 2008, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[12]  G. Kopchok,et al.  Computed tomography assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm morphology after endograft exclusion. , 2001, Journal of vascular surgery.

[13]  A. R. Brady,et al.  Mortality results for randomised controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms , 1998, The Lancet.

[14]  D J Ballard,et al.  Variability in measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group. , 1995, Journal of vascular surgery.

[15]  G. Rubin,et al.  Rate of change in abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter after endovascular repair. , 2000, Journal of vascular surgery.

[16]  D. Pilcher,et al.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion rate: effect of size and beta-adrenergic blockade. , 1994, Journal of vascular surgery.

[17]  Simon G. Thompson,et al.  Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Expansion: Risk Factors and Time Intervals for Surveillance , 2004, Circulation.

[18]  K. Partanen,et al.  Interobserver variability in measuring the dimensions of the abdominal aorta: comparison of ultrasound and computed tomography. , 1996, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[19]  K. Bønaa,et al.  Intra- and interobserver variability in the measurements of abdominal aortic and common iliac artery diameter with computed tomography. The Tromsø study. , 2003, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[20]  F. Lederle.  Management of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[21]  T. Walker.  Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Nonenhanced Volumetric CT for Follow-up , 2010 .

[22]  Claudio Vignali,et al.  Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Analysis of Aneurysm Volumetric Changes at Mid-Term Follow-Up , 2005, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[23]  D Bergqvist,et al.  Measuring the abdominal aorta with ultrasonography and computed tomography - difference and variability. , 2002, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[24]  B. Rubin,et al.  A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of doxycycline after endoluminal aneurysm repair. , 2008, Journal of vascular surgery.

[25]  T. Hatakeyama,et al.  Risk factors for rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm based on three-dimensional study. , 2001, Journal of vascular surgery.

[26]  Elie Mousseaux,et al.  Aneurysmal sizing after endovascular repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm: interobserver variability of various measurement protocols and its clinical relevance , 2003, European Radiology.

[27]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  Potential Value of Aneurysm Sac Volume Measurements in Addition to Diameter Measurements after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair , 2009, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[28]  C. Bartolozzi,et al.  Ultrasonographic Surveillance with Selective CTA after Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm , 2009, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[29]  Satish C. Muluk,et al.  Two-Dimensional versus Three-Dimensional CT Scan for Aortic Measurement , 2003, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[30]  J. Blankensteijn,et al.  Maximal aneurysm diameter follow-up is inadequate after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. , 2000, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[31]  M. P. Nevitt,et al.  Prognosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. A population-based study. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  O H Førde,et al.  The Tromsø Study. Distribution and population determinants of gamma-glutamyltransferase. , 1990, American journal of epidemiology.

[33]  G. Rubin,et al.  Changes in aneurysm volume after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2002, Journal of vascular surgery.

[34]  G. Meier,et al.  Is ultrasound more accurate than axial computed tomography for determination of maximal abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter? , 2004, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[35]  Gilles Soulez,et al.  Clinical validation of a software for quantitative follow-up of abdominal aortic aneurysm maximal diameter and growth by CT angiography. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[36]  E. Arnesen,et al.  The difference between ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) measurements of aortic diameter increases with aortic diameter: analysis of axial images of abdominal aortic and common iliac artery diameter in normal and aneurysmal aortas. The Tromsø Study, 1994-1995. , 2004, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery.

[37]  A. Comerota,et al.  Aortic Diameter is an Insensitive Measurement of Early Aneurysm Expansion after Endografting , 2004, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[38]  L J Schultze Kool,et al.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm measurements for endovascular repair: intra- and interobserver variability of CT measurements. , 1999, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[39]  D. C. Brewster,et al.  Guidelines for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Report of a subcommittee of the Joint Council of the American Association for Vascular Surgery and Society for Vascular Surgery. , 2003, Journal of vascular surgery.