Dynamic homology and phylogenetic systematics: a unified approach using POY

[1]  Measuring Topological Congruence by Extending Character Techniques , 1999 .

[2]  Fixed Character States and the Optimization of Molecular Sequence Data , 1999 .

[3]  Ward C. Wheeler,et al.  Optimization Alignment:Down,Up,Error,and Improvements , 2002 .

[4]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  The (Super)Tree of Life: Procedures, Problems, and Prospects , 2002 .

[5]  Search‐based optimization , 2003, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[6]  W. Wheeler.  OPTIMIZATION ALIGNMENT: THE END OF MULTIPLE SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT IN PHYLOGENETICS? , 1996 .

[7]  J. Farris,et al.  PARSIMONY JACKKNIFING OUTPERFORMS NEIGHBOR‐JOINING , 1996, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[8]  J. Thompson,et al.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  W. Wheeler.  Iterative pass optimization of sequence data , 2003 .

[11]  W. Wheeler.  Implied alignment: a synapomorphy‐based multiple‐sequence alignment method and its use in cladogram search , 2003, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[12]  W. Wheeler.  Homology and the Optimization of DNA Sequence Data , 2001, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[13]  John P. Huelsenbeck,et al.  MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models , 2003, Bioinform..