Developing Information Systems Design Knowledge: A Critical Realist Perspective

Academic Information Systems (IS) research has a serious utilization and relevance problem. To increase IS research utilization and relevance, scholars argue that the mainstream IS research, which is based on the behavioral science paradigm, should be complemented with research based on the design science paradigm. The current IS design science frameworks have a strong focus on the IT artefact, in most cases an exclusive focus on the IT artefact. The frameworks have very little discussion and clarifications regarding underpinning philosophies, but most seem to be based on positivism, traditional realism, or pragmatism. This paper presents an alternative framework for IS design science research. The framework builds on that the aim of IS design science research is to develop practical knowledge for the design and realization of different classes of IS initiatives, where IS are viewed as socio-technical systems and not just IT artefacts. The underpinning philosophy of the framework is critical realism which has been developed as an alternative to positivism and traditional realism as well as to constructivism (relativism). The framework proposes that the output of IS design science research is practical IS design knowledge in the form of field-tested and grounded technological rules. The IS design knowledge is developed through an IS design science research cycle. The paper presents how technological rules can be developed as well as the nature of such rules.

[1]  Kim Bartel Sheehan,et al.  E-mail Survey Response Rates: A Review , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[2]  Henry A. Landsberger,et al.  Major Social Issues: A Multidisciplinary View , 1978 .

[3]  Steven L. Alter.  Desperately Seeking Systems Thinking in the Information Systems Discipline , 2004, ICIS.

[4]  Stephen Ackroyd,et al.  Realist Perspectives on Management and Organisations , 2003 .

[5]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[6]  R. Torretti.  Mario Bunge: Scientific research. I. The search for system. II. The search for truth. Berlin Heidelberg. New York. Springer-Verlag. 1967 , 1967 .

[7]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[8]  Mansoor A. F. Kazi,et al.  Realist evaluation in practice , 2003 .

[9]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  The IS Core - VII: Towards Information Systems as a Science of Meta-Artifacts , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Ulf-Dietrich Reips,et al.  The Web Experiment Method , 2000 .

[11]  R. Bhaskar.  A realist theory of science , 1976 .

[12]  John Mingers,et al.  Re-Establishing the Real: Critical Realism and Information Systems , 2004 .

[13]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  The Double Hurdles for Management Research , 1997 .

[14]  Malcolm Williams.  New strategies in social research , 2006 .

[15]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[16]  J. Aken.  Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules , 2004 .

[17]  Pratibha A. Dabholkar,et al.  Incorporating Choice into an Attitudinal Framework: Analyzing Models of Mental Comparison Processes , 1994 .

[18]  Sven A. Carlsson.  Using Critical Realism in IS Research , 2004 .

[19]  James W. Fredrickson,et al.  Effects of Decision Motive and Organizational Performance Level on Strategic Decision Processes , 1985 .

[20]  J. March,et al.  Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol. , 1981 .

[21]  Stephen Ackroyd,et al.  Critical Realist Applications in Organisation and Management Studies , 2004 .

[22]  C. Benedetto.  Identifying the key success factors in new product launch , 1999 .

[23]  Mario Bunge,et al.  Is There a Scientific Method?@@@Scientific Research I: The Search for System@@@Scientific Research II: The Search for Truth , 1969 .

[24]  Sven A. Carlsson,et al.  Advancing Information Systems Evaluation (Research): A Critical Realist Approach , 2003 .

[25]  Daniel R. Dolk,et al.  Agent-based simulation for computational experimentation: Developing an artificial labor market , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  David M. Szymanski,et al.  Why Some New Products are More Successful than Others , 2001 .

[27]  R. Bhaskar.  From Science to Emancipation: Alienation and the Actuality of Enlightenment , 2003 .

[28]  Omar A. El Sawy,et al.  Assessing Information System Design Theory in Perspective: How Useful Was our 1992 Initial Rendition? , 2004 .

[29]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  The IS Core - VIII: Defining the Core Properties of the IS Disciplines: Not Yet, Not Now , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Basil G. Englis,et al.  Life/Style Online© a web-based methodology for visually-oriented consumer research , 2000 .

[31]  Venkataraman Ramesh,et al.  An analysis of research in computing disciplines , 2004, CACM.

[32]  J Fawcett,et al.  Analysis of research reports. , 1986, Journal of nurse-midwifery.

[33]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[34]  J. Fredrickson.  The Comprehensiveness of Strategic Decision Processes: Extension, Observations, Future Directions , 1984 .

[35]  Ram C. Rao,et al.  The Role of Experience in Information use and Decision Making by Marketing Managers , 1990 .

[36]  J. Stanton.  AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF DATA COLLECTION USING THE INTERNET , 1998 .

[37]  C. Merle Crawford,et al.  New Products Management , 1983 .

[38]  Amy B. Woszczynski,et al.  The Handbook of Information Systems Research , 2003 .

[39]  G. Zaltman.  Rethinking Market Research: Putting People Back In , 1997 .

[40]  Nicholas Walliman,et al.  Social research methods , 2006 .

[41]  Alistair Mutch,et al.  Actors and Networks or Agents and Structures: Towards a Realist View of Information Systems , 2002 .

[42]  Philip J. Dobson.  The Philosophy of Critical Realism—An Opportunity for Information Systems Research , 2001, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[43]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[44]  Upkar Varshney,et al.  Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 2000 .

[45]  C. Whitbeck,et al.  A Realist Theory of Science. , 1977 .

[46]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[47]  L. Willcocks,et al.  Social theory and philosophy for information systems , 2004 .

[48]  W. Souder,et al.  Managing New Product Innovations , 1987 .

[49]  Steve Fleetwood,et al.  The ontology of organisation and management studies , 2004 .

[50]  Melvin M. Mark,et al.  Evaluation: An Integrated Framework for Understanding, Guiding, and Improving Policies and Programs , 2000 .

[51]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001 , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[52]  Derek Layder.  Sociological Practice: Linking Theory and Social Research , 1998 .

[53]  Fadhel Kaboub.  Realistic Evaluation , 2004 .

[54]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Crisis in the IS Field? A Critical Reflection on the State of the Discipline , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..