Intelligent Transport Systems for Vehicle Drivers

The primary objective of Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) is to enhance efficiency and safety in traffic and transport, for a large part by eliminating (the effects of) traffic accidents as far as possible. The benefits of ITS implementations are potentially considerable, not in the least if a significant decrease in accidents can be established, decreasing human suffering, economical costs and pollution. However, there are also potential problems to be expected, since the task of driving a motor vehicle under ITS is changing from slight adaptations to fundamental transformations with considerable effects. Many of these effects pertain to changes in driver behavior.

[1]  H C Joksch,et al.  Velocity change and fatality risk in a crash--a rule of thumb. , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Jennifer J. Vardaman,et al.  Response to an Automated Function Failure Cue: An Operational Measure of Complacency , 1991 .

[3]  D. Shinar.  Psychology on the Road: The Human Factor in Traffic Safety , 1978 .

[4]  Samantha L Comte.  New systems: new behaviour? , 2000 .

[5]  F Van Ouwerkerk.  RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN ROAD TRANSPORT WORKING CONDITIONS, FATIGUE, HEALTH AND TRAFFIC SAFETY , 1987 .

[6]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Limiting speed, towards an intelligent speed adapter (ISA) , 1999 .

[7]  D M Zaidel,et al.  A VALIDATION STUDY OF A PC-BASED TEST OF SAFETY ASPECTS OF IN-VEHICLE INFORMATION SYSTEMS: A TEST OF A MAP DISPLAY VERSION OF A RDS-TMC TASK , 1997 .

[8]  P. J. Hoogeboom,et al.  Physiological indices for the estimation of momentary changes in cognitive workload and mental state , 2004 .

[9]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Modelling acceptability of the intelligent speed adapter , 2007 .

[10]  Kåre Rumar.  Collective risk but individual safety , 1988 .

[11]  Marika Hoedemaeker,et al.  Driver behavior in an emergency situation in the Automated Highway System , 1999 .

[12]  Zosia Kmietovicz.  R.E.S.P.E.C.T.—why doctors are still getting enough of it , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  E Bekiaris,et al.  DRIVER NEEDS AND PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE REGARDING TELEMATIC IN-VEHICLE EMERGENCY CONTROL AIDS , 1997 .

[14]  Vincent Marchau,et al.  Desirability of advanced driver assistance from road safety perspective: the case of ISA , 2005 .

[15]  A. Várhelyi,et al.  The effects of in-car speed limiters – Field studies , 2001 .

[16]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  The relationship between distraction and driving performance: towards a test regime for in-vehicle information systems , 2005 .

[17]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[18]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  ADAS' Acceptance and Effects on Behaviour , 2005 .

[19]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  Human factors and safety in the design of intelligent vehicle-highway systems (IVHS) , 1992 .

[20]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  ACC effects on driving speed - a second look , 2005 .

[21]  Lisanne Bainbridge,et al.  Ironies of automation , 1982, Autom..

[22]  K. A. BROOKHUIS,et al.  Criteria for driver impairment , 2003, Ergonomics.

[23]  Mustapha Mouloua,et al.  Effects of Adaptive Task Allocation on Monitoring of Automated Systems , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[24]  Renwick E. Curry,et al.  Flight-deck automation: promises and problems , 1980 .

[25]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Behavioural effects of Advanced Cruise Control Use - a meta-analytic approach , 2005 .

[26]  A J Belyavin,et al.  Pilots' Attitudes to Cockpit Automation , 1991 .

[27]  A Johansson.  INTELLIGENT SPEED ADAPTATION , 1999 .

[28]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Monitoring an Automated System for a Single Failure: Vigilance and Task Complexity Effects , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[29]  Toshiyuki Inagaki,et al.  Attention and complacency , 2000 .

[30]  Linda Steg,et al.  Threats from Car Traffic to the Quality of Urban Life: Problems, Causes and Solutions , 2007 .

[31]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  Fatigue and Automation-Induced Impairments in Simulated Driving Performance , 1998 .

[32]  R. Norton,et al.  Driver sleepiness and risk of serious injury to car occupants: population based case control study , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[33]  L Nilsson,et al.  COLLISON AVOIDANCE SYSTEMS - EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF TASK ALLOCATION ON DRIVER BEHAVIOUR , 1991 .

[34]  John A. Michon,et al.  Generic intelligent drive support , 1993 .

[35]  O M J Carsten,et al.  Intelligent speed adaptation: accident savings and cost-benefit analysis. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.