Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: evolution of the technique and experience with 2400 cases.

OBJECTIVES We report the outcome of 2400 endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EERPE) cases performed in three institutions, with emphasis on the evolution of the EERPE technique. METHODS In total, 2400 EERPE procedures were performed in three institutions. Several surgeons performed the operations. The presented cases also include the learning curve of the surgeons. EERPE was performed in all cases of localized prostate cancer with the same indications to open and transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. RESULTS Average patient age was 63.3 years (range 41-81 years), and mean preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) level was 9.8 ng/mL (range 0.08-93 ng/mL); 857 (38%) patients had previously undergone abdominal or pelvic surgery, while 143 (5.8%) patients had prior prostatic treatment. Pelvic lymph node dissection took place in 1219 (50.8%) patients. Bilateral nerve sparing was performed in 672 patients and unilateral in 284 patients; 100 patients underwent intraoperative hernia repair with mesh placement (82 unilateral and 18 bilateral). Mean operative time was 150.7 minutes (range 50-340 minutes). Conversion to open surgery was never deemed necessary. Fifteen patients received transfusion (0.7%). The mean catheterization time was 6.19 days (range 3-40 days). Overall, 71.7% and 94.7% of the patients were continent at 3 and 12 months, respectively. Totally, 956 patients were treated with nerve-sparing procedure either interfascial or intrafascial; 672 patients underwent bilateral neurovascular bundle preservation, and 284, unilateral. Younger patients tend to have better postoperative potency. Bilateral nerve-sparing EERPE in patients younger than 55 years results in potency rate of 32.4%, 75.3%, and 84.9% at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS The functional and oncological outcome of EERPE is comparable to other approaches for radical prostatectomy. Continuous refinements contribute to the improving outcome of the procedure. Long-term results especially in terms of oncological efficacy are expected.

[1]  M. Thoulouzan,et al.  [Nerve-sparing open radical prostatectomy with extracapsular dissection]. , 2009, Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie.

[2]  S. Barmoshe,et al.  Nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: our technique. , 2006, European urology.

[3]  R. Rabenalt,et al.  Modular Training for Residents with no Prior Experience with Open Pelvic Surgery in Endoscopic Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy , 2006 .

[4]  N. Demartines,et al.  Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey , 2004, Annals of Surgery.

[5]  S Duke Herrell,et al.  Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 2005, Urology.

[6]  M. Menon,et al.  Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. , 2009, European urology.

[7]  R. Rosen,et al.  Research instruments for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with erectile dysfunction. , 2006, Urology.

[8]  A. Patriciu,et al.  Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: effects of hemostatic energy sources on the recovery of cavernous nerve function in a canine model. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[9]  T. Peters,et al.  Scoring the short form ICSmaleSF questionnaire. International Continence Society. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[10]  R. Rabenalt,et al.  Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: the University of Leipzig experience of 2000 cases. , 2008, Journal of endourology.

[11]  R. Rabenalt,et al.  Intrafascial nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. , 2008, European urology.

[12]  R. Rabenalt,et al.  Intrafascial nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. , 2007, Urology.

[13]  S. Herrell,et al.  Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of postoperative pain. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[14]  B. Guillonneau,et al.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 240 procedures. , 2001, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[15]  D. Grignon,et al.  Radical prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation: impact of a positive margin. , 2003, European urology.

[16]  Ashutosh Tewari,et al.  Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. , 2002, Urology.

[17]  R. Rabenalt,et al.  Reduction in incidence of lymphocele following extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection by bilateral peritoneal fenestration , 2008, World Journal of Urology.

[18]  M. Gettman,et al.  Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy , 2007 .

[19]  C. Deliveliotis,et al.  Radical prostatectomy: bladder neck preservation and puboprostatic ligament sparing--effects on continence and positive margins. , 2002, Urology.

[20]  T. Kessler,et al.  Nerve-sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 2007, European urology.

[21]  U. Nagele,et al.  The periprostatic autonomic nerves--bundle or layer? , 2008, European urology.

[22]  Dogu Teber,et al.  Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[23]  J. Stolzenburg,et al.  Nerve‐sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy , 2008, BJU international.

[24]  B. Guillonneau,et al.  Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: outlining the problem and its long-term consequences. , 2009, European urology.

[25]  S. Loening,et al.  Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy , 2001, European Urology.

[26]  R. Rabenalt,et al.  Nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: University of Leipzig technique. , 2006, Journal of endourology.

[27]  Y. Kaiho,et al.  Nerves at the ventral prostatic capsule contribute to erectile function: initial electrophysiological assessment in humans. , 2009, European urology.

[28]  M. Srougi,et al.  Urinary continence and pathological outcome after bladder neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy: a randomized prospective trial. , 2001, The Journal of urology.