Harnessing consumer smartphone and wearable sensors for clinical cancer research

As smartphones and consumer wearable devices become more ubiquitous, there is a growing opportunity to capture rich mobile sensor data continuously, passively, and in real-world settings with minimal burden. In the context of cancer, changes in these passively sensed digital biomarkers may reflect meaningful variation in functional status, symptom burden, quality of life, and risk for adverse clinical outcomes. These data could enable real-time remote monitoring of patients between clinical encounters and more proactive, comprehensive, and personalized care. Over the past few years, small studies across a variety of cancer populations support the feasibility and potential clinical value of mobile sensors in oncology. Barriers to implementing mobile sensing in clinical oncology care include the challenges of managing and making sense of continuous sensor data, patient engagement issues, difficulty integrating sensor data into existing electronic health systems and clinical workflows, and ethical and privacy concerns. Multidisciplinary collaboration is needed to develop mobile sensing frameworks that overcome these barriers and that can be implemented at large-scale for remote monitoring of deteriorating health during or after cancer treatment or for promotion and tailoring of lifestyle or symptom management interventions. Leveraging digital technology has the potential to enrich scientific understanding of how cancer and its treatment affect patient lives, to use this understanding to offer more timely and personalized support to patients, and to improve clinical oncology outcomes.

[1]  K. Volpp,et al.  Accuracy of smartphone applications and wearable devices for tracking physical activity data. , 2015, JAMA.

[2]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Mobile Phone Sensor Correlates of Depressive Symptom Severity in Daily-Life Behavior: An Exploratory Study , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[3]  Arjun Gupta,et al.  Promise of Wearable Physical Activity Monitors in Oncology Practice. , 2017, Journal of oncology practice.

[4]  Seyed Ali Rokni,et al.  Digital Health for Geriatric Oncology. , 2018, JCO clinical cancer informatics.

[5]  E. Basch,et al.  Emerging uses of patient generated health data in clinical research , 2015, Molecular oncology.

[6]  Sameer M. Siddiqi,et al.  Physical activity, biomarkers, and disease outcomes in cancer survivors: a systematic review. , 2012, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  Arti Hurria,et al.  A pilot study of an accelerometer-equipped smartphone to monitor older adults with cancer receiving chemotherapy in Mexico. , 2017, Journal of geriatric oncology.

[8]  M. Kris,et al.  Overall Survival Results of a Trial Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes for Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Treatment , 2017, JAMA.

[9]  A. Cuesta-Vargas,et al.  Inertial Sensors Embedded in Smartphones as a Tool for Fatigue Assessment Based on Acceleration in Survivors of Breast Cancer. , 2020, Physical therapy.

[10]  B. Eskofier,et al.  Assessment of gait parameters and physical function in patients with advanced cancer participating in a 12-week exercise and nutrition programme: A controlled clinical trial. , 2019, European journal of cancer care.

[11]  Simon Hunter,et al.  Randomized controlled trial of a 12-week digital care program in improving low back pain , 2019, npj Digital Medicine.

[12]  Cho Y. Lam,et al.  The use of ambulatory assessment in smoking cessation. , 2018, Addictive behaviors.

[13]  Subashan Perera,et al.  Accuracy and Acceptability of Commercial-Grade Physical Activity Monitors in Older Adults. , 2019, Journal of aging and physical activity.

[14]  K. Mehta,et al.  Continuous Activity Monitoring During Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy. , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Vaibhav A. Narayan,et al.  Mobile and pervasive computing technologies and the future of Alzheimer’s clinical trials , 2018, npj Digital Medicine.

[16]  S. Kalnicki,et al.  Daily step counts: A new prognostic factor in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer? , 2019, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Steven Piantadosi,et al.  Wearable activity monitors in oncology trials: Current use of an emerging technology. , 2018, Contemporary clinical trials.

[18]  G. Tröster,et al.  Mobile Health Technologies for Continuous Monitoring of Cancer Patients in Palliative Care Aiming to Predict Health Status Deterioration: A Feasibility Study. , 2019, Journal of palliative medicine.

[19]  A. Dicker,et al.  Big Data From Small Devices: The Future of Smartphones in Oncology. , 2019, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[20]  T. Kiuchi,et al.  Patient-generated health data collection using a wearable activity tracker in cancer patients—a feasibility study , 2020, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[21]  Sean Khozin,et al.  Developing and adopting safe and effective digital biomarkers to improve patient outcomes , 2019, npj Digital Medicine.

[22]  S. Coughlin,et al.  Use of consumer wearable devices to promote physical activity among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors: a review of health intervention studies , 2020, Journal of Cancer Survivorship.

[23]  Paul J. Nietert,et al.  Assessing the Correlation Between Physical Activity and Quality of Life in Advanced Lung Cancer , 2016, Integrative cancer therapies.

[24]  Yue Liao,et al.  The Future of Wearable Technologies and Remote Monitoring in Health Care. , 2019, American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting.

[25]  B. Spring,et al.  Toward a precision behavioral medicine approach to addressing high-risk sun exposure: a qualitative analysis , 2019, JAMIA open.

[26]  Andrea L. Hartzler,et al.  Acceptability of Fitbit for Physical activity Tracking within Clinical Care Among Men with Prostate Cancer , 2016, AMIA.

[27]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Exercise Interventions for Cancer Survivors: A Meta-Analysis of Quality of Life Outcomes , 2011, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[28]  L. Cadmus-Bertram,et al.  Building a physical activity intervention into clinical care for breast and colorectal cancer survivors in Wisconsin: a randomized controlled pilot trial , 2019, Journal of Cancer Survivorship.

[29]  D. Mohr,et al.  Personal Sensing: Understanding Mental Health Using Ubiquitous Sensors and Machine Learning. , 2017, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[30]  W. McCaskill-Stevens,et al.  Reporting of health‐related quality of life endpoints in National Cancer Institute–supported cancer treatment trials , 2020, Cancer.

[31]  Feasibility, validity and reliability of objective smartphone measurements of physical activity and fitness in patients with cancer , 2018, BMC Cancer.

[32]  B. Spring,et al.  Toward a health-promoting system for cancer survivors: Patient and provider multiple behavior change. , 2019, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[33]  C. Heckler,et al.  Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of Exercise Interventions Using Digital Activity Trackers in Patients With Cancer. , 2019, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[34]  Renu Joshi,et al.  A Low-Power, Low-Cost Ingestible and Wearable Sensing Platform to Measure Medication Adherence and Physiological Signals , 2018, 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[35]  Krina C. Durica,et al.  A Real-Time Mobile Intervention to Reduce Sedentary Behavior Before and After Cancer Surgery: Usability and Feasibility Study , 2020, JMIR perioperative medicine.

[36]  Arjun Gupta,et al.  Feasibility of Wearable Physical Activity Monitors in Patients With Cancer. , 2018, JCO clinical cancer informatics.

[37]  H. Jim,et al.  Innovations in research and clinical care using patient‐generated health data , 2020, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[38]  David Alexander Ellis,et al.  Do smartphone usage scales predict behavior? , 2019, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[39]  Virginia T. LeBaron,et al.  Leveraging Smart Health Technology to Empower Patients and Family Caregivers in Managing Cancer Pain: Protocol for a Feasibility Study , 2019, JMIR research protocols.

[40]  Samuel L Volchenboum,et al.  Use of Wearable, Mobile, and Sensor Technology in Cancer Clinical Trials. , 2018, JCO clinical cancer informatics.

[41]  Matthew P Buman,et al.  Wearable Technology and Physical Activity in Chronic Disease: Opportunities and Challenges. , 2018, American journal of preventive medicine.

[42]  S. Sentovich,et al.  Wireless Monitoring Program of Patient-Centered Outcomes and Recovery Before and After Major Abdominal Cancer Surgery , 2017, JAMA surgery.

[43]  Barbara L. Smith,et al.  Using Smartphones to Capture Novel Recovery Metrics After Cancer Surgery. , 2020, JAMA surgery.

[44]  Patrick C. Staples,et al.  The HOPE Pilot Study: Harnessing Patient-Reported Outcomes and Biometric Data to Enhance Cancer Care. , 2018, JCO clinical cancer informatics.

[45]  Adam P Dicker,et al.  Clinical Integration of Digital Solutions in Health Care: An Overview of the Current Landscape of Digital Technologies in Cancer Care. , 2018, JCO clinical cancer informatics.

[46]  E. Basch,et al.  Evaluation of pedometry as a patient-centered outcome in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT): a comparison of pedometry and patient reports of symptoms, health, and quality of life , 2016, Quality of Life Research.

[47]  Emilia Farcas,et al.  Identifying early dehydration risk with home-based sensors during radiation treatment: a feasibility study on patients with head and neck cancer. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[48]  Curtis L. Meinert,et al.  Wearable activity monitors to assess performance status and predict clinical outcomes in advanced cancer patients , 2018, npj Digital Medicine.

[49]  A. Dey,et al.  Estimation of Symptom Severity During Chemotherapy From Passively Sensed Data: Exploratory Study , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[50]  Mehdi Boukhechba,et al.  An integrated framework for using mobile sensing to understand response to mobile interventions among breast cancer patients , 2020 .

[51]  Stacey A. Kenfield,et al.  The Fitbit One Physical Activity Tracker in Men With Prostate Cancer: Validation Study , 2017, JMIR cancer.

[52]  Y. Molina,et al.  The use of survivorship care plans by female racial and ethnic minority breast cancer survivors: a systematic review , 2020, Journal of cancer survivorship.

[53]  F. Penedo,et al.  The increasing value of eHealth in the delivery of patient-centred cancer care. , 2020, The Lancet. Oncology.

[54]  Svetha Venkatesh,et al.  Toward clinical digital phenotyping: a timely opportunity to consider purpose, quality, and safety , 2019, npj Digital Medicine.

[55]  Gerhard Tröster,et al.  Feasibility and Usability Aspects of Continuous Remote Monitoring of Health Status in Palliative Cancer Patients Using Wearables , 2019, Oncology.

[56]  Rebecca J Bartlett Ellis,et al.  Building the case for actionable ethics in digital health research supported by artificial intelligence , 2019, BMC Medicine.

[57]  John A Rogers,et al.  Skin sensors are the future of health care , 2019, Nature.

[58]  Brigid M Lynch,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of a wearable technology‐based intervention for increasing moderate to vigorous physical activity and reducing sedentary behavior in breast cancer survivors: The ACTIVATE Trial , 2019, Cancer.

[59]  Sarah T. Jewell,et al.  The association between clinician-based common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) and patient-reported outcomes (PRO): a systematic review , 2016, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[60]  Rui Wang,et al.  Using Smartphones to Collect Behavioral Data in Psychological Science , 2016, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[61]  Brennan M. R. Spiegel,et al.  Impact of remote patient monitoring on clinical outcomes: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2018, npj Digital Medicine.

[62]  V. Shankar,et al.  Acceptability and feasibility of a Fitbit physical activity monitor for endometrial cancer survivors. , 2018, Gynecologic oncology.

[63]  Dana H Bovbjerg,et al.  Fitbit step counts during inpatient recovery from cancer surgery as a predictor of readmission. , 2018, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[64]  M. Keshavan,et al.  New dimensions and new tools to realize the potential of RDoC: digital phenotyping via smartphones and connected devices , 2017, Translational Psychiatry.

[65]  T. Insel Digital Phenotyping: Technology for a New Science of Behavior. , 2017, JAMA.

[66]  W. Wood,et al.  Establishing physical activity in breast cancer: self-report versus activity tracker , 2019, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.