Interference resisting design for guided wave tomography

RAPID (reconstruction algorithm for the probabilistic inspection of damage) is a new promising tomography approach for the detection and monitoring of critical areas in a structure. With the sensors permanently installed on or embedded in structures, changes in effective thickness and material properties caused by structural damage can be detected and mapped to the tomogram. However, in this method, the tomographic feature SDC (signal difference coefficient) captures the overall change of the received ultrasonic signals, which makes it sensitive to environmental factors (e.g. rain, changes in temperature and humidity). As a result, the approach is restricted in the laboratory environment. In this paper, the influence of measurement data length on the SDC and the tomogram are investigated, and a new strategy is established on how to choose the measurement data to obtain good reconstruction by matching the coverage zone of each transmitter–receiver pair with the corresponding affected zone. The proposed method is then applied to identify defects of the specimen in the presence of external sources of interference, such as water droplets and structural variations outside the critical area. The results demonstrate its capability of improved robustness in the presence of external sources of interference.

[1]  P. Cawley,et al.  The interaction of Lamb waves with defects , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[2]  D. Hutchins,et al.  Immersion tomography using Rayleigh and Lamb waves , 1992 .

[3]  I. A. Viktorov Rayleigh and Lamb Waves , 1967 .

[4]  Joseph L. Rose,et al.  Guided Wave Tomography on an Aircraft Wing with Leave in Place Sensors , 2005 .

[5]  P. Cawley,et al.  The low frequency reflection characteristics of the fundamental antisymmetric Lamb wave a0 from a rectangular notch in a plate. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  Embedded-ultrasonics Structural Radar for In Situ Structural Health Monitoring of Thin-wall Structures , 2004 .

[7]  Steven E. Owens,et al.  Ultrasonic Lamb wave tomography in structural health monitoring , 2011 .

[8]  Peter Cawley,et al.  LAMB WAVE TOMOGRAPHY TO EVALUATE THE MAXIMUM DEPTH OF CORROSION PATCHES , 2008 .

[9]  M. Hinders,et al.  Automatic multi-mode Lamb wave arrival time extraction for improved tomographic reconstruction , 2004 .

[10]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  Lamb wave generation with piezoelectric wafer active sensors for structural health monitoring , 2003, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[11]  K. Saraswat,et al.  In situ acoustic temperature tomography of semiconductor wafers , 1994 .

[12]  M. Hinders,et al.  PARALLEL PROJECTION AND CROSSHOLE LAMB WAVE CONTACT SCANNING TOMOGRAPHY , 1999 .

[13]  M. Lowe,et al.  Low-frequency reflection characteristics of the s0 lamb wave from a rectangular notch in a plate. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  D. Hutchins,et al.  Lamb-wave tomography using non-contact transduction , 1993 .

[15]  Z. Su,et al.  Identification of Damage Using Lamb Waves , 2009 .

[16]  Mauro Serpelloni,et al.  Kinetic and thermal energy harvesters for implantable medical devices and biomedical autonomous sensors , 2013 .

[17]  M. Hinders,et al.  Fan beam and double crosshole Lamb wave tomography for mapping flaws in aging aircraft structures. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Joseph L. Rose,et al.  GUIDED WAVE ANNULAR ARRAY SENSOR DESIGN FOR IMPROVED TOMOGRAPHIC IMAGING , 2009 .

[19]  D. Hutchins,et al.  Lamb wave tomography of advanced composite laminates containing damage , 1994 .

[20]  Dong Wang,et al.  Probabilistic damage identification based on correlation analysis using guided wave signals in aluminum plates , 2010 .

[21]  Dong Wang,et al.  A Probabilistic Diagnostic Algorithm for Identification of Multiple Notches Using Digital Damage Fingerprints (DDFs) , 2009 .

[22]  Paul D. Wilcox,et al.  Mode and Transducer Selection for Long Range Lamb Wave Inspection , 1999 .

[23]  Krishnan Balasubramaniam,et al.  Structural health monitoring of composite structures using Lamb wave tomography , 2004 .

[24]  Jan Drewes Achenbach,et al.  Lamb Wave Tomography Using Laser-Based Ultrasonics , 1995 .

[25]  M. Hinders,et al.  Ultrasonic Lamb wave diffraction tomography. , 2001, Ultrasonics.

[26]  V. Giurgiutiu Tuned Lamb Wave Excitation and Detection with Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring , 2005 .

[27]  Dong Wang,et al.  Probability of the presence of damage estimated from an active sensor network in a composite panel of multiple stiffeners , 2009 .

[28]  Peter Cawley,et al.  Feasibility of low frequency straight-ray guided wave tomography , 2009 .

[29]  D. Jansen,et al.  Air-coupled Lamb wave tomography , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[30]  S. Quek,et al.  Detection of cracks in plates using piezo-actuated Lamb waves , 2004 .

[31]  Younho Cho,et al.  A study on quantitative lamb wave tomogram via modified RAPID algorithm with shape factor optimization , 2012 .

[32]  Joseph L. Rose,et al.  A comparison of embedded sensor Lamb wave ultrasonic tomography approaches for material loss detection , 2006 .

[33]  Joseph L. Rose,et al.  Active health monitoring of an aircraft wing with embedded piezoelectric sensor/actuator network: I. Defect detection, localization and growth monitoring , 2007 .

[34]  Dong Wang,et al.  A damage diagnostic imaging algorithm based on the quantitative comparison of Lamb wave signals , 2010 .