Seasonal variation in the temperature sensitivity of proteolytic enzyme activity in temperate forest soils

[1] Increasing soil temperature has the potential to alter the activity of the extracellular enzymes that mobilize nitrogen (N) from soil organic matter (SOM) and ultimately the availability of N for primary production. Proteolytic enzymes depolymerize N from proteinaceous components of SOM into amino acids, and their activity is a principal driver of the within-system cycle of soil N. The objectives of this study were to investigate whether the soils of temperate forest tree species differ in the temperature sensitivity of proteolytic enzyme activity over the growing season and the role of substrate limitation in regulating temperature sensitivity. Across species and sampling dates, proteolytic enzyme activity had relatively low sensitivity to temperature with a mean activation energy (Ea) of 33.5 kJ mol−1. Ea declined in white ash, American beech, and eastern hemlock soils across the growing season as soils warmed. By contrast, Eain sugar maple soil increased across the growing season. We used these data to develop a species-specific empirical model of proteolytic enzyme activity for the 2009 calendar year and studied the interactive effects of soil temperature (ambient or +5°C) and substrate limitation (ambient or elevated protein) on enzyme activity. Declines in substrate limitation had a larger single-factor effect on proteolytic enzyme activity than temperature, particularly in the spring. There was, however, a large synergistic effect of increasing temperature and substrate supply on proteolytic enzyme activity. Our results suggest limited increases in N availability with climate warming unless there is a parallel increase in the availability of protein substrates.

[1]  L. Landi,et al.  Determination of extracellular neutral phosphomonoesterase activity in soil , 1996 .

[2]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Effects of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide on amino acid and NH4+‐N cycling in a temperate pine ecosystem , 2007 .

[3]  C. Drury,et al.  Temperature dependence of soil nitrogen mineralization rate: Comparison of mathematical models, reference temperatures and origin of the soils , 2010 .

[4]  Charles D. Canham,et al.  CANOPY TREE–SOIL INTERACTIONS WITHIN TEMPERATE FORESTS: SPECIES EFFECTS ON SOIL CARBON AND NITROGEN , 1998 .

[5]  K. Weathers,et al.  Nitrogen cycling in a northern hardwood forest: Do species matter? , 2004 .

[6]  U. Feller,et al.  Rubiscolytics: fate of Rubisco after its enzymatic function in a cell is terminated. , 2007, Journal of experimental botany.

[7]  E. Brzostek,et al.  Substrate supply, fine roots, and temperature control proteolytic enzyme activity in temperate forest soils. , 2011, Ecology.

[8]  P. Sollins,et al.  Organic C and N stabilization in a forest soil: Evidence from sequential density fractionation , 2006 .

[9]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Consequences of Considering Carbon–Nitrogen Interactions on the Feedbacks between Climate and the Terrestrial Carbon Cycle , 2008 .

[10]  S. Allison,et al.  Substrate concentration and enzyme allocation can affect rates of microbial decomposition. , 2011, Ecology.

[11]  A. Finzi,et al.  Amino Acid Cycling in Three Cold-Temperate Forests of the Northeastern USA , 2006 .

[12]  S. Allison,et al.  Low levels of nitrogen addition stimulate decomposition by boreal forest fungi , 2009 .

[13]  E. Perfect,et al.  Protection of organic carbon in soil microaggregates via restructuring of aggregate porosity and filling of pores with accumulating organic matter , 2008 .

[14]  J. Schimel,et al.  Seasonal variation in enzyme activities and temperature sensitivities in Arctic tundra soils , 2009 .

[15]  M. Mack,et al.  Kinetic studies of proteolytic enzyme activity of arctic soils under varying toluene concentrations , 2011 .

[16]  W. Frankenberger,et al.  Use of plasmolytic agents and antiseptics in soil enzyme assays , 1986 .

[17]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  Terrestrial nitrogen feedbacks may accelerate future climate change , 2010 .

[18]  H. Wösten,et al.  Role of proteins in soil carbon and nitrogen storage: controls on persistence , 2007 .

[19]  R. Monson,et al.  An empirical model of amino acid transformations in an alpine soil , 2001 .

[20]  N. Fierer,et al.  Widespread coupling between the rate and temperature sensitivity of organic matter decay , 2010 .

[21]  David R. Foster,et al.  Land-Use History (1730-1990) and Vegetation Dynamics in Central New England, USA , 1992 .

[22]  A. Finzi,et al.  Differential effects of sugar maple, red oak, and hemlock tannins on carbon and nitrogen cycling in temperate forest soils , 2008, Oecologia.

[23]  Benjamin P Colman,et al.  Amino acid abundance and proteolytic potential in North American soils , 2010, Oecologia.

[24]  Jerry M. Melillo,et al.  Soil Warming and Carbon-Cycle Feedbacks to the Climate System , 2002, Science.

[25]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Factors controlling CO2 exchange on timescales from hourly to decadal at Harvard Forest , 2007 .

[26]  C. Freeman,et al.  Observations of a seasonally shifting thermal optimum in peatland carbon-cycling processes; implications for the global carbon cycle and soil enzyme methodologies , 2005 .

[27]  G. Somero,et al.  Temperature Adaptation of Enzymes: Biological Optimization Through Structure-Function Compromises , 1978 .

[28]  R. Dahlgren,et al.  Tannins in nutrient dynamics of forest ecosystems - a review , 2003, Plant and Soil.

[29]  Ricardo Cavicchioli,et al.  Cold-adapted enzymes. , 2006, Annual review of biochemistry.

[30]  Gordon B. Bonan,et al.  Soil temperature, nitrogen mineralization, and carbon source–sink relationships in boreal forests , 1992 .

[31]  A. J. Dolman,et al.  Spatial and temporal dynamics in eddy covariance observations of methane fluxes at a tundra site in Northeastern Siberia , 2011 .

[32]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Carbon-nitrogen interactions regulate climate-carbon cycle feedbacks: results from an atmosphere-ocean general circulation model , 2009 .

[33]  Vikki L. Rodgers,et al.  Intact amino acid uptake by northern hardwood and conifer trees , 2009, Oecologia.

[34]  David R. Foster,et al.  Disturbance history, community organization and vegetation dynamics of the old-growth pisgah forest, South-Western New Hampshire, U.S.A , 1988 .

[35]  Noah Fierer,et al.  Predicting the temperature dependence of microbial respiration in soil: A continental‐scale analysis , 2006 .

[36]  K. Pregitzer,et al.  Soil temperature, matric potential, and the kinetics of microbial respiration and nitrogen mineralization , 1999 .

[37]  David L. Jones,et al.  Simple method to enable the high resolution determination of total free amino acids in soil solutions and soil extracts , 2002 .

[38]  M. Tabatabai,et al.  Cellulase activity of soils , 1994 .

[39]  R. Bradley,et al.  Soil enzyme inhibition by condensed litter tannins may drive ecosystem structure and processes: the case of Kalmia angustifolia. , 2007, The New phytologist.

[40]  D. Rothstein.  Soil amino-acid availability across a temperate-forest fertility gradient , 2009 .

[41]  A. Finzi,et al.  THE UPTAKE OF AMINO ACIDS BY MICROBES AND TREES IN THREE COLD‐TEMPERATE FORESTS , 2005 .

[42]  J. Schimel,et al.  Seasonal protein dynamics in Alaskan arctic tundra soils , 2005 .

[43]  David L. Jones,et al.  Critical evaluation of methods for determining total protein in soil solution , 2008 .

[44]  R. Monson,et al.  LINKS BETWEEN MICROBIAL POPULATION DYNAMICS AND NITROGEN AVAILABILITY IN AN ALPINE ECOSYSTEM , 1999 .

[45]  D. Barraclough.  The direct or MIT route for nitrogen immobilization: A 15N mirror image study with leucine and glycine , 1997 .

[46]  E. Davidson,et al.  The Dual Arrhenius and Michaelis–Menten kinetics model for decomposition of soil organic matter at hourly to seasonal time scales , 2012 .

[47]  J. Schimel,et al.  NITROGEN MINERALIZATION: CHALLENGES OF A CHANGING PARADIGM , 2004 .

[48]  H. Schulten,et al.  The chemistry of soil organic nitrogen: a review , 1997, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[49]  E. Kandeler,et al.  Temperature sensitivity of microbial respiration, nitrogen mineralization, and potential soil enzyme activities in organic alpine soils , 2007 .

[50]  S. Arrhenius.  Über die Reaktionsgeschwindigkeit bei der Inversion von Rohrzucker durch Säuren , 1889 .

[51]  S. Hobbie,et al.  The effects of substrate composition, quantity, and diversity on microbial activity , 2010, Plant and Soil.

[52]  R. Dahlgren,et al.  Linking Chemical Reactivity and Protein Precipitation to Structural Characteristics of Foliar Tannins , 2003, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[53]  Mark A. Bradford,et al.  Soil-carbon response to warming dependent on microbial physiology , 2010 .

[54]  K. Hayano,et al.  Seasonal variation of soil protease activities and their relation to proteolytic bacteria and Bacillus spp in paddy field soil , 1995 .

[55]  W. Horwath,et al.  Regulation of extracellular protease activity in soil in response to different sources and concentrations of nitrogen and carbon. , 2008 .

[56]  W. Bowman,et al.  Litter effects of two co-occurring alpine species on plant growth, microbial activity and immobilization of nitrogen , 2004 .

[57]  E. Davidson,et al.  Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change , 2006, Nature.

[58]  Joshua P. Schimel,et al.  Temperature controls of microbial respiration in arctic tundra soils above and below freezing , 2002 .