Variations in Velocity and Sensitivity of Electromagnetic Waves in Transmission Lines Configured in Model Piles with Necking Defects Containing Soils

This study investigates variations in the velocity and sensitivity of electromagnetic waves in transmission lines configured in defective model piles for the detection of necking defects containing soil. Experiments are performed with model piles containing defects filled with different materials, such as air, sands, and clay. Five different types of transmission lines are configured in model piles. The electromagnetic waves are generated and detected using a time domain reflectometer. The velocity of electromagnetic waves is highest when the defect is filled with air, and it decreases with an increase in the water content. The velocity is lowest when the defect is filled with clay. The sensitivity of transmission lines for detecting defects decreases with an increase in soil water contents. The transmission line with a single electrical wire and epoxy-coated rebar exhibits the highest sensitivity, followed by that with three and two parallel electrical wires. Transmission lines with a single electrical wire and uncoated rebar and those with two parallel electrical wires wrapped with a sheath exhibit poor sensitivity when the defect is filled with clay. This study demonstrates that electromagnetic waves can be effective tools for detecting necking defects with wet and conductive soils in bored piles.

[1]  R. R. Allmaras,et al.  System for Automating and Multiplexing Soil Moisture Measurement by Time‐Domain Reflectometry , 1990 .

[2]  Marcin Kafarski,et al.  A Time-Domain Reflectometry Method with Variable Needle Pulse Width for Measuring the Dielectric Properties of Materials , 2016, Sensors.

[3]  Dennis Timlin,et al.  Comparison of Three Methods to Obtain the Apparent Dielectric Constant from Time Domain Reflectometry Wave Traces , 1996 .

[4]  G. C. Topp,et al.  Electromagnetic Determination of Soil Water Content Using TDR: I. Applications to Wetting Fronts and Steep Gradients , 1982 .

[5]  D. Or,et al.  Time domain reflectometry measurement principles and applications , 2002 .

[6]  Richard J. Finno,et al.  CUTOFF FREQUENCIES FOR IMPULSE RESPONSE TESTS OF EXISTING FOUNDATIONS , 2000 .

[7]  H. Muto,et al.  Partial discharge inception voltage for two insulating materials (PVC and PE) under inverter surge voltage , 2003, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Properties and Applications of Dielectric Materials (Cat. No.03CH37417).

[8]  M. Steer.  Microwave and RF Design: A Systems Approach , 2008 .

[9]  Michael W. O'Neill.  CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES AND DEFECTS IN DRILLED SHAFTS , 1991 .

[10]  H. Smalley.  The systems approach. , 1972, Hospitals.

[11]  Scott B. Jones,et al.  Standardizing Characterization of Electromagnetic Water Content Sensors: Part 2. Evaluation of Seven Sensing Systems , 2005 .

[12]  Aramis Lopez,et al.  Analysis of Methods Used in Time Domain Reflectometry Response , 1996 .

[13]  Shmulik P. Friedman,et al.  Parallel Plates Compared with Conventional Rods as TDR Waveguides for Sensing Soil Moisture , 2000 .

[14]  C. P. Smyth,et al.  Dielectrics and Waves. , 1955 .

[15]  F. Ulaby.  Fundamentals of applied electromagnetics , 1998 .

[16]  Sheng-Huoo Ni,et al.  Low-strain integrity testing of drilled piles with high slenderness ratio , 2006 .

[18]  John Knight,et al.  The sample areas of conventional and alternative time domain reflectometry probes , 1998 .

[19]  Frank Rausche.  Non-Destructive Evaluation of Deep Foundations , 2004 .

[20]  D. Or,et al.  Temperature effects on soil bulk dielectric permittivity measured by time domain reflectometry: A physical model , 1999 .

[21]  A. A. Maryott,et al.  Dielectric constant of water from 0 to 100 C , 1956 .

[22]  R. Kachanoski,et al.  Spatial averaging of water content by time domain reflectometry : Implications for twin rod probes with and without dielectric coatings , 1996 .

[23]  Chih-Ping Lin,et al.  Frequency Domain Versus Travel Time Analyses of TDR Waveforms for Soil Moisture Measurements , 2003 .

[24]  Craig Nichol,et al.  Evaluation of uncoated and coated time domain reflectometry probes for high electrical conductivity systems , 2002 .

[25]  Chih-Ping Lin,et al.  Apparent Dielectric Constant and Effective Frequency of TDR Measurements: Influencing Factors and Comparison , 2009 .

[26]  Wilson H. Tang,et al.  Updating occurrence probability and size of defect for bored piles , 2008 .

[27]  Won-Taek Hong,et al.  Application of time domain reflectometer for detecting necking defects in bored piles , 2018, NDT & E International.

[28]  J. L. Arrúe,et al.  Measurement of Soil Bulk Electrical Conductivity Using Partially Coated TDR Probes , 2009 .

[30]  Tony L. T. Zhan,et al.  Experimental and numerical studies on the sample area and skin effect of the three-rod time domain reflectometry probe , 2016 .

[31]  G. Wyseure,et al.  The use of insulated time-domain reflectometry sensors to measure water content in highly saline soils , 1998, Irrigation Science.

[32]  S. Jones,et al.  Considerations for Improving the Accuracy of Permittivity Measurement using Time Domain Reflectometry , 2003 .

[33]  J. Maxwell.  A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism , 1873, Nature.

[34]  L. Fan,et al.  High dielectric insulation coating for time domain reflectometry soil moisture sensor , 2004 .

[35]  Renpeng Chen,et al.  A newly designed TDR probe for soils with high electrical conductivities , 2014 .

[36]  Jianlin Zhang,et al.  Application of Artificial Neural Network for Diagnosing Pile Integrity Based on Low Strain Dynamic Testing , 2009 .

[37]  G. W. Carter,et al.  Electric Machines , 1967, Nature.

[38]  J. L. Arrúe,et al.  A new TDR waveform analysis approach for soil moisture profiling using a single probe , 2006 .

[39]  Gholamreza Amirinia,et al.  A review of Genetic Programming and Artificial Neural Network applications in pile foundations , 2018, International Journal of Geo-Engineering.

[40]  Maik Moeller,et al.  Introduction to Electrodynamics , 2017 .

[41]  M W O'Neill,et al.  STRUCTURAL RESISTANCE FACTORS FOR DRILLED SHAFTS CONSIDERING CONSTRUCTION FLAWS. IN: CURRENT PRACTICES AND FUTURE TRENDS IN DEEP FOUNDATIONS , 2004 .

[42]  Felipe Cristi,et al.  A TDR-waveform approach to estimate soil water content in electrically conductive soils , 2016, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[43]  Comparing cross-hole sonic logging and low-strain integrity testing results , 2008 .

[44]  F. Žáček,et al.  Microwave measurements of complex permittivity by free space methods and their applications , 1986 .

[45]  Michael J. Chajes,et al.  Time Domain Reflectometry for Void Detection in Grouted Posttensioned Bridges , 2003 .