Energy Efficient Water-Filling Algorithm for MIMO-OFDMA Cellular System

In this work we evaluated the performance of different water filling algorithms. We have selected four power allocation algorithms: Conventional water-filling (CWF), Constant power water-filling, Inverse Water-filling (IWF), and Adaptive Iterative Water-Filling (AIWF) algorithms. Capacity is the performance metric we used to compare the above algorithms by taking the optimality of transmission power allocation to each sub-channel into account. The power allocation can be calculated with a reference of the water level value that has different approaches for different algorithms. The water level can either be fixed once it is found, or it may be adaptive or different for different sub-channels. Hence, the results show that the adaptive iterative water filling (AIWF) algorithm has a better effect on the performance of MIMO-OFDM system by allocating power adaptively. Keywords— water filling algorithms;capacity;power allocation

[1]  Zhisheng Niu,et al.  Water-Filling: A Geometric Approach and its Application to Solve Generalized Radio Resource Allocation Problems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[2]  Martin Haardt,et al.  Zero-forcing methods for downlink spatial multiplexing in multiuser MIMO channels , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  Xiaodong Wang,et al.  Iterative Dynamic Water-Filling for Fading Multiple-Access Channels With Energy Harvesting , 2014, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[4]  Geoffrey Ye Li,et al.  Energy-Efficient MIMO-OFDMA Systems Based on Switching off RF Chains , 2011, 2011 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall).

[5]  Ling Qiu,et al.  Energy efficient iterative waterfilling for the MIMO broadcasting channels , 2012, 2012 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[6]  Harald Haas,et al.  Minimizing Base Station Power Consumption , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.