Seeking the robust core of organisational learning theory

Organisational learning theory (OLT) has become a hot topic of conversation in academic journals. However, the variety of descriptions seem to suggest no unified understanding of what OLT is. In this paper, I draw on a sample of 12 recent papers as samples of normal science and exemplars of our present level of scholarship to conduct a propositional analysis of the structure of OLT. This analysis identifies the core of OLT and finds that OLT has a robustness of 0.16 on a scale of zero to one. This low level of robustness suggests that OLT may be of limited efficacy in application. This paper creates a benchmark for the progress of OLT and suggests opportunities for advancing our understanding of OLT.

[1]  Mohan Subramaniam,et al.  The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities , 2005 .

[2]  S. Ghoshal.  Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices , 2005 .

[3]  D. Ketchen,et al.  Information Processing, Knowledge Development, and Strategic Supply Chain Performance , 2004 .

[4]  I. Lakatos.  Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1976 .

[5]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research , 2007 .

[6]  Karl R. Popper.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery. , 1977 .

[7]  B. Glaser.  Conceptualization: On Theory and Theorizing Using Grounded Theory , 2002 .

[8]  R. Pascale.  Surfing the Edge of Chaos , 2000 .

[9]  Marianne W. Lewis,et al.  Metatriangulation: Building Theory from Multiple Paradigms , 1999 .

[10]  Ken Friedman,et al.  Theory construction in design research: criteria: approaches, and methods , 2003 .

[11]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How Do Organizational Antecedents Matter? , 2005 .

[12]  J. Spender.  Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management: Whence and Whither? , 2008 .

[13]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation , 2006 .

[14]  G. Morgan,et al.  Images of Organizations , 1997 .

[15]  Commentary on Czarniawska , 2003 .

[16]  Peter J. Robertson,et al.  The Spirit of the New Workplace: Breathing Life into Organizations , 2004 .

[17]  Christine M. Beckman.  The Influence of Founding Team Company Affiliations on Firm Behavior , 2006 .

[18]  Jeffrey Alexander,et al.  The Micro-macro link , 1987 .

[19]  William H. Starbuck,et al.  Shouldn't Organization Theory Emerge from Adolescence? , 2003 .

[20]  Helen Shipton,et al.  Cohesion or Confusion? Towards a Typology for Organizational Learning Research , 2006 .

[21]  C. Huntley,et al.  Ramping up the Organizational Learning Curve: Assessing the Impact of Deliberate Learning on Organizational Performance Under Gainsharing , 2005 .

[22]  Frans M. van Eijnatten,et al.  Chaos speak: a glossary of chaordic terms and phrases , 2002 .

[23]  H. Greve,et al.  Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams , 2006 .

[24]  F. Rothaermel,et al.  The Effect of General and Partner-Specific Alliance Experience on Joint R&D Project Performance , 2005 .

[25]  Mark W. McElroy,et al.  Integrating complexity theory, knowledge management and organizational learning , 2000, J. Knowl. Manag..

[26]  David Kernick,et al.  Wanted--new methodologies for health service research. Is complexity theory the answer? , 2006, Family practice.

[27]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  Adding Interpersonal Learning and Tacit Knowledge to March's Exploration-Exploitation Model , 2006 .

[28]  N. Rajagopalan,et al.  The Influence of Acquisition Experience and Performance on Acquisition Behavior: Evidence From the U.S. Commercial Banking Industry , 2006 .

[29]  Ricardo Chiva,et al.  The Social Complexity of Organizational Learning: The Dynamics of Learning and Organizing , 2007 .

[30]  N. Rajagopalan,et al.  WHEN THE KNOWN DEVIL IS BETTER THAN AN UNKNOWN GOD: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF THE ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF RELAY CEO SUCCESSIONS , 2004 .

[31]  Steven E. Wallis.  The Structure of Theory and the Structure of Scientific Revolutions: What Constitutes an Advance in Theory? , 2010 .

[32]  Barbara Czarniawska,et al.  Is it Possible to be a Constructionist Consultant? , 2001 .

[33]  April Franco,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER THROUGH INHERITANCE: SPIN- OUT GENERATION, DEVELOPMENT, AND SURVIVAL , 2004 .

[34]  Steven E. Wallis.  From Reductive to Robust: Seeking the Core of Complex Adaptive Systems Theory , 2008 .

[35]  Bente Elkjaer,et al.  Organizational Learning , 2004 .

[36]  K. Weick.  Theory Construction as Disciplined Imagination , 1989 .

[37]  S. Kotha,et al.  Knowledge Creation Through External Venturing: Evidence from the Telecommunications Equipment Manufacturing Industry , 2006 .