Number Concepts without Number Lines in an Indigenous Group of Papua New Guinea

Background The generic concept of number line, which maps numbers to unidimensional space, is a fundamental concept in mathematics, but its cognitive origins are uncertain. Two defining criteria of the number line are that (i) there is a mapping of each individual number (or numerosity) under consideration onto a specific location on the line, and (ii) that the mapping defines a unidimensional space representing numbers with a metric — a distance function. It has been proposed that the number line is based on a spontaneous universal human intuition, rooted directly in brain evolution, that maps number magnitude to linear space with a metric. To date, no culture lacking this intuition has been documented. Methodology/Principal Findings By means of a number line task, we investigated the universality proposal with the Yupno of Papua New Guinea. Unschooled adults did exhibit a number-to-space mapping (criterion i) but, strikingly, despite having precise cardinal number concepts, they located numbers only on the endpoints, thus failing to use the extent of the line. The produced mapping was bi-categorical and metric-free, in violation of criterion ii. In contrast, Yupnos with scholastic experience used the extent of the segment according to known standards, but they did so not as evenly as western controls, exhibiting a bias towards the endpoints. Conclusions/Significance Results suggest that cardinal number concepts can exist independently from number line representations. They also suggest that the number line mapping, although ubiquitous in the modern world, is not universally spontaneous, but rather seems to be learned through — and continually reinforced by — specific cultural practices.

[1]  Geoffrey B. Saxe,et al.  The Development of Measurement Operations among the Oksapmin of Papua New Guinea. , 1982 .

[2]  Julie L. Booth,et al.  Development of numerical estimation in young children. , 2004, Child development.

[3]  Julie L. Booth,et al.  Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[4]  K. Priftis,et al.  Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line , 2002, Nature.

[5]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Exact and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group , 2004, Science.

[6]  Jürg Wassmann Das Ideal des leicht gebeugten Menschen : eine ethno-kognitive Analyse der Yupno in Papua New Guinea , 1996 .

[7]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[8]  Qing Huo Liu,et al.  Response to “Comment on ‘The complete Schwarzschild interior and exterior solution in the harmonic coordinate system’ ” [J. Math. Phys. 40, 4177 (1999)] , 1999 .

[9]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  The Mathematical Brain , 1999 .

[10]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Explicit versus Implicit Processing of Representational Space in Neglect: Dissociations in Accessing the Mental Number Line , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Geoffrey B. Saxe,et al.  Body parts as numerals: A developmental analysis of numeration among the Oksapmin in Papua New Guinea. , 1981 .

[12]  E. Spelke,et al.  Number-Space Mapping in Human Infants , 2010, Psychological science.

[13]  John Wallis,et al.  A treatise of algebra, both historical and practical , 1685, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[14]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations , 2008, Cortex.

[15]  FRANCIS GALTON,et al.  Visualised Numerals , 1880, Nature.

[16]  Pierre R. Dasen,et al.  Yupno Number System and Counting , 1994 .

[17]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Comment on "Log or Linear? Distinct Intuitions of the Number Scale in Western and Amazonian Indigene Cultures" , 2009, Science.

[18]  Rafael Núñez,et al.  Numbers and Arithmetic: Neither Hardwired Nor Out There , 2009 .

[19]  Pierre Pica,et al.  Response to Comment on "Log or Linear? Distinct Intuitions of the Number Scale in Western and Amazonian Indigene Cultures" , 2009, Science.

[20]  Carla Bosia,et al.  Supplementary Material S1 , 2011 .

[21]  Titia Gebuis,et al.  Numerosities and space; indeed a cognitive illusion! A reply to de Hevia and Spelke (2009) , 2011, Cognition.

[22]  Silke M. Göbel,et al.  Parietal rTMS distorts the mental number line: Simulating ‘spatial’ neglect in healthy subjects , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  Rafael Núñez,et al.  No Innate Number Line in the Human Brain , 2011 .

[24]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[25]  Wim Fias,et al.  The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized , 2003, Cognition.

[26]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[27]  R. Núñez,et al.  Squeezing, striking, and vocalizing: Is number representation fundamentally spatial? , 2011, Cognition.

[28]  D. Ansari Effects of development and enculturation on number representation in the brain , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  R. Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Numerical representation in the parietal lobes: abstract or not abstract? , 2009, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[30]  Jamie I. D. Campbell Handbook of mathematical cognition , 2004 .

[31]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Spontaneous mapping of number and space in adults and young children , 2009, Cognition.

[32]  J. Napier,et al.  A description of the admirable table of logarithmes , 1969 .