Building a European Portrait of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting

This article offers an original overview of non-financial disclosure on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) by concentrating on information released through corporate social, environmental and sustainability reports. It compares and contrasts corporate social disclosure practices among ninety European companies with respect to the amount and kind of information released (CSR themes and topics), by stakeholder-based categories. The paper draws on the assumption that corporate social disclosure can be considered as the most direct expression of the companies' attitudes and behaviours regarding social responsibility. The principal finding of this study is: firms' disclosure is currently restricted to specific CSR themes. The resulting corporate socially responsible portrait is linked to seven major themes that are: operational efficiency, maximum safety, environmental protection, quality & innovation, open dialogue, skill development, and responsible citizenship.

[1]  Muel Kaptein,et al.  Toward Effective Stakeholder Dialogue , 2003 .

[2]  L. Preston,et al.  Managing the Extended Enterprise: The New Stakeholder View , 2002 .

[3]  Stephen. Pavelin,et al.  Building a Good Reputation , 2004 .

[4]  T. Donaldson The Language of International Corporate Ethics , 1992, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[5]  Richard E. Wokutch,et al.  Organizational Attractiveness and Corporate Social Orientation: Do Our Values Influence Our Preference for Affirmative Action and Managing Diversity? , 2004 .

[6]  Elias Mossialos,et al.  Voluntary health insurance in the European Union: report prepared for the Directorate General for Employment and Social Affairs of the European Commission , 2002 .

[7]  C. MacDonald,et al.  Getting to the Bottom of “Triple Bottom Line” , 2004, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[8]  Alan Willis,et al.  The Role of the Global Reporting Initiative's Sustainability Reporting Guidelines in the Social Screening of Investments , 2003 .

[9]  R. Ackerman The Social Challenge to Business , 1975 .

[10]  S. Watkins Ethical Conflicts at Enron: Moral Responsibility in Corporate Capitalism , 2003 .

[11]  L. Preston Research on corporate social reporting: Directions for development , 1981 .

[12]  C. Deegan,et al.  An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983‐1997: A test of legitimacy theory , 2002 .

[13]  D. Turban,et al.  Corporate Social Performance As a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce , 2000 .

[14]  Stefano Pogutz,et al.  New Tools to Foster Corporate Socially Responsible Behavior , 2004 .

[15]  J. Pearce,et al.  The high impact of collaborative social initiatives , 2005 .

[16]  Mikael Niskala,et al.  Environmental reporting in Finland: A note on the use of annual reports☆ , 1995 .

[17]  Eric G. Flamholtz,et al.  Corporate social accounting in the United States of America: State of the art and future prospects , 1976 .

[18]  Ulrich Steger,et al.  The Business Case for Corporate Sustainability:: Literature Review and Research Options , 2005 .

[19]  M. Clarkson A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , 1995 .

[20]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective , 2001 .

[21]  R. Gray,et al.  Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies , 1995 .

[22]  Mark S. Schwartz,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain Approach , 2003 .

[23]  Betsy Stevens,et al.  An analysis of corporate ethical code studies: “Where do we go from here?” , 1994 .

[24]  R. Dye DISCLOSURE OF NONPROPRIETARY INFORMATION , 1985 .

[25]  Carol A. Adams,et al.  Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorising , 2002 .

[26]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[27]  J. Cummings Engaging stakeholders in corporate accountability programmes: A cross‐sectoral analysis of UK and transnational experience , 2001 .

[28]  G. Benston The benefits and costs to managers of voluntary accounting disclosure — A discussion of: “Current cost disclosers and nondisclosers: Theory and Canadian evidence” , 1986 .

[29]  B. Hillebrand,et al.  Managing Socially-Responsible Buying:: How to Integrate Non-economic Criteria into the Purchasing Process , 2002 .

[30]  David Hess,et al.  The Next Wave of Corporate Community Involvement: Corporate Social Initiatives , 2002 .

[31]  Reginald Hooghiemstra Corporate Communication and Impression Management – New Perspectives Why Companies Engage in Corporate Social Reporting , 2000 .

[32]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[33]  Kai Hockerts,et al.  Communicating Corporate Responsibility to Investors: The Changing Role of the Investor Relations Function , 2004 .

[34]  David Vogel,et al.  The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2005 .

[35]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[36]  M. Joseph Sirgy,et al.  Measuring Corporate Performance by Building on the Stakeholders Model of Business Ethics , 2002 .

[37]  Jeanne Liedtka,et al.  Stakeholder capitalism and the value chain , 1997 .