Temporal Semiotic Units as minimal meaningful units in music? An electrophysiological approach.

THE AIM OF THIS STUDY WAS TO DETERMINE WHETHER conceptual priming occurs between successively presented short musical pieces called Temporal Semantic Units (TSUs). Behavioral and ERP data were recorded while participants, experts and nonexperts in TSUs, were listening to pairs of TSUs and were asked to determine whether the target TSU evoked the same or a different concept than the prime TSU. Target TSUs were either congruous (i.e., they developed the same musical concept as the prime TSUs) or incongruous (i.e., they started as congruous TSUs but shifted midstream into a different concept). Results showed that, whereas P3a components were elicited in both groups by the shifting into incongruous TSUs, thereby reflecting an automatic shift of attention when the changes occurred, P3b components were elicited in experts and N400-like components were found in nonexperts. The functional significance of these results is discussed in regard of previous results with environmental sounds.

[1]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Infrequent events transiently activate human prefrontal and parietal cortex as measured by functional MRI. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  E. Courchesne,et al.  Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  J. Polich,et al.  Neuropsychology and neuropharmacology of P3a and P3b. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[4]  U. Bellugi,et al.  Neural Systems Mediating American Sign Language: Effects of Sensory Experience and Age of Acquisition , 1997, Brain and Language.

[5]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  Ava J. Senkfor,et al.  Electrophysiological dissociation between verbal and nonverbal semantic processing in learning disabled adults , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Stefan Koelsch,et al.  Shared neural resources between music and language indicate semantic processing of musical tension-resolution patterns. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of faces , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Philippe Bootz,et al.  Time Measures in Documents : The model of "Motifs Temporels Paramétrés" , 2007 .

[10]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  E. Donchin.  Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!...Surprise? , 1981, Psychophysiology.

[12]  Can Music Convey Semantic Content? A Kantian Approach , 2002 .

[13]  Byeong-Taek Lee,et al.  Brain activation during music listening in individuals with or without prior music training , 2005, Neuroscience Research.

[14]  M. Tervaniemi,et al.  Superior pre-attentive auditory processing in musicians. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[15]  M. Hansenne,et al.  Le potentiel évoqué cognitif P300 (I) : aspects théorique et psychobiologique , 2000, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  J. Polich,et al.  P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  G. Schlaug,et al.  Brain Structures Differ between Musicians and Non-Musicians , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  M. Tervaniemi,et al.  Pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians vs nonmusicians: an event-related potential and behavioral study , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  E. John,et al.  Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty , 1965, Science.

[20]  A. Engel,et al.  Auditory novelty oddball allows reliable distinction of top-down and bottom-up processes of attention. , 2002, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[21]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[22]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of pictures , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[23]  J. Townsend,et al.  Auditory semantic networks for words and natural sounds , 2006, Brain Research.

[24]  Mari Riess Jones,et al.  Music as a stimulus for psychological motion: Part II. An expectancy model. , 1982 .

[25]  T. Picton.  The Endogenous Evoked Potentials , 1988 .

[26]  A. Friederici,et al.  Music, language and meaning: brain signatures of semantic processing , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Sachiko Koyama,et al.  Effects of semantic context and event-related potentials: N400 correlates with inhibition effect , 1992, Brain and Language.

[28]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults , 1999, Cognition.

[29]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[30]  Guido Orgs,et al.  Conceptual priming for environmental sounds and words: An ERP study , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[31]  A. Friederici,et al.  Brain Indices of Music Processing: Nonmusicians are Musical , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  B. Renault,et al.  An ERP Study of Famous Face Incongruity Detection in Middle Age , 2001, Brain and Cognition.

[33]  Guido Orgs,et al.  Is conceptual priming for environmental sounds obligatory? , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[34]  Leonard B. Meyer.  Emotion and Meaning in Music , 1957 .

[35]  Wayne Slawson,et al.  A Reply to Peel and Slawson's Review of "A Generative Theory of Tonal Music" , 1985 .

[36]  E. Bigand,et al.  Are we “experienced listeners”? A review of the musical capacities that do not depend on formal musical training , 2006, Cognition.

[37]  Aniruddh D. Patel,et al.  Processing Syntactic Relations in Language and Music: An Event-Related Potential Study , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  S. Farmer,et al.  The effects of physical and semantic incongruities on auditory event-related potentials. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[39]  R. Jackendoff,et al.  A Generative Theory of Tonal Music , 1985 .

[40]  S. Yamaguchi,et al.  Anterior and posterior association cortex contributions to the somatosensory P300 , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[41]  Mari Riess Jones,et al.  Music as a stimulus for psychological motion: Part I. Some determinants of expectancies. , 1981 .

[42]  M. Kutas,et al.  A preliminary comparison of the N400 response to semantic anomalies during reading, listening and signing. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[43]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[44]  M. Kutas,et al.  The Search for Common Sense: An Electrophysiological Study of the Comprehension of Words and Pictures in Reading , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  C. Petten,et al.  Conceptual relationships between spoken words and environmental sounds: Event-related brain potential measures , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials Reflect Semantic Priming in an Object Decision Task , 1994, Brain and Cognition.