Relationships between daily affect and pro‐environmental behavior at work: The moderating role of pro‐environmental attitude

Research in organizational psychology has increasingly focused on understanding the determinants of "green" employee behavior. The present study used a daily diary design to investigate relationships between employees' daily affect, pro-environmental attitude, as well as daily task-related pro-environmental behavior (i.e., the extent to which employees complete required work tasks in environmentally friendly ways), and daily proactive pro-environmental behavior (i.e., the extent to which employees show personal initiative when acting in environmentally friendly ways at work). Fifty-six employees working in small businesses completed a baseline survey and two daily surveys over ten workdays. Daily unactivated positive affect and pro-environmental attitude positively predicted daily task-related pro-environmental behavior. In addition, daily activated positive affect positively predicted daily proactive pro-environmental behavior among employees with a less positive pro-environmental attitude but not among employees with a more positive pro-environmental attitude. These findings suggest that fostering pro-environmental attitudes and, to some extent, positive affect among employees could help organizations to promote pro-environmental behavior in the workplace.

[1]  B. Fredrickson.  The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. , 2001, The American psychologist.

[2]  Paul Sparks,et al.  Engaging with the natural environment : the role of affective connection and identity , 2008 .

[3]  N. Bolger,et al.  Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[4]  B. Fredrickson.  What Good Are Positive Emotions? , 1998, Review of general psychology : journal of Division 1, of the American Psychological Association.

[5]  Gary Blau,et al.  Enacting Ecological Sustainability in the MNC: A Test of an Adapted Value-Belief-Norm Framework , 2005 .

[6]  L. J. Williams,et al.  Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-Role Behaviors , 1991 .

[7]  K. Scherer,et al.  Handbook of affective sciences. , 2003 .

[8]  S. Bamberg.  How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question , 2003 .

[9]  J. Dutton,et al.  Positive Organizational Scholarship , 2007 .

[10]  Michael Frese,et al.  Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany , 1996 .

[11]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Affect and Creativity at Work , 2005 .

[13]  P. Bordia,et al.  When employees strike back: investigating mediating mechanisms between psychological contract breach and workplace deviance. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  Marilyn A. Uy,et al.  How do feelings influence effort? An empirical study of entrepreneurs' affect and venture effort. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  R. Petty,et al.  Attitude strength: An overview. , 1995 .

[16]  Daniel J. Bauer,et al.  Computational Tools for Probing Interactions in Multiple Linear Regression, Multilevel Modeling, and Latent Curve Analysis , 2006 .

[17]  T. Dalgleish,et al.  Handbook of cognition and emotion , 1999 .

[18]  Remus Ilies,et al.  Hostility, job attitudes, and workplace deviance: test of a multilevel model. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  W. Borman,et al.  Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance , 1993 .

[20]  Anke Arnaud,et al.  Positively ethical: the establishment of innovation in support of sustainability , 2010 .

[21]  Paul E. Spector.  Method Variance in Organizational Research , 2006 .

[22]  D. Watson,et al.  Toward a consensual structure of mood. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  F. Kaiser,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDE AND ECOLOGICAL BEHAVIOUR , 1999 .

[24]  S. Sonnentag,et al.  Antecedents of Day-Level Proactive Behavior: A Look at Job Stressors and Positive Affect During the Workday† , 2009 .

[25]  Terry L Tudor,et al.  A Novel Conceptual Framework for Examining Environmental Behavior in Large Organizations , 2008 .

[26]  Donald H. Kluemper,et al.  State or trait: effects of state optimism on job-related outcomes , 2009 .

[27]  Michel Tuan Pham,et al.  When Do People Rely on Affective and Cognitive Feelings in Judgment? A Review , 2011, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[28]  D. Beal,et al.  An episodic process model of affective influences on performance. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  Marcellus Jones.  Social Responsibility and the "Green" Business Firm , 1996 .

[30]  L. M. Anderson,et al.  Individual Environmental Initiative: Championing Natural Environmental Issues in U.S. Business Organizations , 2000 .

[31]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  THE ROLE OF AFFECTIVE EXPERIENCE IN WORK MOTIVATION. , 2004, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[32]  Kibeom Lee,et al.  Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: the role of affect and cognitions. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  A. Griffiths,et al.  The role of emotions in driving workplace pro-environmental behaviors , 2008 .

[34]  Neal M. Ashkanasy,et al.  Rumors of the death of emotional intelligence in organizational behavior are vastly exaggerated , 2005 .

[35]  D. Tucker,et al.  Motivating the focus of attention. , 1994 .

[36]  T. Milfont,et al.  The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis , 2010 .

[37]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  The role of affective experience in work motivation: Test of a conceptual model. , 2010, Journal of organizational behavior.

[38]  M. Frese,et al.  4. Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century , 2001 .

[39]  A. Kollmuss,et al.  Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? , 2002 .

[40]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale , 2000 .

[41]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The “New Environmental Paradigm” , 1978 .

[42]  Mark Cordano,et al.  Pollution Reduction Preferences of U.S. Environmental Managers: Applying Ajzen'S Theory of Planned Behavior , 2000 .

[43]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[44]  D. Beal,et al.  Stability, change, and the stability of change in daily workplace affect , 2011 .

[45]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  UNDERSTANDING WORK USING THE OCCUPATIONAL INFORMATION NETWORK (O*NET): IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH , 2001 .

[46]  A. Brief,et al.  Organizational behavior: affect in the workplace. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[47]  S. Bamberg,et al.  Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour , 2007 .

[48]  T. Judge,et al.  Can "good" stressors spark "bad" behaviors? The mediating role of emotions in links of challenge and hindrance stressors with citizenship and counterproductive behaviors. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[49]  J. George.  State or trait: Effects of positive mood on prosocial behaviors at work. , 1991 .

[50]  C. Binnewies,et al.  What makes a creative day? A diary study on the interplay between affect, job stressors, and job control. , 2011 .

[51]  N. Frijda,et al.  Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness , 1989 .

[52]  D. Hofmann,et al.  The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. , 2000 .

[53]  S. Russell,et al.  EXPLAINING WORKPLACE PROENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIORS: THE ROLE OF EMOTION, VALUES AND ISSUE OWNERSHIP. , 2008 .

[54]  Michael Frese,et al.  The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples , 1997 .

[55]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  The role of affect in decision making. , 2003 .

[56]  S. Fineman.  Emotional Subtexts in Corporate Greening , 1996 .

[57]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Cross-lagged panel correlation: A test for spuriousness. , 1975 .

[58]  Charles A. Scherbaum,et al.  Exploring Individual‐Level Factors Related to Employee Energy‐Conservation Behaviors at Work , 2008 .

[59]  J. Forgas.  Mood and judgment: the affect infusion model (AIM). , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[60]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. , 1977 .

[61]  Charmine E. J. Härtel,et al.  Book Review , 2002 .

[62]  Curtis P. Haugtvedt,et al.  Attitudes and Recycling: Does the Measurement of Affect Enhance Behavioral Prediction? , 1994 .

[63]  Uta K. Bindl,et al.  Fuel of the self-starter: how mood relates to proactive goal regulation. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.

[64]  H. Weiss,et al.  Affective Events Theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. , 1996 .

[65]  Michael Frese,et al.  The affective shift model of work engagement. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[66]  Chelsea Schelly,et al.  Reducing Energy Consumption and Creating a Conservation Culture in Organizations: A Case Study of One Public School District , 2011 .

[67]  J. Hirsh,et al.  Personality and environmental concern , 2010 .

[68]  Uta K. Bindl,et al.  Making Things Happen: A Model of Proactive Motivation , 2010 .

[69]  Leandre R. Fabrigar,et al.  Emotional factors in attitudes and persuasion. , 2003 .

[70]  R. Dunlap,et al.  THE NEW ENVIRONMENTAL PARADIGM: 5 PROPOSED MEASURING INSTRUMENT AND PRELIMINARY RESULTS , 1978 .

[71]  Charles A. Scherbaum,et al.  Estimating Statistical Power and Required Sample Sizes for Organizational Research Using Multilevel Modeling , 2009 .

[72]  Neal M. Ashkanasy,et al.  The emerging role of emotions in work life: An introduction. , 2000 .

[73]  Sandra Ohly,et al.  Diary Studies in Organizational Research: An Introduction and Some Practical Recommendations , 2010 .

[74]  J. Rivera,et al.  Distinguishing elation, gladness, and joy. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[75]  F. Siero,et al.  Changing organizational energy consumption behaviour through comparative feedback , 1996 .

[76]  U. Steger,et al.  The Roles of Supervisory Support Behaviors and Environmental Policy in Employee “Ecoinitiatives” at Leading-Edge European Companies. , 2000 .

[77]  C. Vlek,et al.  Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour : An integrative review and research agenda , 2009 .

[78]  R. Petty,et al.  Attitude strength : antecedents and consequences , 1995 .

[79]  R. Marans,et al.  Factors Influencing Individual Recycling Behavior in Office Settings , 1995 .

[80]  Dan Dolderman,et al.  Personality predictors of Consumerism and Environmentalism: A preliminary study , 2007 .

[81]  Daniel A. Newman,et al.  How Important are Job Attitudes? Meta-Analytic Comparisons of Integrative Behavioral Outcomes and Time Sequences , 2006 .

[82]  J. Russell.  A circumplex model of affect. , 1980 .

[83]  S. J. Kraus,et al.  Attitudes and the Prediction of Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature , 1990 .

[84]  Vladas Griskevicius,et al.  INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES Going Green to Be Seen : Status , Reputation , and Conspicuous Conservation , 2010 .

[85]  Lynne M. Andersson,et al.  On the relationship of hope and gratitude to corporate social responsibility , 2007 .

[86]  Mark Cordano,et al.  How do Small and Medium Enterprises Go “Green”? A Study of Environmental Management Programs in the U.S. Wine Industry , 2010 .

[87]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[88]  T. Judge,et al.  Affect and job satisfaction: a study of their relationship at work and at home. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.