[1] For several years a clear trend from the application of classical so-called “single layer” models to attempts to model the ionosphere in accordance to its real three-dimensional nature can be observed (see, e.g., Scherliess et al., 2003; Hernandez-Pajares et al., 1999). European Space Agency (ESA)/European Space Operations Centre (ESOC) commenced in 1998 employing a three-dimensional (3-D) model for ionosphere processing (Feltens, 1998; Feltens et al., 1998). This first version of a 3-D model at ESOC model was based on a simple Chapman profile approach, assuming that the vertical component of the ionosphere could be mathematically expressed in terms of a single β-layer Chapman profile function. The profile function's parameters, maximum electron density N0 and its height h0, were in turn expressed as surface functions of geomagnetic latitude and local time whose coefficients were estimated. In this way a horizontal variation of N0 and h0 was modeled, and the profile function varied vertically, depending on the actual N0 and h0 values at a certain location. The ionosphere, however, consists of several layers. Additionally, the plasmasphere on top of the ionosphere must be accounted for, and the scale height, needed to compute the profile function z-parameter, is height-dependent. Furthermore, some of the ionosphere layers are so called α-layers and some parts of the ionosphere show special behavior. All these effects must be accounted for in a proper 3-D mathematical modeling. It is the intent of this paper to give a substantial overview over the 3-D ionosphere models developed at ESOC and their current testing and implementation status.
[1]
S. Pulinets,et al.
Improvements of the International Reference Ionosphere model for the topside electron density profile
,
2006
.
[2]
Sandro M. Radicella,et al.
The evolution of the DGR approach to model electron density profiles
,
2001
.
[3]
Rodney B. Bent,et al.
Documentation and Description of the Bent Ionospheric Model
,
1973
.
[4]
H. J. Hagger,et al.
Radio ray propagation in the ionosphere
,
1965
.
[5]
Y. Chiu.
An improved phenomenological model of ionospheric density
,
1975
.
[6]
B. K. Ching,et al.
A phenomenological model of global ionospheric electron density in the E-, F1- and F2-regions
,
1973
.
[7]
Bodo W. Reinisch,et al.
International Reference Ionosphere 2000
,
2001
.
[8]
M. Lester.
Ionospheric convection and its relevance for space weather
,
2003
.
[9]
I. S. Gradshteyn,et al.
Table of Integrals, Series, and Products
,
1976
.
[10]
Sandro M. Radicella,et al.
An analytical model of the electron density profile in the ionosphere
,
1990
.
[11]
Attila Komjathy,et al.
Global ionospheric total electron content mapping using the global positioning system
,
1997
.
[12]
M. Fox,et al.
A simple, convenient formalism for electron density profiles
,
1994
.
[13]
Jaume Sanz,et al.
New approaches in global ionospheric determination using ground GPS data
,
1999
.