Heuristic Based on Dynamic Weighting to Support Diagnosis with Two Minimization Focus in Alignment Incoherence Repair

Ontology alignment is a collection of correspondences or mappings between entities from two ontologies being matched. Alignment is an essential data resource that used as a reference to build interlinking on Linked Data. Since it is produced by an ontology matching system, the good quality of alignment determines the good performance of the ontology matching system. The coherence of alignment is one of the success criteria of the ontology matching system so that some systems implement the alignment repair feature in it. This feature restores the incoherent to coherent by removing some mappings in alignment. Research of alignment incoherence stated that the repair process should have a minimum impact on alignment by minimizing the number of removed mappings and/or minimizing the confidence value of removed mappings. The study discussed in this paper is alignment repair to restore coherent conditions with two minimization focus of diagnosis. In a repair system, the process of finding and removing a mapping to produce conflict-free alignment is called the diagnosis. We have been proven that conflict-free alignment is coherent alignment. The proposed repair system implements a dynamic weighting heuristic to guide the search for minimum removed mapping with two minimization focus, in order to produce conflict-free alignment. Experiment on 8 alignments shows that the current system which removes more mapping will produce conflictfree alignment, but does not support minimal impact. Conversely, the current system that removes minimal mapping does not support conflict-free alignment. The proposed system excels at producing conflict-free alignment with minimal impact.

[1]  Benhard Sitohang,et al.  Global Minimal Diagnosis Algorithm For Repair Incoherent Mappings in Ontology Alignment , 2018, 2018 19th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD).

[2]  Qilin Sun,et al.  GMap: results for OAEI 2015 , 2015, OM.

[3]  Bart Selman,et al.  S. Russell, P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Third Edition , 2011, Artif. Intell..

[4]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  Completeness and optimality in ontology alignment debugging , 2014, OM.

[5]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  Incoherence as a Basis for Measuring the Quality of Ontology Mappings , 2008, OM.

[6]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  Debugging Incoherent Terminologies , 2007, Journal of Automated Reasoning.

[7]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  A Practical Implementation of Semantic Precision and Recall , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems.

[8]  Emanuel Santos,et al.  Ontology Alignment Repair through Modularization and Confidence-Based Heuristics , 2013, PloS one.

[9]  Juhana Salim,et al.  Symbiosis of thesaurus, domain expert and reference sources in designing a framework for the construction of a multilingual ontology for Islamic Portal , 2012 .

[10]  Benhard Sitohang,et al.  Diagnosis process with two focuses minimal in incoherent mapping repair , 2017, 2017 International Electronics Symposium on Knowledge Creation and Intelligent Computing (IES-KCIC).

[11]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  An Efficient Method for Computing Alignment Diagnoses , 2009, RR.

[12]  François Scharffe,et al.  Linked Data Meets Ontology Matching - Enhancing Data Linking through Ontology Alignments , 2011, KEOD.

[13]  Ontology Alignment , 2014, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[14]  Ben Coppin,et al.  Artificial Intelligence Illuminated , 2004 .

[15]  Benhard Sitohang,et al.  Minimizing the estimated solution cost with A∗ search to support minimal mapping repair , 2017, 2017 4th International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Informatics (EECSI).

[16]  Benhard Sitohang,et al.  Optimal Path Finding Algorithm Using Weighted Based Heuristic for Incoherent Mapping Repair , 2018, 2018 5th International Conference on Data and Software Engineering (ICoDSE).

[17]  Christian Meilicke,et al.  Alignment incoherence in ontology matching , 2011 .

[18]  Luca Viganò,et al.  Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) , 2015, IWSEC 2015.

[19]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  Evaluating Mapping Repair Systems with Large Biomedical Ontologies , 2013, Description Logics.

[20]  Benhard Sitohang,et al.  Comparisons of diagnosis in mapping repair systems , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Data and Software Engineering (ICoDSE).

[21]  Catia Pesquita,et al.  Towards Annotating Potential Incoherences in BioPortal Mappings , 2014, SEMWEB.

[22]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative , 2007 .

[23]  Bao-Quoc Ho,et al.  Cluster-based similarity aggregation for ontology matching , 2011, OM.

[24]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2007 , 2006, OM.

[25]  Bernardo Cuenca Grau,et al.  On the Feasibility of Using OWL 2 DL Reasoners for Ontology Matching Problems , 2012, ORE.

[26]  Emanuel Santos,et al.  To repair or not to repair: reconciling correctness and coherence in ontology reference alignments , 2013, OM.

[27]  Bernardo Cuenca Grau,et al.  LogMap: Logic-Based and Scalable Ontology Matching , 2011, SEMWEB.