An experimental investigation of some properties of individual iconic gestures that mediate their communicative power.

It has been hypothesized that the iconic hand gestures that accompany talk communicate important semantic information. This research tests whether some gestures, in the absence of speech, are more communicative than others and considers what properties of gestures might affect their communicative power. Our research found that the communicative power of gestures does vary greatly, and that this is significantly affected by the viewpoint from which a gesture is generated, with character viewpoint gestures being more communicative than observer viewpoint gestures. It has also been suggested that gesture viewpoint is connected with the transitivity of the clause that it accompanies, and it was found in our study that respondents appeared to obtain syntactic information about the associated clause from the gesture. This conclusion was based on the observation that when respondents attempted to report what information was contained in gestures, viewed in the absence of speech, there was a significantly higher proportion of transitive structures in their answers after they had watched character viewpoint gestures compared with observer viewpoint gestures. Communication about the syntax of the accompanying clause might thus be a critical, but thus far neglected, aspect of the role of gestures in everyday talk.

[1]  B. Butterworth,et al.  Iconic gestures, imagery, and word retrieval in speech , 1997 .

[2]  A. Kendon Some Relationships Between Body Motion and Speech , 1972 .

[3]  G. Beattie,et al.  Iconic hand gestures and the predictability of words in context in spontaneous speech. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[4]  G. Beattie,et al.  Do iconic gestures have a functional role in lexical access? An experimental study of the effects of repeating a verbal message on gesture production , 1998 .

[5]  D. McNeill Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought , 1992 .

[6]  John Bulwer Chirologia or the Natural Language of the Hand , 1974 .

[7]  B. Butterworth,et al.  Gesture, speech, and computational stages: a reply to McNeill. , 1989, Psychological review.

[8]  Beth Levy,et al.  Conceptual Representations in Lan-guage Activity and Gesture , 1980 .

[9]  G. Miller,et al.  Language and Perception , 1976 .

[10]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: an alternative account. , 2001, Journal of child language.

[11]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[12]  W. Rogers,et al.  THE CONTRIBUTION OF KINESIC ILLUSTRATORS TOWARD THE COMPREHENSION OF VERBAL BEHAVIOR WITHIN UTTERANCES , 1978 .

[13]  Adam Kendon,et al.  How gestures can become like words , 1988 .

[14]  D. McNeill So you think gestures are nonverbal , 1985 .

[15]  G. Beattie,et al.  An experimental investigation of the role of iconic gestures in lexical access using the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon. , 1999, British journal of psychology.

[16]  GEOFFREY BEATTIE,et al.  Do iconic hand gestures really contribute anything to the semantic information conveyed by speech? An experimental investigation , 1999 .

[17]  Heather Shovelton,et al.  Mapping the Range of Information Contained in the Iconic Hand Gestures that Accompany Spontaneous Speech , 1999 .