Environmental performance of construction waste: Comparing three scenarios from a case study in Catalonia, Spain.

The main objective of this paper is to evaluate environmental impacts of construction wastes in terms of the LIFE 98 ENV/E/351 project. Construction wastes are classified in accordance with the Life Program Environment Directive of the European Commission. Three different scenarios to current waste management from a case study in Catalonia (Spain) have been compared: landfilling, recycling and incineration, and these scenarios were evaluated by means of Life Cycle Assessment. The recommendations of the Catalan Waste Catalogue and the European Waste Catalogue have been taken into account. Also, the influence of transport has been evaluated. Results show that in terms of the Global Warming Potential, the most environmentally friendly treatment was recycling, followed by incineration and lastly landfilling. According to the influence of treatment plants location on the GWP indicator, we observe that incineration and recycling of construction wastes are better than landfilling, even for long distances from the building site to the plants. This is true for most wastes except for the stony types, than should be recycled close to the building site. In summary, data from construction waste of a Catalan case study was evaluated using the well established method of LCA to determine the environmental impacts.

[1]  Anna Björklund,et al.  What life-cycle assessment does and does not do in assessments of waste management. , 2007, Waste management.

[2]  Oscar Ortiz,et al.  Sustainability based on LCM of residential dwellings: A case study in Catalonia, Spain , 2009 .

[3]  Hellenic Republic.  National Reporting to the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Sessions of the COMMISSION on SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT of the UNITED NATIONS (UN-CSD 18/19) , 2011 .

[4]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  The adoption of life-cycle approaches by industry: patterns and impacts , 1997 .

[5]  M. Noguer,et al.  Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2002 .

[6]  Gracia Rodríguez,et al.  The contribution of environmental management systems to the management of construction and demolition waste: The case of the Autonomous Community of Madrid (Spain) , 2007 .

[7]  Yun Bai,et al.  Strength and durability of concrete with ash aggregate , 2005 .

[8]  Rawshan Ara Begum,et al.  Implementation of waste management and minimisation in the construction industry of Malaysia , 2007 .

[9]  Jaime Solís-Guzmán,et al.  A Spanish model for quantification and management of construction waste. , 2009, Waste management.

[10]  M. Wittmaier,et al.  Possibilities and limitations of life cycle assessment (LCA) in the development of waste utilization systems - Applied examples for a region in Northern Germany. , 2009, Waste management.

[11]  Nilay Cosgun,et al.  A study conducted to reduce construction waste generation in Turkey , 2007 .

[12]  Per Levin,et al.  Environmental assessment of rebuilding and possible performance improvements effect on a national scale , 2004 .

[13]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[14]  Stefan Salhofer,et al.  Landfill modelling in LCA - a contribution based on empirical data. , 2007, Waste management.

[15]  Mufide Banar,et al.  Life cycle assessment of solid waste management options for Eskisehir, Turkey. , 2009, Waste management.

[16]  Thomas H Christensen,et al.  Environmental assessment of solid waste landfilling technologies by means of LCA-modeling. , 2009, Waste management.

[17]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[18]  Oscar Ortiz,et al.  Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA , 2009 .